Is Early Surgical Intervention Effective for Traumatic Severe Cervical Spinal Cord Injury?

Abstract Background: It is unclear whether early surgery for traumatic severe cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) improves neurological outcomes and reduces complications. This study aimed to determine whether surgery within 24 h improves the neurological prognosis of and reduces the complications associated with surgery for traumatic severe CSCI.Methods: The data of 42 patients with traumatic severe CSCI with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grades of A–B who underwent surgery between December 2007 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The participants were divided into early surgery (< 24 h) and late surgery (> 24 h) groups. With inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using a propensity score adjusted for confounding factors, we compared the AIS grade before and 1 month after surgical treatment as the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and occurrence of respiratory complications and cardiac arrest.Results: In the early surgery group (n = 32, 76%), the average time to surgery was 10.25 h (4–23 h). The IPTW analysis indicated significant differences in neurological improvement according to the AIS grade at 1 month after surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 17.1 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.9–156.7, p = 0.012), ICU-LOS > 7 days (OR: 0.14 95% Cl: 0.02–0.90, p = 0.04), respiratory complications (OR: 0.08 95% Cl: 0.01–0.73, p = 0.03), and cardiac arrest (OR: 0.13 95% Cl: 0.02–0.85, p = 0.03).Conclusion: Early surgery (within 24 h) for traumatic severe CSCI may be effective in improving the neurological prognosis and preventing a long ICU-LOS and postoperative complications.

Download Full-text

Is early surgical intervention effective for traumatic severe cervical spinal cord injury?

10.21203/rs.3.rs-142432/v2 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Koji Yamamoto ◽

akinori okuda ◽

Naoki Maegawa ◽

Hironobu Konishi ◽

Keita Miyazaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Cord ◽

Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Early Surgery ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Respiratory Complications ◽

Cord Injury ◽

Neurological Prognosis

Abstract Background This study aimed to determine whether surgery within 24 h improves the neurological prognosis and reduces the complications associated with surgery for traumatic severe cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). Methods The data of 42 patients with traumatic severe CSCI with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grades of A–B who underwent surgery between December 2007 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The participants were divided into early surgery (< 24 h) and late surgery (> 24 h) groups. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with propensity score adjustment for confounding factors, the AIS grade before and 1 month following surgical treatment as the primary outcome were compared. The secondary outcome was the intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and occurrence of respiratory complications and cardiac arrest. Results In the early surgery group (n = 32, 76%), the average time to surgery was 10.25 h (4–23 h). The IPTW analysis indicated significant differences in neurological improvement according to the AIS grade at 1 month following surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 17.1 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.9–156.7, p = 0.012), ICU-LOS > 7 days (OR: 0.14 95% Cl: 0.02–0.90, p = 0.04), respiratory complications (OR: 0.08 95% Cl: 0.01–0.73, p = 0.03), and cardiac arrest (OR: 0.13 95% Cl: 0.02–0.85, p = 0.03). Conclusions Early surgery (within 24 h) for traumatic severe CSCI may be effective in improving the neurological prognosis, and preventing a long ICU-LOS and postoperative complications.

Download Full-text

Is early surgical intervention effective for traumatic severe cervical spinal cord injury? A retrospective study secondary publication

10.22514/sv.2021.256 ◽

2021 ◽

Keyword(s):

Spinal Cord ◽

Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Early Surgery ◽

Respiratory Complications ◽

Inverse Probability ◽

Cord Injury ◽

Neurological Prognosis

Although early surgery is known to be effective for the treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI), whether it is equally effective in severe CSCI cases remains undetermined. This study aimed to determine whether surgery within 24 h improves the neurological prognosis and reduces the complications associated with surgery for traumatic severe CSCI. The data of 42 patients with traumatic severe CSCI with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A–B who underwent surgery between December 2007 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The participants were classified into early surgery (<24 h) and late surgery (>24 h) groups. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity score adjustment for confounding factors, the AIS grades before and 1 month following surgical treatment, which were considered the primary outcomes, were compared. The secondary outcomes were the intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and occurrence of respiratory complications and cardiac arrest. In the early surgery group (n = 32, 76%), the average time to surgery was 10.25 h (4–23 h). The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis indicated significant differences in the neurological improvement according to the AIS grade at 1 month following surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 17.1, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.9–156.7, p = 0.012), the ICU-LOS >7 days (OR: 0.14, 95% Cl: 0.02–0.90, p = 0.04), and the occurrence of respiratory complications (OR: 0.08, 95% Cl: 0.01–0.73, p = 0.03) and cardiac arrest (OR: 0.13, 95% Cl: 0.02–0.85, p = 0.03). Early surgery (within 24 h) for traumatic severe CSCI may improve the neurological prognosis and prevent a long ICU-LOS and postoperative complications.

