scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of dezocine in postoperative pain relief: Systematic review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengxi Hao ◽  
Zhongyuan Fan ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
Yongbo Yu ◽  
Yuanzhong Ren ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy index and adverse reactions of dezocine in postoperative pain relief, provide statistical theoretical support for guiding clinical application. Methods: We extracted and analyzed multiple data of patients from the PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for use in randomized controlled trials of various surgical postoperative pain relief. We used meta-analysis to study several measures of efficacy and safety of dezocine, including visual analogue score (VAS), Ramsay sedation score, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), Pulse Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) and the incidence of adverse events(AEs). The material data were calculated and analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results: After exclusion of literature that did not meet the inclusion criteria, our analysis included 14 randomized controlled trials. The Mean Difference (MD) of VAS at 1 h/6 h/24h between the dezocine group and the placebo group was -1.37 (95% CI -2.07,-0.67, P=0.0001),-0.52 (95% CI -1.04,0.01, P=0.05),-0.10 (95% CI -0.39,0.20, P=0.52), respectively. The MD of Ramsay sedation score at 2h/8h was 1.21 (95% CI 0.67,1.75, P<0.0001) and -0.17 (95% CI -0.59,0.26, P=0.44). The MD of MAP at T0/T1/T2 was -0.28 (95% CI -2.46,1.89, P=0.80),-2.66 (95% CI -5.07,-0.25, P=0.03),-4.53 (95% CI -6.17,-2.89, P<0.00001). The MD of HR at T0/T1/T2 was -2.26(95% CI -4.32,-0.21, P=0.03),-3.58(95% CI -5.21,-1.96, P<0.0001),-3.75 (95% CI -11.55,4.04, P=0.35). The MD of SpO2 at T0/T1 was -0.90(95% CI -1.77,-0.03, P=0.04) and 0.36(95% CI 0.02,0.71, P=0.04).The odds ratio (OR) of AEs was 0.53(95% CI 0.39,0.71, P<0.0001). Conclusion: Dezocine shows appropriate anesthetic efficacy and fewer adverse effects, which can reduce postoperative pain effectively.

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Schnabel ◽  
Sylvia U. Reichl ◽  
Daniel M. Poepping ◽  
Peter Kranke ◽  
Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Dan Meng ◽  
Yifei Mao ◽  
Quan-mei Song ◽  
Chun-chun Yan ◽  
Qin-yu Zhao ◽  
...  

Objectives. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TEAS) for postoperative pain in laparoscopy. The review has been registered on the “INPLASY” website and the registration number is INPLASY202150101. Methods. Relevant randomized controlled trials are selected from seven electronic databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP Information, WanFang Data, and Chinese Biomedical Database) from their inception up to November 30, 2020. Twenty-eight studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the statistical analyses and the exploration of heterogeneity sources were conducted by Stata 15.0 software. Besides, the bias assessment of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results. In total, 28 RCTs covering 2787 participants were included. The meta-analysis suggested that TEAS can effectively relieve pain in the short term after laparoscopy, reduce the postoperative consumption of rescue analgesics, improve the quality of life of patients, and shorten the length of hospitalization. And no serious adverse events are related to TEAS. Therefore, TEAS is relatively safe and efficacy for clinical application. The most used acupoints were Hegu (LI14), Neiguan (PC6), and Zusanli (ST36). Conclusions. TEAS can be recommended as a complementary and alternative therapy for the treatment of postoperative pain after laparoscopy. However, the included RCTs had some methodological limitations. Therefore, larger-size, more rigorous, and higher-quality RCTs are needed in the future to further explore the efficacy and safety of TEAS for postoperative pain after laparoscopy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document