Unravel Carbonate Reservoir Heterogeneities Through 3D Seismic Neural Network Application: A Machine Learning Based Approach and Workflow

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimmas Ramadhan ◽  
Krishna Pratama Laya ◽  
Ricko Rizkiaputra ◽  
Esterlinda Sinlae ◽  
Ari Subekti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Carbonate Facies ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Facies Classification ◽  
Unsupervised Neural Network ◽  
Tight Gas Reservoir

Abstract The availability of 3D seismic data undoubtedly plays an important role in reservoir characterization. Currently seismic technology continues to advance at a rapid pace not only in the acquisition but also in processing and interpretation domain. The advance on this is well supported by the digitalization era which urges everything to run reliably fast, effective and efficient. Thanks to continuous development of IT peripherals we now have luxury to process and handle big data through the application of machine learning. Some debates on the effectiveness and threats that this process may automating certain task and later will decrease human workforce are still going on in many forums but still like it or not this machine learning is already embraced in almost every aspect of our life including in oil & gas industry. Carbonate reservoir on the other hand has been long known for its uniqueness compared to siliciclastic reservoir. The term heterogeneous properties are quite common for carbonate due to its complex multi-story depositional and diagenetic facies. In this paper, we bring up our case where we try to unravel carbonate heterogeneity from a massive tight gas reservoir through our machine learning application using the workflow of supervised and unsupervised neural network. In this study, we incorporate 3D PSTM seismic data and its stratigraphic interpretation coupled with the core study result, BHI (borehole image) log interpretation, and our regional understanding of the area to develop a meaningful carbonate facies model through seismic neural network exercises. As the result, we successfully derive geological consistent carbonate facies classification and distribution honoring all the supporting data above though the limitation of well penetration in the area. This result then proved to be beneficial to build integrated 3D geomodel which later can explain the issue on different gas compositions happens in the area. The result on unsupervised neural network also able to serves as a quick look for further sweetspot analysis to support full-field development.

Applications of Artificial Neural Networks for Seismic Facies Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (02) ◽  
pp. 68-69
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Probabilistic Neural Network ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Seismic Facies ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Facies Classification

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 200577, “Applications of Artificial Neural Networks for Seismic Facies Classification: A Case Study From the Mid-Cretaceous Reservoir in a Supergiant Oil Field,” by Ali Al-Ali, Karl Stephen, SPE, and Asghar Shams, Heriot-Watt University, prepared for the 2020 SPE Europec featured at the 82nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, originally scheduled to be held in Amsterdam, 1-3 December. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Facies classification using data from sources such as wells and outcrops cannot capture all reservoir characterization in the interwell region. Therefore, as an alternative approach, seismic facies classification schemes are applied to reduce the uncertainties in the reservoir model. In this study, a machine-learning neural network was introduced to predict the lithology required for building a full-field Earth model for carbonate reservoirs in southern Iraq. The work and the methodology provide a significant improvement in facies classification and reveal the capability of a probabilistic neural network technique. Introduction The use of machine learning in seismic facies classification has increased gradually during the past decade in the interpretation of 3D and 4D seismic volumes and reservoir characterization work flows. The complete paper provides a literature review regarding this topic. Previously, seismic reservoir characterization has revealed the heterogeneity of the Mishrif reservoir and its distribution in terms of the pore system and the structural model. However, the main objective of this work is to classify and predict the heterogeneous facies of the carbonate Mishrif reservoir in a giant oil field using a multilayer feed-forward network (MLFN) and a probabilistic neural network (PNN) in nonlinear facies classification techniques. A related objective was to find any domain-specific causal relationships among input and output variables. These two methods have been applied to classify and predict the presence of different facies in Mishrif reservoir rock types. Case Study Reservoir and Data Set Description. The West Qurna field is a giant, multibillion-barrel oil field in the southern Mesopotamian Basin with multiple carbonate and clastic reservoirs. The overall structure of the field is a north/south trending anticline steep on the western flank and gentle on the eastern flank. Many producing reservoirs developed in this oil field; however, the Mid- Cretaceous Mishrif reservoir is the main producing reservoir. The reservoir consists of thick carbonate strata (roughly 250 m) deposited on a shallow water platform adjacent to more-distal, deeper-water nonreservoir carbonate facies developing into three stratigraphic sequence units in the second order. Mishrif facies are characterized by a porosity greater than 20% and large permeability contrast from grainstones to microporosity (10-1000 md). The first full-field 3D seismic data set was achieved over 500 km2 during 2012 and 2013 in order to plan the development of all field reservoirs. A de-tailed description of the reservoir has been determined from well logs and core and seismic data. This study is mainly based on facies log (22 wells) and high-resolution 3D seismic volume to generate seismic attributes as the input data for the training of the neural network model. The model is used to evaluate lithofacies in wells without core data but with appropriate facies logs. Also, testing was carried out in parallel with the core data to verify the results of facies classification.

