scholarly journals Evaluation of Optimal Sites for the Insertion of Orthodontic Mini-implants at Mandibular Symphysis Region Through Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Author(s):  
Shizhen Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyu Wei ◽  
Lufei Wang ◽  
Zhouqiang Wu ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: This study evaluates the overall bone thickness (OBT) and cortical bone thickness (CBT) of mandibular symphysis and to determine the optimal sites for the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants.Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 32 patients (18 males, 14 females), including 16 adults and 16 adolescents were included in this study. The sample was further categorized into three facial types: low angle, average angle, and high angle. OBT and CBT were measured at the mandibular symphysis region. All measurements were performed at six different heights (2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm from cementoenamel junction [CEJ]) and at seven different angles (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 degrees to the occlusal plane). Results: Neither OBT nor CBT was influenced by age or sex, except for that CBT was significantly thicker in adults than in adolescents. OBT and CBT were significantly thicker in low-angle cases than in average- and high-angle cases. Both OBT and CBT were significantly influenced by insertion locations, insertion heights, insertion angles, and their interactions. CBT and OBT gained the greatest value at the location between two lower central incisors, and became greater with the increase of insertion height and insertion angle. Both recommended and optimal insertion sites were mapped. Conclusions: Mandibular symphysis region was suitable for the placement of orthodontic mini-implants. The optimal insertion site was 6-10 mm apical to CEJ between two lower central incisors with an insertion angle being 0-60 degrees to the occlusal plane.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. López-Jarana ◽  
C. M. Díaz-Castro ◽  
A. Falcão ◽  
C. Falcão ◽  
J. V. Ríos-Santos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to measure two parameters involved in tri-dimensional implant planning: the position of the buccal and palatal bone wall and the palatal thickness. Methods Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images (Planmeca ProMax 3D) of 403 teeth (208 upper teeth and 195 lower teeth) were obtained from 49 patients referred to the Dental School of Seville from January to December 2014. The height difference between the palatal and buccal walls was measured on the most coronal point of both walls. The thickness of the palatal wall was measured 2 mm from the most coronal point of the palatal wall. Results The mean values in the maxilla were 1.7 ± 0.9 mm for central and lateral incisors, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for canines, 1.6 ± 0.9 mm for premolars and 1.9 ± 1.5 mm for molars. In the lower jaw, the mean values were 1.3 ± 0.8 mm for incisors, 1.7 ± 1.2 mm for canines, 2.3 ± 1.3 mm for premolars, and 2.6 ± 1.7 mm for molars. In the upper jaw, more than 55% of maxillary teeth (excluding second premolars and molars) presented mean height differences greater than 1 mm. In the mandible, more than 60% of incisors showed a buccal bone thickness of 1 mm from the apical to lingual aspect. All teeth except the second premolar presented a buccal wall located more than 1 mm more apically than the lingual bone wall. Conclusions The buccal bone wall is located more apically (greater than 1 mm) than the palatal or lingual table in most of the cases assessed. The thickness of the palatal or lingual table is also less than 2 mm in the maxilla and mandible, except in the upper canines and premolars and the lower molars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document