refractive outcomes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

422
(FIVE YEARS 198)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Mo Han ◽  
Dong Min Cha ◽  
Hee Chan Ku ◽  
Dong Kwon Lim ◽  
Eun Koo Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes between a 4-point scleral fixation of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using Gore-Tex suture or a 2-point scleral fixation using Prolene sutureMethods: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, patients were enrolled who had undergone a pars plana vitrectomy and either a 4-point scleral fixation using Gore-Tex suture or a 2-point scleral fixation using Prolene suture. Preoperative biometrics, postoperative refractive outcomes, and postoperative surgical complication rates were evaluated.Results: Thirty-seven eyes underwent scleral fixation with Gore-Tex suture, while 44 eyes underwent scleral fixation with Prolene suture. Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was 0.20 (± 0.34) in the Gore-Tex group and 0.21 (± 0.28) in the Prolene group (logMAR, 20/32 on the Snellen scale) (p = 0.691). No significant difference was found in the average prediction error between the Gore-Tex (-0.13 ± 0.68 D) and Prolene (-0.21 ± 1.27 D) groups (p = 0.077). The postoperative complication rate was lower in the Gore-Tex group (17%) than in the Prolene group (41%) (p = 0.023).Conclusion: A 4-point scleral fixation using Gore-Tex suture may be a good alternative to a conventional scleral fixation using Prolene suture for IOL implantations in eyes without capsular support, with a lower risk of postoperative complications.


2022 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Nazanin Ebrahimiadib ◽  
Ramak Roohipourmoallai ◽  
Shahin Faghihi ◽  
Hooshang Faghihi ◽  
Ali Torkashvand ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
Arturo Ramirez-Miranda ◽  
Simran Mangwani-Mordani ◽  
Erick Hernandez-Bogantes ◽  
Alexandra Abdala-Figuerola ◽  
Andrew Olivo-Payne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada ◽  
José-María Sánchez-González ◽  
Davide Borroni ◽  
Concepción De-Hita-Cantalejo ◽  
Federico Alonso-Aliste

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Francisco Poyales ◽  
Ricardo Pérez ◽  
Israel López-Brea ◽  
Ying Zhou ◽  
Nuria Garzón

Purpose. To compare postcataract surgery visual and optical performance between two trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with the same optical design: a hydrophobic acrylic glistening-free IOL and a hydrophilic acrylic IOL. Methods. Patients were bilaterally implanted with either the hydrophobic or the hydrophilic IOL. The data of the patients’ right eyes were evaluated. Visual quality assessments included refractive outcomes, monocular visual acuity (VA) at far, intermediate, and near distances, defocus curve, aberrations (spherical aberration (SA)), root mean square (RMS) of corneal, internal, and total higher-order aberrations (HOAs)), and tilt of IOL. Results. Fifty-one patients were included in the analysis: 26 patients implanted with the hydrophobic IOL and 25 patients implanted with the hydrophilic IOL. At 1 month, no statistically significant differences were found for monocular uncorrected and corrected VA at distance, distance-corrected VA at intermediate and near, defocus curve, manifest spherical equivalent, total SA, and RMS of the total, internal, and corneal HOA. The defocus curve of both groups showed a visual acuity of 0.3 logMAR or better in the intermediate range from 0.5 to −2.5 D of vergence level with no significant differences between the groups. Compared to the hydrophilic group, y-direction tilt was significantly higher in the hydrophobic group ( p = 0.027 ). The total tilt and x-axis tilt did not differ between the groups. Conclusion. Both IOLs demonstrated an excellent quality of vision and provided the patient with a wide range of vision.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Khan ◽  
Kathryn Haider

Background:  Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a disease where the blood vessels in the eye fail to develop appropriately in infants born prematurely. Two effective treatments for ROP include laser photocoagulation therapy and intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). Laser therapy has been linked to causing high myopia in children post-treatment. We hypothesize that patients treated with IVB alone or in combination with laser will have less myopia development than patients treated with laser therapy alone.  Methods:  Patient demographics, treatment details, refractive data at 6-9 months and 3-4 years, the occurrence of strabismus at 3 years, and the most recent vision data were collected from 133 ROP patients. Patients not treated at IU health and those lost to follow-up, or deceased before both eye exams, were excluded from the study. Quantitative analysis was used to compare the refractive error, strabismus, and vision outcomes between the three treatment groups. A linear regression model was used to analyze the relationship between the number of laser spots applied and refractive error.  Results:  Refractive outcomes at 6-9 months and 3-4 years, occurrence of strabismus, and vision outcomes were statistically similar between the three treatment groups. However, the laser group had the most occurrences of high myopia. We also observed a 0.002 unit decrease in refractive error, reported at 6–9-months, with each laser spot applied (p<0.001). This may be due to the influence of outliers because no significant relationship was seen at the 3–4 year exam.  Conclusion and Potential Impact:  There was no difference in outcomes among patients treated with IVB, laser, or a combination of both, with the exception of more myopic outliers in the laser-only group. We can therefore assume that ROP patients who have received one of these three treatments had developed differences in myopia independent of treatment modality. 


