Two-year outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy combined with small-incision lenticule extraction for high astigmatism

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽

Induced Astigmatism ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

Abstract Background: To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism.Methods: This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method.Results: Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from -6.56 ± 2.38 D to -0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to -0.02 ± 0.09 and from -0.03 ± 0.07 D to -0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was -5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to -2.27 ± 0.97 D and -0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p <0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusion: Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.

Two-year outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy combined with small-incision lenticule extraction for high astigmatism

10.21203/rs.3.rs-44166/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bu Ki Kim ◽

Young Taek Chung

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Full Thickness ◽

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽

Induced Astigmatism ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

Two-year outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy combined with small-incision lenticule extraction for high astigmatism

BMC Ophthalmology ◽

10.1186/s12886-020-01756-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Bu Ki Kim ◽

Young Taek Chung

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Full Thickness ◽

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽

Induced Astigmatism ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

Abstract Background To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism. Methods This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method. Results Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from − 6.56 ± 2.38 D to − 0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to − 0.02 ± 0.09 and from − 0.03 ± 0.07 D to − 0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was − 5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to − 2.27 ± 0.97 D and − 0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p < 0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusion Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.

Two-year outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy combined with small-incision lenticule extraction for high astigmatism

10.21203/rs.3.rs-44166/v4 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bu Ki Kim ◽

Young Taek Chung

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Full Thickness ◽

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽

Induced Astigmatism ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

Abstract Background: To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism.Methods: This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method.Results: Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from -6.56 ± 2.38 D to -0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to -0.02 ± 0.09 and from -0.03 ± 0.07 D to -0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was -5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to -2.27 ± 0.97 D and -0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p <0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.Conclusion: Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.

Two-Year Outcomes After Full-Thickness Astigmatic Keratotomy Combined with Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Astigmatism

10.21203/rs.3.rs-44166/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bu Ki Kim ◽

Young Taek Chung

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Full Thickness ◽

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽

Induced Astigmatism ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism.Methods: This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method.Results: Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from -6.56 ± 2.38 D to -0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to -0.02 ± 0.09 and from -0.03 ± 0.07 D to -0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was -5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to -2.27 ± 0.97 D and -0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p <0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusion: Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.

Vector analysis of small incision lenticule extraction and toric implantable collamer lens implantation for astigmatism correction

European Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1177/1120672120930607 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 112067212093060

Author(s):

Ting Wan ◽

Houfa Yin ◽

Zhiyi Wu ◽

Yabo Yang

Keyword(s):

Vector Analysis ◽

Implantable Collamer Lens ◽

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatism Correction ◽

Induced Astigmatism ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

The Difference ◽

Surgically Induced ◽

Myopic Astigmatism

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) implantation for myopic astigmatism correction using vector analysis. Methods: In this retrospective study, 171 eyes of 171 patients with cylinder ⩾1.0 diopters (D) were recruited, with 97 eyes underwent SMILE and 74 eyes underwent TICL implantation. Preoperative and 3-months postoperative visual and refractive results were examined. The astigmatism correction, graded by the degree of preoperative cylinder was compared between two groups using vector analysis. Results: At 3-months postoperatively, the residual cylinder was −0.10 ± 0.21 D in the SMILE group and −0.30 ± 0.32 D in the TCL group ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, 98% and 85% of eyes had the cylinder within ±0.5 D in the SMILE and TICL group, respectively. The vector analysis revealed similar target induced astigmatism vector in two groups. However, the difference vector, magnitude of error, angle of error, and index of success were significantly higher (0.30 ± 0.32 D, −0.19 ± 0.25, −2° ± 4.35°, and 0.16 ± 0.17 D, respectively) in the TICL group than the values in the SMILE group (0.10 ± 0.21 D, −0.05 ± 0.20, −0.03° ± 2.13°, and 0.05 ± 0.12, respectively), regardless of the degree of preoperative cylinder (all p < 0.05). For preoperative cylinder < 2.0 D, surgically induced astigmatism vector and correction index in the SMILE group were higher than those in the TICL group ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both SMILE and TICL implantation are effective techniques for myopic astigmatism correction. However, the accuracy of correction in the magnitude and axis of astigmatism with SMILE was better than that achieved with TICL implantation.