A comparison of deep machine learning and Monte Carlo methods for facies classification from seismic data

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. WA41-WA52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Grana ◽  
Leonardo Azevedo ◽  
Mingliang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Monte Carlo Methods ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Facies Classification ◽  
The Neural Network

Among the large variety of mathematical and computational methods for estimating reservoir properties such as facies and petrophysical variables from geophysical data, deep machine-learning algorithms have gained significant popularity for their ability to obtain accurate solutions for geophysical inverse problems in which the physical models are partially unknown. Solutions of classification and inversion problems are generally not unique, and uncertainty quantification studies are required to quantify the uncertainty in the model predictions and determine the precision of the results. Probabilistic methods, such as Monte Carlo approaches, provide a reliable approach for capturing the variability of the set of possible models that match the measured data. Here, we focused on the classification of facies from seismic data and benchmarked the performance of three different algorithms: recurrent neural network, Monte Carlo acceptance/rejection sampling, and Markov chain Monte Carlo. We tested and validated these approaches at the well locations by comparing classification predictions to the reference facies profile. The accuracy of the classification results is defined as the mismatch between the predictions and the log facies profile. Our study found that when the training data set of the neural network is large enough and the prior information about the transition probabilities of the facies in the Monte Carlo approach is not informative, machine-learning methods lead to more accurate solutions; however, the uncertainty of the solution might be underestimated. When some prior knowledge of the facies model is available, for example, from nearby wells, Monte Carlo methods provide solutions with similar accuracy to the neural network and allow a more robust quantification of the uncertainty, of the solution.

Using AI/ML to Explore & Develop Quickly and Efficiently

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Aming
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Structure Amplitude ◽  
Zero Crossing ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Exploration And Production ◽  
Data Volume ◽  
3D Seismic Data

Abstract See how application of a fully trained Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Machine Learning (ML) technology applied to 3D seismic data volumes delivers an unbiased data driven assessment of entire volumes or corporate seismic data libraries quickly. Whether the analysis is undertaken using onsite hardware or a cloud based mega cluster, this automated approach provides unparalleled insights for the interpretation and prospectivity analysis of any dataset. The Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Machine Learning (ML) technology uses unsupervised genetics algorithms to create families of waveforms, called GeoPopulations, that are used to derive Amplitude, Structure (time or depth depending on the input 3D seismic volume) and the new seismic Fitness attribute. We will show how Fitness is used to interpret paleo geomorphology and facies maps for every peak, trough and zero crossing of the 3D seismic volume. Using the Structure, Amplitude and Fitness attribute maps created for every peak, trough and zero crossing the Exploration and Production (E&P) team can evaluate and mitigate Geological and Geophysical (G&G) risks and uncertainty associated with their petroleum systems quickly using the entire 3D seismic data volume.

Unsupervised machine learning using 3D seismic data applied to reservoir evaluation and rock type identification

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-69
Author(s):  
Marwa Hussein ◽  
Robert R. Stewart ◽  
Deborah Sacrey ◽  
Jonny Wu ◽  
Rajas Athale
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Rock Type ◽  
Seismic Attributes ◽  
Reservoir Quality ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Unsupervised Machine Learning ◽  
Amplitude Data ◽  
3D Seismic Data