Author(s):  
Rajvi Mehta ◽  
Shizuka Tomatzu ◽  
Dingcai Cao ◽  
Alexander Pleet ◽  
Alexander Mokhur ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-222
Author(s):  
Aasiah Ahmad Sharifuddin ◽  
Fiona Lee Min Chew ◽  
Irina Effendi-Tenang ◽  
Amir Samsudin

Objective: To compare the refractive outcomes of laser-treated and non-laser-treated retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) infant, at 2 years of age in Hospital Selayang.Methods: Retrospective review involving patients born between 2016 and 2018. They were divided into those who were treated with laser photocoagulation, and those who were observed. Laser treatment was given to infants with threshold and high-risk, pre-threshold disease. Refractive error was identified by cycloplegic refraction at 2 years of age.Results: There were 22 eyes from 11 infants in the laser-treated group, all of which had zone II ROP with plus disease; of these, four had stage 2 ROP and 18 had stage 3 ROP. There were 53 eyes from 28 patients in the non-laser-treated group. The mean birth weight for the laser-treated and non-laser-treated groups was 966.9 ± 92.6 g and 1019.3 ± 282.0 g, respectively (P = 0.398). Mean gestational age for the laser-treated and non-laser-treated groups was 28.2 ± 2.2 weeks and 27.7 ± 2.2 weeks, respectively (P = 0.390). At 2 years, the mean spherical equivalence for the laser-treated and non-laser treated groups was -0.55 ± 2.49 D and +0.17 ± 1.43 D, respectively, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.120). Myopia was commoner in the laser-treated group (six eyes [27%] vs five eyes [9%], P = 0.047), and two eyes from two different infants (10%) from this group also developed high myopia (> -6.00 D). For hypermetropia and astigmatism, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (all P > 0.05). High myopia was strongly related to the post-conceptual age when receiving laser therapy (P = 0.025). In the laser-treated group, two infants (9%) had amblyopia and one (5%) had exotropia at 2 years of age. None of the eyes developed structural retinal sequelae.Conclusion: Despite successful treatment of ROP, a significant number of laser-treated eyes developed myopia. This highlights the need for long-term refractive screening in these patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Müjdat Karabulut ◽  
Sinem Karabulut ◽  
Aylin Karalezli

Abstract Background To compare the refractive results of hand-held and table-mounted autorefractors. Methods We designed this study as an observational, cross-sectional study. We compared the mean spheric and cylinder power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder values, determined the limits of agreement (LoA), and evaluated the reliability of two autorefractors. Results We evaluated 256 eyes of 256 pediatric patients (mean age, 9.12 ± 2.26 years; range, 5–16 years). 49% of the patients were female, and 51% were male. The Nidek HandyRef-K autorefractor measured relatively more astigmatism (P < 0.001) and less hyperopia (P = 0.024). The mean differences and 95% LoA were 0.06 D ± 0.47 D (− 0.82 D to 0.98 D) in spherical power, 0.08 D ± 0.28 D (− 0.47 D to 0.64 D) in cylindrical power, 0.11 D ± 0.47 D (− 0.81 D to 1.01 D) in spherical equivalent, 0.02 D ± 0.36 D (− 0.73 D to 0.69 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 0.005 D ± 0.54 D (− 1.07 D to 1.06 D) in Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°. We found the difference within 0.50 D in 244 (95%) eyes for spherical power, in 245 (96%) eyes for cylindrical power, 228 (89%) eyes for spherical equivalent, 224 (87%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°, 213 (83%) eyes for Jackson cross-cylinder power at 45°. When comparing devices, there were strong correlations for spherical power (Spearman’s rho = 0.99, P < 0.001), cylindrical power (Spearman’s rho = 0.88, P < 0.001), and spherical equivalent (Spearman’s rho = 0.98, P < 0.001). Conclusion Two autorefractors showed clinically applicable agreement limits; excellent reliability for spherical power and spherical equivalent and good reliability for cylindrical power; high positive percent agreement for spherical and cylindrical power, spherical equivalent, Jackson cross-cylinder power at 0°and 45°. These results showed that both devices might be used interchangeably for screening of refractive error in children.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 824-829
Author(s):  
Hani F. Sakla ◽  
Wasim Altroudi ◽  
Yousef F.R. Sakla ◽  
Gonzalo Muñoz ◽  
Catia Pineza

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document