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction in High Myopia: 5-Year Results

Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1155/2018/5893126 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Alper Ağca ◽

İhsan Çakır ◽

Beril Tülü Aygün ◽

Dilek Yaşa ◽

Yusuf Yıldırım ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Visual Acuity ◽

High Myopia ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Distance Visual Acuity ◽

Small Incision ◽

Refractive Outcomes ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

The Mean

Purpose. To report long-term visual and refractive results of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in treatment of high myopia. Materials and Methods. Medical records of patients who underwent SMILE for surgical correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with a preoperative spherical equivalent of subjective manifest refraction (SE) ≥ 6 D and a postoperative follow-up of 5 years were included in the study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and SE were analyzed preoperatively and at 1-, 3-, and 5-year postoperative periods. Results. Thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients were included in the study. The mean attempted SE was −7.47 ± 1.10 D (range −6.00 to −10.00 D). At the 5-year visit, the mean difference between achieved and attempted SE was −0.43 ± 0.47 (0.50 to −1.25 D). Mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 0.20 ± 0.18 and 0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR, respectively. At the 1-year visit, 70% and 97% of the eyes were within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D of the intended correction. At the 5-year follow-up, 59% and 92% percent of the eyes were within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D of the intended SE, respectively. At the 5-year visit, the efficacy index was 0.89 ± 0.26 and the safety index was 1.16 ± 0.20. Fifty-four percent of the eyes gained one or more lines of CDVA. Conclusion. SMILE with an intended correction of up to a spherical equivalent of 10 D is safe and effective. However, there is regression of the refractive effect over extended follow-up.

Full-Thickness Astigmatic Keratotomy Combined With Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction to Treat High-Level and Mixed Astigmatism

Cornea ◽

10.1097/ico.0000000000000613 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 34 (12) ◽

pp. 1582-1587 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Bu Ki Kim ◽

Su Joung Mun ◽

Dae Gyu Lee ◽

Jae Ryun Kim ◽

Hyun Seung Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Full Thickness ◽

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

High Level

One year outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

BMC Ophthalmology ◽

10.1186/s12886-021-02195-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Cristina Ariadna Nicula ◽

Dorin Nicula ◽

Sorana D. Bolboacă ◽

Adriana Elena Bulboacă

Keyword(s):

Visual Acuity ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Distance Visual Acuity ◽

Small Incision ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

The Mean ◽

One Year ◽

Myopic Astigmatism

Abstract Purpose To report the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX (SMILE) technique using VisuMax femtosecond laser in myopia and myopic astigmatism patients. Material and methods A non-randomized clinical study has been conducted on patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent ReLEX SMILE technique, using the Zeiss VisuMax Laser system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) at Oculens Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Patients older than 18 years, with ocular astigmatism up to -5 diopters (D), spherical equivalent up to -10.00 D, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.3 or better before the surgery, stable refraction for one year, and with a minimum calculated post operator residual stromal bed of 250μ were included in the study. Results The study involved a total of 25 myopic eyes (median of sphere diopters equal with -4D) and 67 myopic astigmatic eyes (median of cylinder diopters equal with -1.5 D). The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) on patients with myopic eyes reduced from -4.25D (median) to -0.5D at one month follow-up, -0.25 D at 6 and 12 months. The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) on patients with astigmatic myopic eyes reduced from-6.25 D to -0.67 D at one month, -0.62 D at six and twelve months. The value of sphere decreased postoperatively on myopic eyes with a median of -0.25D at one, six and twelve months. The value of cylinder decreased postoperatively on myopic astigmatic eyes with a median of -0.50 D at one month, -0.25 D at six months and -0.50 D at 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, 20 (80.0%) of myopic eyes were maintained within ±0.5 D and 22 (88.0%) with ±1D. On both groups (myopic eyes and myopic astigmatic eyes), statistically significant differences were observed when the keratometric baseline values were compared to each follow-up (P-values < 0.0001), without any significant differences between follow-ups (P-values>0.15). At 1-month follow-up, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was better than or equal to 0.5 in 88.0% of myopic eyes and 82.1% of myopic astigmatic eyes. UDVA remained stable in all cases of myopic eyes at six months and the percentage increased at 92.0% in myopic eyes. UDVA slightly increased at 6-months (85.1%) and remained at the same value at 12-months in myopic astigmatism eyes. Conclusions SMILE proved an effective and safe refractive corneal procedure and provided a predictable and stable correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE technique demonstrated very good outcomes in terms of keratometric, cylinder, spherical measurements.