scholarly journals Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Alone or Combined with Prostate-Specific Antigen for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sat Prasad Nepal ◽  
Takehiko Nakasato ◽  
Yoshio Ogawa ◽  
Yoshihiro Nakagami ◽  
Takeshi Shichijo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Platelet To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Diagnose Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Insignificant Prostate Cancer

Abstract Background: Many patients undergo unwanted prostate biopsy due to unreliability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). PSA density (PSAD), free PSA, free-to-total PSA ratio, prebiopsy MRI are used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa). Since 1863, correlations between inflammation and cancer have been identified and explored; thus, the role of various blood parameters in detecting cancer has been studied, especially neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Here, we evaluated whether these parameters before prostate biopsy can diagnose prostate cancer in our hospital.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2014 to January 2018. Prostate cancer patients were divided into significant cancer (Gleason Score ≥ 7) and insignificant cancer (Gleason Score < 7). NLR, PLR, and other clinical parameters were taken before the prostate biopsy. We then analyzed the associations of NLR and PLR alone or with PSA, with significant prostate cancer. Results: We included 463 patients, of whom 60.3% (279) had prostate cancer and 75.6 % (211) had a Gleason score (GS) of ≥ 7. PSA and PSAD in the clinically significant prostate cancer patient group were around two times more than those in the insignificant prostate cancer group. PV, NLR, PLR, and combined markers were more in the GS ≥ 7 population group. PSA combined with PLR (PPLR) and PSA with NLR (PNLR) had better area under a curve (AUC) (0.732 and 0.730, resp.), with statistical significance, than PSA, NLR, and PLR alone (0.723, 0.585, and 0.590). In the multivariate analysis using separate models with PSA and NLR or PLR compared to age, DRE-positive lesions, PV, PSAD; PNLR, and PPLR were statistically significant in finding aggressive prostate cancer. When combined markers were used together, despite the high correlations, PSA and NLR were nearly significant (p = 0.062) in detecting the GS ≥ 7 population.Conclusion: The combined use of PSA with PLR and PSA with NLR helps detect the differences between clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer.

scholarly journals The use of prostate specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Yusim ◽  
Muhammad Krenawi ◽  
Elad Mazor ◽  
Victor Novack ◽  
Nicola J. Mabjeesh
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Prostate Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Density ◽  
Clinically Significant

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in men undergoing systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. We retrospectively analyzed data of men who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy because of elevated PSA (≤ 20 ng/ml) or abnormal digital rectal examination. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to compare PSA and PSAD performance and chi-square automatic interaction detector methodologies were used to identify predictors of clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7 or international society of urological pathology grade group ≥ 2). Nine-hundred and ninety-two consecutive men with a median age of 66 years (IQR 61–71) were included in the study. Median PSAD was 0.10 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.10–0.22). Prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 338 men (34%). Clinically significant prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 167 patients (50% of all cancers and 17% of the whole cohort). The AUC to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.64 for PSA and 0.78 for PSAD (P < 0.001). The highest Youden's index for PSAD was at 0.20 ng/ml2 with 70% sensitivity and 79% specificity for the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Men with PSAD < 0.09 ng/ml2 had only 4% chance of having clinically significant disease. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSAD between 0.09 and 0.19 ng/ml2 was significantly higher when prostate volume was less than 33 ml. In conclusion, PSAD was a better predictor than PSA alone of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing TRUS-guided biopsy. Patients with PSAD below 0.09 ng/ml2 were unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer. Combining PSAD in the gray zone (0.09–0.19) with prostate volume below 33 ml adds diagnostic value of clinically significant prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is not a predictor of clinically significant prostate cancer at the prostate biopsy: A large cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Woo Lee ◽  
Hyeon Jeong ◽  
Hwancheol Son ◽  
Min Chul Cho
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Benign Disease ◽  
Large Cohort ◽  
Platelet To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Patient Cohort ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Entire Patient Cohort ◽  
Clinically Significant

