scholarly journals A novel technique to rebuild the Valsava sinus in acute type A aortic dissection

Author(s):  
Long Zhao ◽  
Ruofeng Hong ◽  
Jianbin Fei ◽  
Junpeng Li ◽  
Jianneng Pan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. There has been many techniques described to preserve the integrity of the aortic root with good outcomes for those with acute type A aortic dissection. However, whether to use these technique in emergency patients presenting with AADA remains controversial.Methods. Between December 2019 and Feburary 2021, 11 patients underwent aortic root partial repair using a button technique.Results. The postoperative echocardiography 1 month after operation showed mild regurgitation in 7 cases and moderate regurgitation in 2 cases. Two patients died because of low cardiac outflow. Temporary neurological dysfunction was observed in one patient and hoarseness occurred in one patient.Conclusions. Our partial aortic root remodeling operation is very easy to operate and has a good short-term effect. It might be a useful strategy for acute type A aortic dissection in patients with one or two Valsalva sinuses affected.

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-329
Author(s):  
Junji Yunoki ◽  
Yoshihiro Nakayama ◽  
Hiroyuki Oonishi ◽  
Hiroyuki Morokuma ◽  
Hideya Tanaka

Author(s):  
Marie‐Catherine Morgant ◽  
Ghislain Malapert ◽  
Chloé Bernard ◽  
Aline Laubriet ◽  
Charline Pujos ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1360-1370.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Yang ◽  
Aroosa Malik ◽  
Victoria Waidley ◽  
Kellianne C. Kleeman ◽  
Xiaoting Wu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 021849232110150
Author(s):  
Tillana Nirav Tarkas ◽  
Carla Stoicescu ◽  
Wahaj Munir ◽  
Mohamad Bashir ◽  
Benjamin Adams

Acute type A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency with a high mortality rate if left untreated. Management of the aortic root in this setting constitutes an intricate decision-making framework, further complicated by the emergent nature of the dissection. There exists much controversy regarding pursuit of the aggressive aortic root replacement versus a conservative root-sparing repair, alongside considerations for valve-sparing root replacement. In this review, we critically appraise the current controversy in the literature considering the fate of the aortic root, discussing the aforementioned root interventions for which provides better outcomes for mortality and risk of re-intervention. Literature search was performed using electronic database through PubMed, Google scholar, and Embase focussing on studies reporting outcomes and re-intervention rates for these approaches. Limited by the heterogeneity in surgical strategy, with most studies being single-centred retrospective experiences, further fuel this ongoing debate. The literature reveals rather contrasting results whilst comparing root-sparing repair, versus the extensive root replacement; whilst some studies report no statistically significant difference, others show one superior over the other. There is greater consensus when considering risk of re-operation, with studies showing higher rates of re-operation in root-sparing group compared to replacement; however, many others show no statistically significant difference. In conclusion, the conflicting outcomes reported in the literature, with their inherent limitations, results in the current inability to reach a definitive answer. There remains support in the current literature for both approaches with much of the decision-making being surgeon-bound with many significant influencing factors on a case-by-case basis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hug Aubin ◽  
Payam Akhyari ◽  
Philipp Rellecke ◽  
Christina Pawlitza ◽  
George Petrov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document