Prediction Score Project for the Incidence of Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Zhao ◽  
Chen Liu ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Zhaoxue Sheng ◽  
Jiannan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
History Of

Abstract BackgroundWe sought to develop and validate a novel marker-based risk score to improve stroke prognostication in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsA retrospective study was conducted and internally validated a new biomarker-based risk score for the incidence of stroke in 4103 patients with MI undergoing primary PCI who were randomized into a derivation and a validation cohort. Predictive values of markers and clinical variables were evaluated using Cox regression models and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. The most important variables were included in the score, with weight proportional to the model coefficients.ResultsSignificant predictors of the incidence of cerebrovascular events were age, history of atrial fibrillation, history of hypertension, Killip class, blood pressure group, target lesion involving branches, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and thrombus aspiration. The models had good calibration and discrimination in derivation and internal validation. The areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for predicting cerebrovascular events were 0.773 and 0.766 for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively, at 5-year follow-up. Survival ROC curves exported the best cut-off values and divided them into low-risk and high-risk groups using the R language. We conducted Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for the two groups. Both groups displayed significant difference in the derivation and validation cohorts (P=0.00003 and P=0.009, respectively). We compared the new prediction model to the CHADS-VASc score; the AUCs were 0.773 and 0.754, respectively.ConclusionThe prediction model was internally validated and calibrated in large cohorts of patients with MI receiving primary PCI therapy. This risk score incorporates allows re-evaluation of the risk of cerebrovascular events after undergoing primary PCI.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics and long-term mortality of patients with midrange ejection fraction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Vratonjic ◽  
D Milasinovic ◽  
M Asanin ◽  
V Vukcevic ◽  
S Zaharijev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Background Previous studies associated midrange ejection fraction (mrEF) with impaired prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Purpose Our aim was to assess clinical profile and short- and long-term mortality of patients with mrEF after STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This analysis included 8148 patients admitted for primary PCI during 2009–2019, from a high-volume tertiary center, for whom echocardiographic parameters obtained during index hospitalization were available. Midrange EF was defined as 40–49%. Adjusted Cox regression models were used to assess 30-day and 5-year mortality hazard of mrEF, with the reference category being preserved EF (>50%). Results mrEF was present in 29.8% (n=2 427), whereas low ejection fraction (EF<40%) was documented in 24.7% of patients (n=2 016). mrEF was associated with a higher baseline risk as compared with preserved EF patients, but lower when compared with EF<40%, in terms of prior MI (14.5% in mrEF vs. 9.9% in preserved EF vs. 24.2% in low EF, p<0.001), history of diabetes (26.5% vs. 21.2% vs. 30.0%, p<0.001), presence of Killip 2–4 on admission (15.7% vs. 6.9% vs. 26.5%, p<0.001) and median age (61 vs. 59 vs. 64 years, p<0.001). At 30 days, mortality was comparable in mrEF vs. preserved EF group, while it was significantly higher in the low EF group (2.7% vs. 1.6% vs. 9.4%, respectively, p<0.001). At 5 years, mrEF patients had higher crude mortality rate as compared with preserved EF, but lower in comparison with low EF (25.1% vs. 17.0% vs. 48.7%, p<0.001) (Figure). After adjusting for the observed baseline differences mrEF was independently associated with increased mortality at 5 years (HR 1.283, 95% CI: 1.093–1.505, p=0.002), but not at 30 days (HR 1.444, 95% CI: 0.961–2.171, p<0.001). Conclusion Patients with mrEF after primary PCI for STEMI have a distinct baseline clinical risk profile, as compared with patients with reduced (<40%) and preserved (≥50%) EF. Importantly, mrEF did not have a significant impact on short-term mortality following STEMI, but it did independently predict the risk of 5-year mortality. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Employee Scheme Insurance Beneficiaries in India

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (46) ◽  
pp. 2685-2689
Author(s):  
Lachikarathman Devegowda ◽  
Satvic Cholenahally Manjunath ◽  
Anindya Sundar Trivedi ◽  
Ramesh D ◽  
Shanmugam Krishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

BACKGROUND We wanted to assess the clinical profile and in-hospital outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in India in ESI (Employee Scheme Insurance) beneficiaries. METHODS From January 2017 to July 2018, 122 consecutive acute STEMI patients undergoing PPCI under ESI scheme were included in the study. Patients’ clinical profile, detailed procedural characteristics, time variables along with in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were also assessed. RESULTS 122 patients underwent primary PCI during the study period. In the study, mean age was 55.23 (27 - 85) years; 94 (77.04 %) were males; 53 (43.44 %) were hypertensives; 38 (31.14 %) were smokers; and 44 (36.06 %) were diabetics. Ten (8.19 %) patients were in cardiogenic shock (CS). Anterior myocardial infarction was present in 70 (57.37 %) patients. The median chest-pain-onset to hospitalarrival-time was 270 (70 - 720), door-to-balloon time was 55 (20 - 180) and total ischemic time was 325 (105 - 780) minutes. In-hospital adverse events occurred in 14 (11.4 %) patients [death 8 (6.55 %), major bleeding 2 (1.63 %), urgent CABG 3 (2.45 %) and stroke 1 (0.81 %)]. Seven patients with cardiogenic shock died. CONCLUSIONS The mean age of our cohort was 55.23 years. In our study, majority of patients were males (77.05 %), hypertension was associated with 43.44 %, and diabetes was associated with 36.06 % of patients. Procedural success was achieved in 95.89 %. The overall in-hospital mortality was 6.55 % and 70 % in the cardiogenic shock subset. KEYWORDS Primary PCI, STEMI, ESI, PCI

scholarly journals Evaluation of a regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction primary percutaneous coronary intervention program at the Rouge Valley Health System

