scholarly journals The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharare Taheri Moghadam ◽  
Farnia Velayati ◽  
Farahnaz Sadoughi ◽  
Seyedjafar Ehsanzadeh ◽  
Shayan Poursharif
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Prescription Medications ◽  
Physician Practice ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Practice Performance ◽  
Practice Behavior

Abstract Background: The clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) for prescription medications is one of the technologies aimed at improving physician practice behavior and patient outcomes by reducing drug prescription errors. This study, thus, was conducted to investigate the effect of various CDSSs on physician practice behavior and patient outcomes.Methods: This systematic review was conducted by searching in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2019. Two researchers independently evaluated the studies. Any discrepancies over the eligibility of the studies between the two researchers were then resolved by consulting a third researcher. Finally, we extracted data from the articles. Then, we conducted a meta-analysis based on medication subgroups and outcome categories; we also presented a narrative form of the findings. Meanwhile, we applied random-effects model to estimate the effects of CDSS on patient outcomes and physician practice performance with 95% confidence interval. Q statistics and I2 was then used to measure heterogeneity.Results: Based on the inclusion criteria, 46 studies were considered eligible for the analysis in this review. The CDSS for prescription medications had been used for various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases, AIDS, appendicitis, kidney disease, malaria, high blood potassium, and mental disease. Meanwhile, other cases such as the concurrent prescription of multiple drugs for patients and its effects on the above-mentioned outcomes were evaluated. The analysis shows that in some cases the application of CDSS provides positive effects on patient outcomes and physician practice behaviors. The effect was statistically significant (std diff in means =0.114, 95% CI: 0.090 to 0.138) as overall. It was also statistically significant for outcome groups such as those showing improved outcomes on physician practice performance and patient outcome or both. No significant difference was observed in comparison between some other cases and conventional methods. We think that this could be due to the disease type, the quantity, and the type of CDSS requirements that influenced the comparison. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that positive effects of the CDSS are due to factors such as user-friendliness, compliance with clinical guidelines, patient and doctor cooperation, integration of electronic health records, CDSS and pharmaceutical systems, consideration of the views of physicians in assessing the importance of CDSS alerts, and their real-time alerts in the prescription.

scholarly journals The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharare Taheri Moghadam ◽  
Farahnaz Sadoughi ◽  
Farnia Velayati ◽  
Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadeh ◽  
Shayan Poursharif
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Physician Practice ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Practice Performance

Abstract Background Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) for Prescribing are one of the innovations designed to improve physician practice performance and patient outcomes by reducing prescription errors. This study was therefore conducted to examine the effects of various CDSSs on physician practice performance and patient outcomes. Methods This systematic review was carried out by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2019. The studies were independently reviewed by two researchers. Any discrepancies in the eligibility of the studies between the two researchers were then resolved by consulting the third researcher. In the next step, we performed a meta-analysis based on medication subgroups, CDSS-type subgroups, and outcome categories. Also, we provided the narrative style of the findings. In the meantime, we used a random-effects model to estimate the effects of CDSS on patient outcomes and physician practice performance with a 95% confidence interval. Q statistics and I2 were then used to calculate heterogeneity. Results On the basis of the inclusion criteria, 45 studies were qualified for analysis in this study. CDSS for prescription drugs/COPE has been used for various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases, AIDS, appendicitis, kidney disease, malaria, high blood potassium, and mental diseases. In the meantime, other cases such as concurrent prescribing of multiple medications for patients and their effects on the above-mentioned results have been analyzed. The study shows that in some cases the use of CDSS has beneficial effects on patient outcomes and physician practice performance (std diff in means = 0.084, 95% CI 0.067 to 0.102). It was also statistically significant for outcome categories such as those demonstrating better results for physician practice performance and patient outcomes or both. However, there was no significant difference between some other cases and traditional approaches. We assume that this may be due to the disease type, the quantity, and the type of CDSS criteria that affected the comparison. Overall, the results of this study show positive effects on performance for all forms of CDSSs. Conclusions Our results indicate that the positive effects of the CDSS can be due to factors such as user-friendliness, compliance with clinical guidelines, patient and physician cooperation, integration of electronic health records, CDSS, and pharmaceutical systems, consideration of the views of physicians in assessing the importance of CDSS alerts, and the real-time alerts in the prescription.

