scholarly journals Index Admission Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Our Experience after the Inception of Acute Care Surgery Programme

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aakif ◽  
Zeeshan Razzaq ◽  
James Byrne ◽  
Hamid Mustafa ◽  
Mudassar Majeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Symptomatic Disease ◽  
Care Surgery

Abstract Background: Gallstones are very common and frequently present as acute cholecystitis in up to 20 % of patients with symptomatic disease, with wide variation in severity. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic disease. Although multiple studies have confirmed its safety, LC at index admission is still not widely practiced in Ireland. We present our experience of a cohort of patients who underwent index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Cork University Hospital since the start of the acute care surgery program in May 2017.Aim: To determine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at index admission.Methods: All adult patients who presented to an acute surgical assessment unit (ASAU) with symptomatic gall stone disease and underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy at index admission were included. The duration of this prospective cohort study was 27 months (May 2017 to July 2019). Patient demographics, indication for surgery, post-operative complications and conversion rates were recorded. In addition, timing of imaging, imaging findings and length of hospital stay were also noted.Results: A total of 233 patients underwent laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at index admission for various indications. Median age was 50 years with range between 16 - 88. Male to female ratio was 1: 1.78. 142 (61%) patients had acute cholecystitis, while the other indications were CBD obstruction (15.5%), biliary colic (11%) and acute biliary pancreatitis (10.5%). 93 (40%) patients had pre-op MRCP while 41 (17.6%) underwent pre-op ERCP. All except 3 patients undergoing ERCP had pre-procedure MRCP. 2 patients had intra-operative cholangiograms. Overall morbidity was 4.7%. In terms of complications, 3 (1.3%) patients had bile leak and only 1 (0.85%) had re-operation. There was 1 common bile duct injury and only 1 conversion to open surgery. There was no mortality in this case series. The average length of hospital stay was 5.6 days. (Range 2 to 14 days).Conclusions: Index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, biliary colic and acute biliary pancreatitis, has been a safe and feasible treatment option in our hospital. A safe practice can be ensured by adherence to this care pathway and a multidisciplinary, consultant-led service. Index cholecystectomy service can be provided safely to reduce disease-related morbidity and multiple re-admissions in patients awaiting interval surgery.

scholarly journals Acute Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Delays in Acute Surgery and Cost Analysis of Aproposed New Service

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 261-265
Author(s):  
AJ Cockbain ◽  
AL Young ◽  
E McGinnes ◽  
GJ Toogood
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Acute Surgery ◽  
Symptomatic Gallstone Disease

Acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ALC) is widely considered the most appropriate management for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis as supported by a recent meta-analysis and Cochrane review. Although the benefit of ALC is less clear in patients with biliary colic, few would disagree that earlier cholecystectomy is preferable for most patients with symptomatic gallstone disease. ALC has similar complication rates to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) and a reduced total length of hospital stay. Recurrent symptoms from untreated gallstone disease are common, with the risk of developing more severe complications such as acute cholecystitis, acute pancreatitis or cholangitis while waiting for an operation. It has been reported that patients awaiting ELC after an acute admission have significantly more general practitioner (GP) attendances than those who receive ALC, that they have an average of one emergency department attendance for symptom recurrence and that one in six requires hospital admission due to the severity of recurrent symptoms.

Index Admission Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Our Experience After the Inception of Acute Care Surgery Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aakif ◽  
Zeeshan Razzaq ◽  
James Byrne ◽  
Hamid Mustafa ◽  
Mudassar Majeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Care Surgery

An Acute Care Surgery Dilemma: Immediate Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy In Patients On Anti Platelet Therapy

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 495
Author(s):  
H. Aziz ◽  
B. Joseph ◽  
B. Rawashdeh ◽  
N. Kulvatunyou ◽  
V. Pandit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Anti Platelet Therapy ◽  
Care Surgery

Early versus Delayed Single-Stage Laparoscopic Eradication for Both Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones in Mild Acute Biliary Pancreatitis

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 682-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Griniatsos ◽  
Evangelos Karvounis ◽  
Alberto Isla
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Management ◽  
Significant Difference