Net reservoir discrimination and rock type identification play vital roles in determining reservoir quality, distribution, and identification of stratigraphic baffles for optimizing drilling plans and economic petroleum recovery. Although it is challenging to discriminate small changes in reservoir properties or identify thin stratigraphic barriers below seismic resolution from conventional seismic amplitude data, we have found that seismic attributes aid in defining the reservoir architecture, properties, and stratigraphic baffles. However, analyzing numerous individual attributes is a time-consuming process and may have limitations for revealing small petrophysical changes within a reservoir. Using the Maui 3D seismic data acquired in offshore Taranaki Basin, New Zealand, we generate typical instantaneous and spectral decomposition seismic attributes that are sensitive to lithologic variations and changes in reservoir properties. Using the most common petrophysical and rock typing classification methods, the rock quality and heterogeneity of the C1 Sand reservoir are studied for four wells located within the 3D seismic volume. We find that integrating the geologic content of a combination of eight spectral instantaneous attribute volumes using an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm (self-organizing maps [SOMs]) results in a classification volume that can highlight reservoir distribution and identify stratigraphic baffles by correlating the SOM clusters with discrete net reservoir and flow-unit logs. We find that SOM classification of natural clusters of multiattribute samples in the attribute space is sensitive to subtle changes within the reservoir’s petrophysical properties. We find that SOM clusters appear to be more sensitive to porosity variations compared with lithologic changes within the reservoir. Thus, this method helps us to understand reservoir quality and heterogeneity in addition to illuminating thin reservoirs and stratigraphic baffles.

Application of Machine Learniing For Reservoir Facies Classification in Port Field, Offshore Niger Delta

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Asedegbega ◽  
Oladayo Ayinde ◽  
Alexander Nwakanma
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Niger Delta ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Data Preparation ◽  
K Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Blind Test ◽  
Facies Classification ◽  
Well Data

Abstract Several computer-aided techniques have been developed in recent past to improve interpretational accuracy of subsurface geology. This paradigm shift has provided tremendous success in variety of Machine Learning Application domains and help for better feasibility study in reservoir evaluation using multiple classification techniques. Facies classification is an essential subsurface exploration task as sedimentary facies reflect associated physical, chemical, and biological conditions that formation unit experienced during sedimentation activity. This study however, employed formation samples for facies classification using Machine Learning (ML) techniques and classified different facies from well logs in seven (7) wells of the PORT Field, Offshore Niger Delta. Six wells were concatenated during data preparation and trained using supervised ML algorithms before validating the models by blind testing on one well log to predict discrete facies groups. The analysis started with data preparation and examination where various features of the available well data were conditioned. For the model building and performance, support vector machine, random forest, decision tree, extra tree, neural network (multilayer preceptor), k-nearest neighbor and logistic regression model were built after dividing the data sets into training, test, and blind test well data. Results of metric score for the blind test well estimated for the various models using Jaccard index and F1-score indicated 0.73 and 0.82 for support vector machine, 0.38 and 0.54 for random forest, 0.78 and 0.83 for extra tree, 0.91 and 0.95 for k-nearest neighbor, 0.41 and 0.56 for decision tree, 0.63 and 0.74 for logistic regression, 0.55 and 0.68 for neural network, respectively. The efficiency of ML techniques for enhancing the prediction accuracy and decreasing the procedure time and their approach toward the data, makes it importantly desirable to recommend them in subsurface facies classification analysis.

A comparison of classification techniques for seismic facies recognition

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. SAE29-SAE58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhao ◽  
Vikram Jayaram ◽  
Atish Roy ◽  
Kurt J. Marfurt
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Gaussian Mixture ◽  
Seismic Facies ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Generative Topographic Mapping ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Facies Classification ◽  
Data Volume ◽  
3D Seismic Data

During the past decade, the size of 3D seismic data volumes and the number of seismic attributes have increased to the extent that it is difficult, if not impossible, for interpreters to examine every seismic line and time slice. To address this problem, several seismic facies classification algorithms including [Formula: see text]-means, self-organizing maps, generative topographic mapping, support vector machines, Gaussian mixture models, and artificial neural networks have been successfully used to extract features of geologic interest from multiple volumes. Although well documented in the literature, the terminology and complexity of these algorithms may bewilder the average seismic interpreter, and few papers have applied these competing methods to the same data volume. We have reviewed six commonly used algorithms and applied them to a single 3D seismic data volume acquired over the Canterbury Basin, offshore New Zealand, where one of the main objectives was to differentiate the architectural elements of a turbidite system. Not surprisingly, the most important parameter in this analysis was the choice of the correct input attributes, which in turn depended on careful pattern recognition by the interpreter. We found that supervised learning methods provided accurate estimates of the desired seismic facies, whereas unsupervised learning methods also highlighted features that might otherwise be overlooked.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document