AbstractPrevious studies have reported conflicting results on the predictive role of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) at the time of prostate biopsies. We explored the predictive value of pre-biopsy PLRs for CSPCa using our large-cohort database. Consecutive men with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of ≥ 3.0 ng/mL or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) findings and who underwent prostate biopsies were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the pre-biopsy PLR between men with benign disease, clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CISPCa), and CSPCa. Only the subset of CSPCa patients with serum PSA levels of < 10 ng/mL showed lower PLRs than those with benign disease or CISPCa. In the entire patient cohort, multivariate analyses revealed that older age, diabetes mellitus, DRE abnormalities, higher serum PSA levels, and smaller prostate volume were predictors of CSPCa. However, the pre-biopsy PLR was not a significant predictor of CSPCa at the prostate biopsy in the entire patient cohort or the subset of patients with serum PSA levels of < 10 ng/mL. In summary, the pre-biopsy PLR is not an independent predictor of CSPCa at the prostate biopsy, regardless of the serum PSA level.

The role of blood neutrophil count and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive factor for prostate biopsy results

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 158-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koosha Kamali ◽  
Mojtaba Ashrafi ◽  
Pejman Shadpour ◽  
Mojtaba Ameli ◽  
Amirmahdi Khayyamfar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Predictive Factor ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Blood Neutrophil ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

Background: It is apparent that prostate cancer has harmful effects on the erythrocytes, leucocytes, and platelets. In addition, it has been suggested that the toxic granules in neutrophils lead to inflammation in the cancerous tissues besides the activation of monocytes, so in this study we aimed to evaluate the blood neutrophil count besides the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive factor for prostate biopsy results and their relationship with prostate cancer grade in patients undergoing biopsy of the prostate. Methods: For all men with irritative lower urinary tract symptoms visiting Hasheminezhad Hospital from January to July 2015, in case of having a suspicious digital rectal examination or aged above 40 years, prostate-specific antigen was requested and in case of abnormal results, they underwent prostate biopsy. In order to examine the study hypothesis, the blood neutrophil count and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were measured and compared with the abnormal prostate-specific antigen results and suspicious digital rectal examination. Results: Among the 500 referred samples for biopsy, 352 (70.4%) had a negative biopsy result, while it was positive in the other 148 (29.6). The mean neutrophil count showed no statistical difference regarding the biopsy results (p = 0.381). When measuring the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio again with biopsy results, no statistically significant difference was obtained based on the biopsy results (p = 0.112). Conclusion: Neutrophil count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio cannot be predictive factors for positive prostate cancer biopsy.

scholarly journals Evaluation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio prior to prostate biopsy to predict biopsy histology: Results of 1836 patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ilker Gokce ◽  
Nurullah Hamidi ◽  
Evren Suer ◽  
Semih Tangal ◽  
Adil Huseynov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: We evaluate the role of NLR prior to prostate biopsy to predict biopsy histology and Gleason score in patients with prostate cancer.Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated data of patients underwent prostate biopsy between May 2005 and March 2015. We collected the following data: age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy histology, Gleason score (GS) in prostate cancer patients, neutrophil counts, and lymphocyte counts. Patients were grouped as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostate cancer, and prostatitis. The Chi square test was used to compare categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for continuous variables.Results: Data of 1836 patients were investigated. The mean age, total PSA and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of the population were 66.8 ± 8.17 years, 9.38 ± 4.7 ng/dL, and 3.11 ± 1.71, respectively. Patients were divided as follows: 625 in the group with BPH history, 600 in the prostatitis group, and 611 in the prostate cancer histology group. The mean NLR of the prostatitis group was higher compared to the prostate cancer and BPH groups (p = 0.0001). The mean NLR of the prostate cancer group was significantly higher compared to the BPH group (p = 0.002). The GS 8–10 group had a significantly higher mean NLR compared to GS 5–6 (3.64 vs. 2.54, p = 0.0001) and GS 7 (3.64 vs. 2.58, p = 0.0001) patients.Conclusions: NLR was found to differ with regard to histology of prostate biopsy and higher GS was associated with higher NLR in patients with prostate cancer. However prostatitis prevents the use of NLR in predicting prostate cancer before a prostate biopsy. Also, the retrospective nature and lack of multivariate analysis in this study somewhat limits the relevance of these results.

