timing of cholecystectomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

58
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim Malik ◽  
Thomas Evans ◽  
Shafquat Zaman ◽  
Misra Budhoo

Abstract Background Gallstone disease is common and affects approximately 10-15% of adults. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) is the definitive management of cholecystitis. NICE and RCS guidance recommend that in patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis a LC should be performed during the same admission or within 7 days. We audited our compliance against these national guidelines. Methods Retrospective audit of all patients admitted with uncomplicated acute cholecystitis over a 4 month period. Patient demographics, admission details, timing of cholecystectomy, complications, follow-up, and re-admission data were collected. Results 50 patients (60% female, 40% male; mean age: 60.7 years) with acute cholecystitis were included. Mean length of stay was 4.8 days. Only 10% had a cholecystectomy within 1 week of diagnosis. Of those discharged without a LC on the index admission, 14% were readmitted with further gallstone related complications (cholangitis, pancreatitis) within 48.6 days from initial discharge. The mean time to surgery after initial discharge was 125.8 days. Conclusion There is poor compliance with NICE guidelines to perform an early LC in our cohort of patients, primarily because of the lack of Trust based guidelines. This audit demonstrates the need to develop a robust ‘hot gallbladder’ pathway within our hospital to improve current practice.


Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2021-324239
Author(s):  
Nora D Hallensleben ◽  
Hester C Timmerhuis ◽  
Robbert A Hollemans ◽  
Sabrina Pocornie ◽  
Janneke van Grinsven ◽  
...  

ObjectiveFollowing an episode of acute biliary pancreatitis, cholecystectomy is advised to prevent recurrent biliary events. There is limited evidence regarding the optimal timing and safety of cholecystectomy in patients with necrotising biliary pancreatitis.DesignA post hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort. Patients with biliary pancreatitis and a CT severity score of three or more were included in 27 Dutch hospitals between 2005 and 2014. Primary outcome was the optimal timing of cholecystectomy in patients with necrotising biliary pancreatitis, defined as: the optimal point in time with the lowest risk of recurrent biliary events and the lowest risk of complications of cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes were the number of recurrent biliary events, periprocedural complications of cholecystectomy and the protective value of endoscopic sphincterotomy for the recurrence of biliary events.ResultsOverall, 248 patients were included in the analysis. Cholecystectomy was performed in 191 patients (77%) at a median of 103 days (P25–P75: 46–222) after discharge. Infected necrosis after cholecystectomy occurred in four (2%) patients with persistent peripancreatic collections. Before cholecystectomy, 66 patients (27%) developed biliary events. The risk of overall recurrent biliary events prior to cholecystectomy was significantly lower before 10 weeks after discharge (risk ratio 0.49 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.90); p=0.02). The risk of recurrent pancreatitis before cholecystectomy was significantly lower before 8 weeks after discharge (risk ratio 0.14 (95% CI 0.02 to 1.0); p=0.02). The complication rate of cholecystectomy did not decrease over time. Endoscopic sphincterotomy did not reduce the risk of recurrent biliary events (OR 1.40 (95% CI 0.74 to 2.83)).ConclusionThe optimal timing of cholecystectomy after necrotising biliary pancreatitis, in the absence of peripancreatic collections, is within 8 weeks after discharge.


Pancreatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S11-S12
Author(s):  
H. Timmerhuis ◽  
N. Hallensleben ◽  
R. Hollemans ◽  
S. Pocornie ◽  
J. van Grinsven ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
BHAVIN VASAVADA ◽  
Hardik Patel

Abstract Introduction: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate outcomes of early versus late cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy.Methods:The study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement and MOOSE guidelines. Heterogeneity was measured using Q tests and I2 statistics. The random-effects model was used.Results: Six studies including 18640 patients were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in overall complications within or after 72 hours cholecystectomy group, but mortality and biliary complications were significantly high in the less than 72 hours group (p=0.05 and 0.0002 respectively). There was no difference in mortality, overall complication, biliary tract complications in less than 1 week versus more than 1 week and less than 10 days versus more than 10 days group. Overall complications were significantly less in the less than 2 weeks group compared to the more than 2 weeks group. There was no difference in mortality and biliary tract complications between less than 2 weeks and more than 2 weeks group. Overall complication rate (risk ratio 0.67, p <0.0001), postoperative mortality (risk ratio 0.46, p=0.003), bile duct injury (risk ratio 0.62, p=0.01) was significantly less in earlier than 4-week group. Hospital stay was not significantly different between less than 4 weeks versus more than 4 weeks group. (Mean difference= -2.74, p=0.12). Ove all complication rates were significantly more in less than 8 weeks group. (Risk ratio 1.07, p=0.01).Conclusion:Early cholecystectomy preferably within 4 weeks after percutaneous cholecystostomy is preferable.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
BHAVIN VASAVADA ◽  
Hardik Patel

