Development and Validation of a New Method for Visual Acuity Assessment on Tablet in Pediatric Population: eMOVA Test

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
NOEMIE STOLL ◽  
Claude SPEEG-SCHATZ ◽  
Elsa Di Foggia ◽  
Arnaud Sauer

Abstract Background Amblyopia is a major public health problem. Its screening and management require reliable methods of assessing visual acuity. Many tests are available, some of which are used as a reference and the advent of new technologies sees many others whose validity is not proven. The objective of our study was to develop a tablet-based visual acuity test adapted to the pediatric population: the eMOVA test (electronic Measurement Of Visual Acuity). Methods We did a study comparing the eMOVA test with the Rossano-Weiss test. All children aged 3 to 8 attending the ophthalmic and pediatric consultation between September 2016 and June 2017 were included. The results in terms of visual acuity were compared as well as the duration of each test, its comprehension, its acceptability and the attention of the child during the test. Results The eMOVA test overestimated visual acuity by 0.06 logMAR. This difference, statistically significant, was not clinically relevant. The duration of the eMOVA test was longer than the reference test, but it was less painful and more appreciated by children and their parents. Conclusion The e-MOVA test appears as a reliable method of assessing visual acuity that could be used both in consultation and on a larger scale in the context of screening as well as for the care of the most difficult children.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
NOEMIE STOLL ◽  
Claude SPEEG-SCHATZ ◽  
Elsa Di Foggia ◽  
Arnaud Sauer

Abstract Background Amblyopia is a major public health problem. Its screening and management require reliable methods of assessing visual acuity. Many tests are available, some of which are used as a reference and the advent of new technologies sees many others whose validity is not proven. The objective of our study was to develop a tablet-based visual acuity test adapted to the pediatric population: the eMOVA test (electronic Measurement Of Visual Acuity). Methods We did a study comparing the eMOVA test with the Rossano-Weiss test. All children aged 3 to 8 attending the ophthalmic and pediatric consultation between September 2016 and June 2017 were included. The results in terms of visual acuity were compared as well as the duration of each test, its comprehension, its acceptability and the attention of the child during the test. Results The eMOVA test overestimated visual acuity by 0.06 logMAR. This difference, statistically significant, was not clinically relevant. The duration of the eMOVA test was longer than the reference test, but it was less painful and more appreciated by children and their parents. Conclusion The e-MOVA test appears as a reliable method of assessing visual acuity that could be used both in consultation and on a larger scale in the context of screening as well as for the care of the most difficult children.


2015 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Bastawrous ◽  
Hillary K. Rono ◽  
Iain A. T. Livingstone ◽  
Helen A. Weiss ◽  
Stewart Jordan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
NOEMIE STOLL ◽  
Elsa Di Foggia ◽  
Claude Speeg-Schatz ◽  
Hélène Meunier ◽  
Adam Rimele ◽  
...  

Abstract IntroductionAmblyopia is a major public health concern. Its screening and management require reliable methods of visual acuity assessment. New technologies offer nowadays many tests available on different app stores for smartphone or tablet but most of them often lack of scientific validation for a medical use. The aim of our study was to attempt validating a tablet-based visual acuity test adapted to the pediatric population: the eMOVA test (electronic Measurement Of Visual Acuity) by comparing visual acuity measured with more conventional test.MethodsA cohort of 100 children aged 3 to 8 attending the ophthalmic-pediatric for eye examination between September 2016 and June 2017 were included in the study. Near visual acuity was assessed on participants using both the eMOVA test and a Standard test (Rossano-Weiss test). Duration of each test, its comprehension, its acceptability and the attention of the child during the test was also investigated.ResultsThe eMOVA test overestimated visual acuity by 0.06 logMAR. This difference, statistically significant, was not clinically relevant. The duration of the eMOVA test was longer than the reference test, but less painful and preferred by children and their parents compared to standard tests.ConclusionThe eMOVA test appears as a reliable test to assess near visual acuity in children. By its portability and efficiency, this application proved to be a relevant tool to be used for children eye examination in daily routine at the hospital.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Han ◽  
Jane Scheetz ◽  
Stuart Keel ◽  
Chimei Liao ◽  
Chi Liu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeong-Min Hwang ◽  
Young Joo Shin ◽  
In Bum Lee ◽  
Won Ryang Wee ◽  
Jin Hak Lee

1955 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence T. Odland ◽  
Louise L. Sloan

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (0) ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
Yuriko Hanada ◽  
Fumiatsu Maeda ◽  
Kazuko Haruishi ◽  
Ichiro Watanabe ◽  
Junichi Kiryu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document