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pria MD Nippak ◽  
Jodie Pritchard ◽  
Robin Horodyski ◽  
Candace J Ikeda-Douglas ◽  
Winston W Isaac
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Door To Balloon

Background ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains the second leading cause of death in Canada. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been recognized as an effective method for treating STEMI. Improved access to primary PCI can be achieved through the implementation of regional PCI centres, which was the impetus for implementing the PCI program in an east Toronto hospital in 2009. As such, the purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of this program regional expansion. Methods A retrospective review of 101 patients diagnosed with STEMI from May to Sept 2010 was conducted. The average door-to-balloon time for these STEMI patients was calculated and the door-to-balloon times using different methods of arrival were analyzed. Method of arrival was by one of three ways: paramedic initiated referral; patient walk-ins to PCI centre emergency department; or transfer after walk-in to community hospital emergency department. Results The study found that mean door-to balloon time for PCI was 112.5 minutes. When the door-to-balloon times were compared across the three arrival methods, patients who presented by paramedic-initiated referral had significantly shorter door-to-balloon times, (89.5 minutes) relative to those transferred (120.9 minutes) and those who walked into a PCI centre (126.7 minutes) (p = 0.047). Conclusions The findings suggest that the partnership between the hospital and its EMS partners should be continued, and paramedic initiated referral should be expanded across Canada and EMS systems where feasible, as this level of coverage does not currently exist nationwide. Investments in regional centres of excellence and the creation of EMS partnerships are needed to enhance access to primary PCI.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction primary percutaneous coronary intervention program at the Rouge Valley Health System

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pria MD Nippak ◽  
Jodie Pritchard ◽  
Robin Horodyski ◽  
Candace J Ikeda-Douglas ◽  
Winston W Isaac
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Door To Balloon

Background ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains the second leading cause of death in Canada. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been recognized as an effective method for treating STEMI. Improved access to primary PCI can be achieved through the implementation of regional PCI centres, which was the impetus for implementing the PCI program in an east Toronto hospital in 2009. As such, the purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of this program regional expansion. Methods A retrospective review of 101 patients diagnosed with STEMI from May to Sept 2010 was conducted. The average door-to-balloon time for these STEMI patients was calculated and the door-to-balloon times using different methods of arrival were analyzed. Method of arrival was by one of three ways: paramedic initiated referral; patient walk-ins to PCI centre emergency department; or transfer after walk-in to community hospital emergency department. Results The study found that mean door-to balloon time for PCI was 112.5 minutes. When the door-to-balloon times were compared across the three arrival methods, patients who presented by paramedic-initiated referral had significantly shorter door-to-balloon times, (89.5 minutes) relative to those transferred (120.9 minutes) and those who walked into a PCI centre (126.7 minutes) (p = 0.047). Conclusions The findings suggest that the partnership between the hospital and its EMS partners should be continued, and paramedic initiated referral should be expanded across Canada and EMS systems where feasible, as this level of coverage does not currently exist nationwide. Investments in regional centres of excellence and the creation of EMS partnerships are needed to enhance access to primary PCI.

scholarly journals Outcome of inter-hospital transfer versus direct admission for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational study of 25,315 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction from the London Heart Attack Group

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 948-957
Author(s):  
Krishnaraj S Rathod ◽  
Ajay K Jain ◽  
Sam Firoozi ◽  
Pitt Lim ◽  
Richard Boyle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Hospital Transfer ◽  
Direct Admission

Background and aims: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), mortality is directly related to time to reperfusion with guidelines recommending patients be delivered directly to centres for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to describe the impact of inter-hospital transfer on reperfusion time and to assess whether or not treatment delays influenced clinical outcomes in comparison with direct admission to a primary PCI centre in a large regional network. Method and results: We undertook an observational cohort study of patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI between 2005 and 2015 in London, UK. Patient details were recorded at the time of the procedure in databases using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society PCI dataset. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality at a median of 4.1 years (interquartile range: 2.2–5.8 years). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital major adverse cardiac events. Of 25,315 patients, 17,560 (69.4%) were admitted directly to a primary PCI centre and 7755 (31.6%) were transferred from a non-primary PCI centre. Patients in the direct admission group were older and more likely to have left ventricular impairment compared with the inter-hospital transfer group. Median time from call for help to reperfusion in transferred patients was 52 minutes longer compared with patients admitted directly ( p <0.001). However, call to first hospital admission was similar. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly lower mortality rates in patients who were transferred directed to a primary PCI centre compared with patients who were transferred from a non-PCI centre (17.4% direct vs. 18.7% transfer, p=0.017). Furthermore, after propensity matching, direct admission for primary PCI was still a predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.95). Conclusions: In this large registry of over 25,000 STEMI patients treated by primary PCI survival was better in patients admitted directly to a cardiac centre versus patients transferred for primary PCI, most likely due to longer call to balloon times in patient transferred from other hospitals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document