scholarly journals The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharare Taheri Moghadam ◽  
Farnia Velayati ◽  
Farahnaz Sadoughi ◽  
S.J. Ehsanzadeh ◽  
Shayan Poursharif
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Prescription Medications ◽  
Physician Practice ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Practice Behavior ◽  
Multiple Drugs

Abstract Background The clinical decision support systems(CDSSs) for prescription medications is one of the technologies aimed at improving physician practice behavior and patient outcomes by reducing drug prescription errors. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of various CDSSs on physician practice behavior and patient outcomes.Methods This systematic review was conducted by searching in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library from January 2005 to November 2019. Two researchers independently evaluated the studies. Any discrepancies over the eligibility of the studies between the two researchers were then resolved by consulting a third researcher. Finally, data were extracted from the articles; however, we could not able to conduct meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of the studies and the narrative form of the findings.Results Based on the inclusion criteria, 46 studies were considered eligible for the analysis in this review. The CDSS for prescription medications had been used for various diseases, namely cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases, AIDS, appendicitis, kidney disease, malaria, high blood potassium, mental disease. Meanwhile, other cases such as the concurrent prescription of multiple drugs for the patient and its effects on the above-mentioned outcomes were evaluated. The analysis shows that in some cases the application of CDSS provides positive effects on patient outcomes and physician practice behaviors. No significant difference was observed in comparison between some other cases and conventional methods. We think that this could be due to the disease type, the quantity and type of CDSS requirements that influence the comparison.Conclusions Our findings suggest that the positive effects of the CDSS are due to factors such as user-friendliness, compliance with clinical guidelines, patient and doctor cooperation, integration of electronic health records, CDSS and pharmaceutical systems, consideration of the views of physicians in assessing the importance of CDSS alerts and their real-time alerts in the prescription.Registration number on PROSPERO CRD42018079936.

scholarly journals ­­The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharare Taheri Moghadam ◽  
Farahnaz Sadoughi ◽  
Farnia Velayati ◽  
Seyedjafar Ehsanzadeh ◽  
Shayan Poursharif
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Physician Practice ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Practice Performance

Abstract Background: Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) for Prescribing are one of the innovations designed to improve physician practice performance and patient outcomes by reducing prescription errors. This study was therefore conducted to examine the effects of various CDSSs on physician practice performance and patient outcomes.Methods: This systematic review was carried out by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2019. The studies were independently reviewed by two researchers. Any discrepancies in the eligibility of the studies between the two researchers were then resolved by consulting the third researcher. In the next step, we performed a meta-analysis based on medication subgroups, CDSS-type subgroups, and outcome categories. Also, we provided the narrative style of the findings. In the meantime, we used a random-effects model to estimate the effects of CDSS on patient outcomes and physician practice performance with a 95% confidence interval. Q statistics and I2 were then used to calculate heterogeneity.Results: On the basis of the inclusion criteria, 45 studies were qualified for analysis in this study. CDSS for prescription drugs/COPE has been used for various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases, AIDS, appendicitis, kidney disease, malaria, high blood potassium, and mental diseases. In the meantime, other cases such as concurrent prescribing of multiple medications for patients and their effects on the above-mentioned results have been analyzed. The study shows that in some cases the use of CDSS has beneficial effects on patient outcomes and physician practice performance (std diff in means = 0.084, 95% CI: 0.067 to 0.102). It was also statistically significant for outcome categories such as those demonstrating better results for physician practice performance and patient outcomes or both. However, there was no significant difference between some other cases and traditional approaches. We assume that this may be due to the disease type, the quantity, and the type of CDSS criteria that affected the comparison. Overall, the results of this study show positive effects on performance for all forms of CDSSs. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the positive effects of the CDSS can be due to factors such as user-friendliness, compliance with clinical guidelines, patient and physician cooperation, integration of electronic health records, CDSS, and pharmaceutical systems, consideration of the views of physicians in assessing the importance of CDSS alerts, and the real-time alerts in the prescription.

scholarly journals ­The effects of clinical decision support system for prescribing medication on patient outcomes and physician practice performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharare Taheri Moghadam ◽  
Farahnaz Sadoughi ◽  
Farnia Velayati ◽  
Seyedjafar Ehsanzadeh ◽  
Shayan Poursharif
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Physician Practice ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Practice Performance ◽  
Multiple Drugs

