scholarly journals Clinical Study of Unilateral Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ELIF) Revision For Lumbar Disc Herniation After Primary Discectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qilin Lu ◽  
Jin Tang ◽  
Long Chen ◽  
Xiao-zhen Wang ◽  
Yi-liang Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Volume ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Incomplete Removal

Abstract Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common spinal disorder. The discectomy with non-fusion operation is widely used. When the revision is needed, the options for revision way is still controversial. This study aims to introduce unilateral extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ELIF) revision surgery, and to investigate the clinical efficacy and complication of Unilateral Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ELIF) in revising primary discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Methods:16 patients with incomplete removal and recurrence herniation of lumbar disc after minimally invasive treatment without fixation were treated by ELIF with unilateral pedicle screw(UPS) from April 2016 to October 2020. All those patietns including 11 male and 5 female aged 29-65 years were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical effects were evaluated by operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood volume of drainage and complications. The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were documented before, after surgery and at last follow--up. Results: The operation time was 95.73±10.5 min, the bleeding volume was 201.5±27.6 ml. Postoperative blood volume of drainage was 50.7±6.3 ml. 2 patients suffered dura tear. All patients were followed up for 12-26 months with 15.7 on average. VAS and ODI scores significantly improved at the preoperative, postoperative and the 12th month’s follow up (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of ELIF with unilateral fixation is a satisfied way to revise primary discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. However, the dura tear induced by scar tissue adhesion needs to be noticed.

scholarly journals Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Wang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Tang ◽  
Haifei Cao ◽  
Qinyong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The area which located at the medial pedicle, posterior vertebral body and ventral hemilamina is defined as the hidden zone. Surgical management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation (HZLDH) is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) technique for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with HZLDH were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and fragment were visually exposed using MELS. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 (18–24) months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is safe and effective in the management of HZLDH. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Wang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Tang ◽  
Haifei Cao ◽  
Qinyong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Surgical management of lumbar disc herniation in the hidden zone is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce a safe and effective technique named microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes within a two year follow-up period. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with hidden zone lumbar disc herniation were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and herniated fragment were visually exposed using this extra-laminar approach. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 months, ranging from 18 to 24 months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is a safe and effective method in the management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

scholarly journals Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation With Spinal Stenosisto Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Technique: a Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baojie Shen ◽  
Xuwei Pan ◽  
Di Ruan ◽  
Danfeng Dai ◽  
Xiaoliang Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lower Extremities ◽  
Surgical Instruments ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background: This paper is to describe Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with spinal stenosis and to investigate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of this kind of lumbar disc herniation with spinal stenosis in elderly patients. Method: Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data of patients receiving UBE or PEID treatment at the First People's Hospital of Yuhang District, Hangzhou, China, from July 2018 to June 2020 was performed. Result: The operation time of the UBE group was better than that of the PEID group (P<0.05). Based on the comparative analysis between the two groups, both the ODI score and the pain index were not statistically significant (P>0.05) but the intra-group comparison before and after the treatment was statistically significant (P<0.05). No marked intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in the UBE group. In the PEID group, one patient developed transient pain in the lower extremities 3 days after surgery, while another patient developed numbness and discomfort in the lower extremities. Both groups were treated conservatively and recovered. During the follow-up, there were no serious adverse events that required another operation. Conclusion: UBE technology can achieve the same clinical effects as percutaneous endoscopic technology in the treatment of LDH with spinal stenosis. UBE technology is easy to apply during operation. For surgical instruments, UBE can not only use special instruments for endoscopes but also relaxes the conditions for application and use of open surgical instruments. During the operation, the operation is more effective and safe, and the learning curve is milder than that of the percutaneous endoscopic technique, which can be used as one of the options for surgical treatment of LDH and spinal stenosis in the future.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation, Functional Outcome and Complications of MicroEndoscopic Discectomy(MED) in Single or Double Level Lumbar Disc Herniation- A Retrospective Review of 156 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Microendoscopic Discectomy

Introduction: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common causes for low back pain and related disabilities. Surgery is indicated in patients who do not respond to the conservative measures for at least 6 weeks or symptoms are worsened. Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is a well-accepted minimally invasive surgical technique with similar results compared to open surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome, functional improvement and analyze complications during MED. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 156 patients who were operated for single or double level LDH using MED between 2016 and 2018. All patients were evaluated for pain and disability using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI), respectively. Modified MabNab’s criteria used to evaluate overall outcome of surgery. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), hospital stay and time to return back to previous activities were evaluated. Complications and revisions were noted during follow-up to analyze clinical results. Paired t-test was used to evaluate statistical difference in VAS and ODI score during follow-up. Results: All patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter postoperatively. Average follow-up was 25.5±9.7 months and average age was 45.0±12.7 years. Average VAS scores improved significantly from preoperative 8.7±0.8 to 2.0±1.1 postoperatively (p<0.0001). Average preoperative ODI improved significantly from 53.8±6.1 to 22.6±5.1 postoperatively (p<0.0001). Both score were maintained at the final follow-up. The average time to return to previous activity level was 35.7±14.3 days. Average operation time, EBL and hospital stay were 57.6±14.6 minutes, 36.7±13.1 mL and 2.4±0.7 days, respectively. There were total 19 (12.2%) complications and 12 (7.7%) revisions in the series. Overall clinical outcome was excellent, good, fair and poor in 73.1%, 20.5%, 5.1% and 1.3% of cases using modi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document