Several studies addressed that preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct (CBD) clearance, followed by interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (two-stage approach), constitutes the most common practice in cases of uncomplicated mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Between June 1998 and December 2002, 44 patients (35 females and 9 males with a median age of 62 years) suffering from uncomplicated mild acute biliary pancreatitis were treated in our unit. All patients were electively submitted to surgery after subsidence of the acute symptoms, and for definitive treatment we favored the single-stage laparoscopic management, avoiding preoperative ERCP. All patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). If filling defect(s) were detected in the IOC, a finding suggestive of concomitant choledocholithiasis, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) was added in the same sitting. Twenty patients were operated upon within 2 weeks since the attack of the acute symptoms and constitute the early group (n = 20), whereas 24 patients underwent an operation later on and constitute the delay group (n = 24). We retrospectively compare the safety, effectiveness, and outcome after the single-stage laparoscopic management between the two groups of patients. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone constituted the definitive treatment in 38 patients, while an additional LCBDE was performed in the remaining 6 patients (14%), and all operations were achieved laparoscopically. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of operative time, incidence of concomitant choledocholithiasis, morbidity rate, and postoperative hospital stay. During the follow-up, none of the patients experienced recurrent pancreatitis. In uncomplicated mild acute biliary pancreatitis cases, a single-stage definitive laparoscopic management, avoiding preoperative ERCP, can be safely performed during the same admission, after the improvement of symptoms and local inflammation. Postoperative ERCP should be selectively used in patients in whom the single-stage method failed to resolve the problem.

scholarly journals Timing of Cholecystectomy in Mild Acute Biliary Pancreatitis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Orhan Alimoğlu ◽  
Nuray Colapkulu ◽  
Tunç Eren
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Timing Of Cholecystectomy ◽  
Safe Approach ◽  
First Admission

Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is one of the most common gastrointestinal events that requires acute admission to the hospital with considerable risks of mortality & morbidity. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the treatment of ABP. Our aim was to determine the safety of cholecystectomy during the first admission by performing a review of the current literature. Waiting for 6 - 8 weeks to perform cholecystectomy may result with an increased incidence of recurrent ABP attacks, which may increase morbidity and the length of the hospital stay. On the contrary, cholecystectomy during the index admission for mild ABP appears to be a preferable and safe approach with better surgical outcomes providing a definitive treatment.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Gallbladder Disease During Index Admission- 11 the Optimum Timing for Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Md Ibrahim Siddique ◽  
Md Atiar Rahman ◽  
Md Shahadot Hossain Sheikh ◽  
Khander Manzoor Murshed ◽  
Samia Mubin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Laparoscopic Procedure ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Financial Benefit ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, initially considered a contraindication for the treatment of acute gallbladder disease, is now being practiced for treating acute cholecystitis worldwide. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic procedure in the management of acute gallbladder disease during the index admission in terms of safety and feasibility, hospital stay and the rates of complications and conversion to open cholecystectomy. Methods: Between January 2009 to December 2011, 174 patients (103 female, 71 male) with median age 43.5 years (range 27-73 years) with the diagnosis of acute gallbladder disease underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was made from history, physical findings and ultrasound evidence of acute inflammatory changes. Results: Median time from onset of symptoms to surgery was 70 hours. Median operative time was 76.5 minutes. Conversion rate was 1.7%. Minor post-operative complications occurred in 13.5% cases of laparoscopic procedure, which did not require further intervention. Median post-operative hospital stay was 2.5 days and total length of hospital stay was median 4.4 days. There was no mortality. Conclusion: In expert hands laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease during the index admission is safe with better clinical results, shorter hospital stay and an acceptable conversion and complication rates with additional financial benefit to the patients. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jss.v16i1.14442 Journal of Surgical Sciences (2012) Vol. 16 (1) : 11-17

scholarly journals Impact of an acute Care Surgery Model on the Management of acute Appendicitis in South Korea: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gun-Hee Yi ◽  
Hak-Jae Lee ◽  
Seul Lee ◽  
Jong-Hee Yoon ◽  
Suk-Kyung Hong
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Medical Procedure ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Care Surgery

Abstract Background The acute care surgery (ACS) system is a new model for the prompt management of diseases that require rapid treatment in patients with acute abdomen. This study compared the outcomes and characteristics of the ACS system and traditional on-call system (TROS) for acute appendicitis in South Korea. Methods This single-center, retrospective study included all patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis in 2016 and 2018. The TROS and ACS system were used for the 2016 and 2018 groups, respectively. We retrospectively obtained data on each patient from the electrical medical records. The independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for continuous and non-normally distributed data, respectively.Results In total, 126 patients were included. The time taken to get from the emergency room admission to the operating room, operation times, and postoperative complication rates were similar between both groups. However, the length of the hospital stay was shorter in the ACS group than in the TROS group (4.3±3.2 days vs. 7.2±9.6 days, p=0.039).Conclusions Since the introduction of the ACS system, the length of hospital stay for surgical patients has decreased. This may be due to the application of an integrated medical procedure, such as a new clinical pathway, rather than differences in the surgical techniques.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document