Abstract Background: The clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) for prescribing is one of the technologies aimed at improving physician practice performance and patient outcomes by reducing medication prescription errors. This study, thus, was conducted to investigate the effect of various CDSSs on physician practice performance and patient outcomes.Methods: This systematic review was conducted by searching in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2019. Two researchers independently evaluated the studies. Any discrepancies over the eligibility of the studies between the two researchers were then resolved by consulting a third researcher. Finally, we extracted data from the articles. Then, we conducted a meta-analysis based on medication subgroups, CDSS type subgroups, and outcome categories. Also, we presented a narrative form of the findings. In the meantime, we applied random-effects model to estimate the effects of CDSS on patient outcomes and physician practice performance with 95% confidence interval. Q statistics and I2 were then used to measure heterogeneity.Results: Based on the inclusion criteria, 45 studies were considered eligible for the analysis in this review. The CDSS for prescribing medications/COPE were used for various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases, AIDS, appendicitis, kidney disease, malaria, high blood potassium, and mental diseases. Meanwhile, other cases such as the concurrent prescription of multiple drugs for patients and its effects on the above-mentioned outcomes were evaluated. The analysis shows that in some cases the application of CDSS provides positive effects on patient outcomes and physician practice performance (std diff in means = 0.114, 95% CI: 0.090 to 0.138). Also, it was statistically significant for outcome groups such as those showing improved outcomes on physician practice performance and patient outcome or both. However, no significant difference was observed between some other cases and conventional methods. We think that this could be due to the disease type, the quantity, and the type of CDSS requirements that influenced the comparison. Overall, all types of CDSSs have positive effects on outcomes including combinational types and other types that only cause messages when appropriate and necessary.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that positive effects of the CDSS can be attributed to factors such as user-friendliness, compliance with clinical guidelines, patient and physician cooperation, integration of electronic health records, CDSS and pharmaceutical systems, consideration of the views of physicians in assessing the importance of CDSS alerts, and the real-time alerts in the prescription.

Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems and Antibiotic Prescribing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Carracedo-Martinez ◽  
Christian Gonzalez-Gonzalez ◽  
Antonio Teixeira-Rodrigues ◽  
Jesus Prego-Dominguez ◽  
Bahi Takkouche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing

scholarly journals Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review of experimental and observational studies

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e053886
Author(s):  
Teumzghi F Mebrahtu ◽  
Sarah Skyrme ◽  
Rebecca Randell ◽  
Anne-Maree Keenan ◽  
Karen Bloor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Comparative Research ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Allied Health Professional

ObjectiveComputerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are an increasingly important part of nurse and allied health professional (AHP) roles in delivering healthcare. The impact of these technologies on these health professionals’ performance and patient outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate this.Materials and methodsThe following bibliographic databases and grey literature sources were searched by an experienced Information Professional for published and unpublished research from inception to February 2021 without language restrictions: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase Classic+Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), HMIC (Ovid), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley), Social Sciences Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate), ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Abstracts & Index, ProQuest ASSIA (Applied Social Science Index and Abstract), Clinical Trials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry (ICTRP), Health Services Research Projects in Progress (HSRProj), OpenClinical(www.OpenClinical.org), OpenGrey (www.opengrey.eu), Health.IT.gov, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (www.ahrq.gov). Any comparative research studies comparing CDSS with usual care were eligible for inclusion.ResultsA total of 36 106 non-duplicate records were identified. Of 35 included studies: 28 were randomised trials, three controlled-before-and-after studies, three interrupted-time-series and one non-randomised trial. There were ~1318 health professionals and ~67 595 patient participants in the studies. Most studies focused on nurse decision-makers (71%) or paramedics (5.7%). CDSS as a standalone Personal Computer/LAPTOP-technology was a feature of 88.7% of the studies; only 8.6% of the studies involved ‘smart’ mobile/handheld-technology.DiscussionCDSS impacted 38% of the outcome measures used positively. Care processes were better in 47% of the measures adopted; examples included, nurses’ adherence to hand disinfection guidance, insulin dosing, on-time blood sampling and documenting care. Patient care outcomes in 40.7% of indicators were better; examples included, lower numbers of falls and pressure ulcers, better glycaemic control, screening of malnutrition and obesity and triaging appropriateness.ConclusionCDSS may have a positive impact on selected aspects of nurses’ and AHPs’ performance and care outcomes. However, comparative research is generally low quality, with a wide range of heterogeneous outcomes. After more than 13 years of synthesised research into CDSS in healthcare professions other than medicine, the need for better quality evaluative research remains as pressing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document