scholarly journals Correlation between Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score

2019 ◽  
pp. 243-248
Author(s):  
PE Ngwu ◽  
GO Achor ◽  
VU Eziefule ◽  
JI Orji ◽  
FT Alozie
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
The Mean ◽  
High Level

Background: Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is a commonly used marker in prostate cancer management. Gleason grading is one of the most powerful predictors of prostatic biological behaviour. PSA, when combined with the Gleason score and clinical stage, improves the prediction of the pathological stage for prostate cancer. Objectives: To assess the degree of correlation between PSA level and Gleason score as well as determine the likelihood of aggressiveness of prostate cancer using Gleason score as a parameter. Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted among 234 consecutive consenting patients presenting to the Urology Out-Patient Clinic between April 2015 and March 2018. Serum PSA was done and patients with values above 4ng/ml and/or abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) were selected to have a prostate biopsy. The sample was histologically analysed with Gleason score recorded for those with prostate cancer. Gleason score was then correlated with PSA levels. Results: The mean age for prostate cancer patients was 71.3±8.7 years. The mean PSA for patients with prostate cancer was 52.3±37.5ng/ml (Confidence Interval = 46.1-58.6) with p<0.001. About 18.2% of histologically confirmed prostate cancer cases had Gleason score 8-10 implying a high level of tumour aggressiveness. There is a positive correlation between PSA and Gleason score with R-value 0.590 indicating a good degree of correlation. Conclusion: There is a good degree of a positive correlation between PSA level and Gleason score, as well as a high level of aggressiveness of prostate cancer in Umuahia.

scholarly journals Analysis of the spatial distribution and clinical features of prostate cancer in transperineal prostate biopsy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Jia-Jun ◽  
Zhu Zai-Sheng ◽  
Zhu Yi-Yi ◽  
Zhou Yi-Bo ◽  
Shi Hong-Qi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Peripheral Zone ◽  
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Total Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Study Results

Abstract Background Recently, most studies on the spatial distribution of the prostate cancer are based on the samples confirmed by transrectal prostate biopsy (TRBx), which could distinguish the distribution of cancer lesions between the apex, middle and basal parts of the prostate, but the distinction between lesions in the left and right sides of prostate cancer and the transitional and peripheral bands remains to be considered. Further, there has been little research on the specific proportion of cancer in prostate biopsy tissue. The current study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics, diagnostic efficacy of relevant indicators, and reveal the spatial distribution of prostate cancer in transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx). Methods A total of 810 patients underwent TPUS-guided 10-core prostate biopsy in our hospital from Oct. 2016-to Feb. 2019, participants' clinical data and the diagnostic yield of the cores were recorded and retrospectively analyzed as a cross-sectional study. Results Age, total prostate specific antigen (t-PSA), prostate volume (PV), prostatic inflammation, dysuria, hematuria, asymptomatic and MRI were independent factors in prostate cancer (Pca) patients compared with non-Pca patients (P<0.05). The cut-off points for age, t-PSA, free prostate specific antigen (f-PSA), PSA density (PSAD), free/total prostate specific antigen (f/t PSA) and PV were 73years old, 15.43ng/ml, 4.545ng/ml, 0.475ng/ml*cm3, 0.123 and 41.45ml, respectively. The PRPN of left peripheral zone (LPZ) prostate tumor was elevated regardless of the Gleason score. However, the PRPN of left transitional zone (LTZ) was lower than LPZ and similar to right peripheral zone (RZ), but PRCF and CFVR were significantly higher, especially in tumors with higher Gleason score (≥8). Conclusions For Chinese, the t-PSA standard and the PSAD standard in the puncture indication should be increased, while the f/t PSA standard should be reduced. At the same time, multi-factor assessment is needed to determine whether patients need a prostate biopsy or not. The spatial distribution of prostate cancer is asymmetrical, with more cancer lesion on the left than on the right. The PRPN of LPZ is relatively higher. LTZ has higher PRCF, and most of them were large lesions with high Gleason score (≥8).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document