Introduction: There is a controversy about the optimum timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate outcomes of early versus late cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystectomy. Methods: The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and MOOSE guidelines. Heterogeneity was measured using Q tests and I2 statistics. The random-effects model was used. We evaluated cholecystectomy performed at different periods after percutaneous cholecystostomy within 72 hours or later, within or after one week or percutaneous cholecystostomy, within 10 days or after 10 days, less than 2 weeks or more than 2 weeks, less than 4 weeks or more than 4 weeks, less than 8 weeks or more than 8 weeks as per literature. Results: Six studies including 18640 patients were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in overall complications within or after 72 hours cholecystectomy group, but mortality and biliary complications were significantly high in the less than 72 hours group (p=0.05 and 0.0002 respectively). There was no difference in mortality, overall complication, biliary tract complications in less than 1 week versus more than 1 week and less than 10 days versus more than 10 days group. Overall complications were significantly less in the less than 2 weeks group compared to the more than 2 weeks group. There was no difference in mortality and biliary tract complications between less than 2 weeks and more than 2 weeks group. Overall complication rate (risk ratio 0.67, p <0.0001), postoperative mortality (risk ratio 0.46, p=0.003), bile duct injury (risk ratio 0.62, p=0.01) was significantly less in earlier than 4-week group. Hospital stay was not significantly different between less than 4 weeks versus more than 4 weeks group. (Mean difference= -2.74, p=0.12). Ove all complication rates were significantly more in less than 8 weeks group. (Risk ratio 1.07, p=0.01). Hospital stay was significantly less in less than 8 weeks group. (Mean difference 0.87, p=0.01). Conclusion: Early cholecystectomy preferably within 4 weeks after percutaneous cholecystostomy is preferable over late cholecystectomy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Borzellino ◽  
Safi Khuri ◽  
Michele Pisano ◽  
Subhi Mansour ◽  
Niccolò Allievi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis has proved to reduce hospital length of stay but with no benefit in morbidity when compared to delayed surgery. However, in the literature, early timing refers to cholecystectomy performed up to 96 h of admission or up to 1 week of the onset of symptoms. Considering the natural history of acute cholecystitis, the analysis based on such a range of early timings may have missed a potential advantage that could be hypothesized with an early timing of cholecystectomy limited to the initial phase of the disease. The review aimed to explore the hypothesis that adopting immediate cholecystectomy performed within 24 h of admission as early timing could reduce post-operative complications when compared to delayed cholecystectomy. Methods The literature search was conducted based on the Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study (PICOS) strategy. Randomized trials comparing post-operative complication rate after early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were included. Studies were grouped based on the timing of cholecystectomy. The hypothesis that immediate cholecystectomy performed within 24 h of admission could reduce post-operative complications was explored by comparing early timing of cholecystectomy performed within and 24 h of admission and early timing of cholecystectomy performed over 24 h of admission both to delayed timing of cholecystectomy within a sub-group analysis. The literature finding allowed the performance of a second analysis in which early timing of cholecystectomy did not refer to admission but to the onset of symptoms. Results Immediate cholecystectomy performed within 24 h of admission did not prove to reduce post-operative complications with relative risk (RR) of 1.89 and its 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.76; 4.71]. When the timing was based on the onset of symptoms, cholecystectomy performed within 72 h of symptoms was found to significantly reduce post-operative complications compared to delayed cholecystectomy with RR = 0.60 [95% CI 0.39;0.92]. Conclusion The present study failed to confirm the hypothesis that immediate cholecystectomy performed within 24 h of admission may reduce post- operative complications unless surgery could be performed within 72 h of the onset of symptoms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-280
Author(s):  
Fady E. Daniel ◽  
Maher W. Malaeb ◽  
Mohammad N. Hosni ◽  
Hani M. Tamim ◽  
Aurelie C. Mailhac ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S817-S818
Author(s):  
H. Timmerhuis ◽  
N. Hallensleben ◽  
R. Hollemans ◽  
S. Pocornie ◽  
J. van Grinsven ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document