Download Full-text

Is Early Surgical Intervention Effective for Traumatic Severe Cervical Spinal Cord Injury? A Retrospective Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-850378/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Koji Yamamoto ◽

Akinori Okuda ◽

Naoki Maegawa ◽

Hironobu Konishi ◽

Keita Miyazaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Cord ◽

Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord ◽

Unit Length ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Early Surgery ◽

Respiratory Complications ◽

Cord Injury ◽

Neurological Prognosis

Abstract Background: Although early surgery is known to be effective for the treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI), whether it is equally effective in severe CSCI cases remains undetermined. This study aimed to determine whether surgery within 24 h improves the neurological prognosis and reduces the complications associated with surgery for traumatic severe CSCI.Methods: The data of 42 patients with traumatic severe CSCI with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A–B who underwent surgery between December 2007 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The participants were classified into early surgery (<24 h) and late surgery (>24 h) groups. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with propensity score adjustment for confounding factors, the AIS grades before and 1 month following surgical treatment, which were considered the primary outcomes, were compared. The secondary outcomes were the intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and occurrence of respiratory complications and cardiac arrest.Results: In the early surgery group (n = 32, 76%), the average time to surgery was 10.25 h (4–23 h). The IPTW analysis indicated significant differences in the neurological improvement according to the AIS grade at 1 month following surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 17.1, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.9–156.7, p = 0.012), the ICU-LOS >7 days (OR: 0.14, 95% Cl: 0.02–0.90, p = 0.04), and the occurrence of respiratory complications (OR: 0.08, 95% Cl: 0.01–0.73, p = 0.03) and cardiac arrest (OR: 0.13, 95% Cl: 0.02–0.85, p = 0.03).Conclusions: Early surgery (within 24 h) for traumatic severe CSCI may improve the neurological prognosis and prevent a long ICU-LOS and postoperative complications.

Download Full-text

A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2018/5895830 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-10 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yan Wang ◽

Zhiliang Guo ◽

Dehong Fan ◽

Haijiang Lu ◽

Dong Xie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Cord ◽

Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Influencing Factors ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cervical Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Thoracic Injury ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Respiratory Complications ◽

Cord Injury

Background. Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis. Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI. However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after CSCI has not been reached. Objective. This meta-analysis study assessed the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. Methods. We searched for relevant studies on the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Sixteen eligible studies containing 9697 patients with CSCI were selected. The pooled OR (MD) and 95% CI of the influencing factors were as follows: age (mean ± SD): -0.98 (-4.00 to 2.03), advanced age: 1.93 (0.80 to 4.63), sex (male): 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A grade: 7.79 (5.28 to 11.50), AIS B grade: 1.15 (1.13 to 2.02), AIS C grade: 0.28 (0.20 to 0.41), AIS D grade: 0.04 (0.02 to 0.09), neurological level of injury (upper CSCI): 2.36 (1.51 to 3.68), injury severity score (ISS): 8.97 (8.11 to 9.82), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8: 6.03 (2.19 to 16.61), thoracic injury: 1.78 (1.55 to 2.04), brain injury: 0.96 (0.55 to 1.69), respiratory complications: 5.97 (4.03 to 8.86), smoking history: 1.45 (0.99 to 2.13), traffic accident injury: 1.27 (0.92 to 1.74), and fall injury: 0.72 (0.52 to 1.01). Conclusions. The current evidence shows that male sex, AIS A grade, AIS B grade, neurological level of injury (upper CSCI), high ISS, GCS≤8, thoracic injury, and respiratory complications are risk factors for tracheostomy after CSCI, and AIS C grade and AIS D grade are protective factors. This study will allow us to use these factors for tracheostomy decisions and ultimately optimize airway management in patients with CSCI.

Download Full-text