scholarly journals A Finite Element Analysis and Cyclic Load Experiment on an Additional Transcortical-Type Hole Formed Around The Proximal Femoral Nail System’s Distal Locking Screw

Author(s):  
Hong Man Cho ◽  
Seung Min Choi ◽  
JiYeon Park ◽  
Young Lee ◽  
Jung Hyung Bae

Abstract Background A complication associated with the distal locking screw used in the proximal femoral nail (PFN) system is the formation of accidental additional holes. We hypothesized that an increase in stress around additional holes is a relevant factor contributing to fractures. This study aimed to evaluate stress changes in the cortical bone around additional screw holes using finite element analysis. Methods Proximal femoral nail PFN antirotation (PFNA)-II (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland) was inserted into a femur model. An additional 4.9-mm transcortical hole was made either anteriorly (anterior hole model) or posteriorly (posterior hole model) to the distal locking screw. Finite element analysis was used to calculate compression, tension, and load limits to investigate stress around additional holes with respect to the direction of screw penetration and degree of osteoporosis. The results were then compared with those of mechanical testing. A 31A-21 type intertrochanteric fracture was applied. As a control group, a model without additional holes (no-hole model) was developed. Repeated load-loading tests were performed on 10 model bones per model group. Results Tensile stress was significantly greater in the no-hole model when additional screw holes were present, and the anterior hole showed a higher maximum stress value than the posterior hole did, suggesting that the anterior hole was more susceptible to fracture. The change in tensile stress first appeared in the hole around the lateral cortical bone and proceeded to the medial side. Biomechanical testing showed that fractures around the distal locking screw occurred in 0 cases of the no-hole, 10 of anterior hole, and 9 of the posterior hole models. Conclusions During PFN surgery for intertrochanteric fracture, holes with distal locking screws fixed and removed at the anterior and posterior of the nail can be a risk factor for fractures in the surrounding area.

Author(s):  
Jian Chen ◽  
Jian-xiong Ma ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Hao-hao Bai ◽  
Lei Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background More elderly patients are suffering from intertrochanteric fractures. However, the choice of internal fixation is still controversial, especially in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture; thus, previous implants continue to be improved, and new ones are being developed. The purpose of our study was to compare the biomechanical advantages between the zimmer natural nail (ZNN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation-II (PFNA-II) in the treatment of elderly reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures. Methods A three-dimensional finite element was applied for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fracture models (AO31-A3.1) fixed with the ZNN or PFNA-II. The distribution, peak value and position of the von Mises stress and the displacement were the criteria for comparison between the two groups. Results The stresses of the internal fixation and femur in the ZNN model were smaller than those in the PFNA-II model, and the peak values of the two groups were 364.8 MPa and 171.8 MPa (ZNN) and 832.3 MPa and 1795.0 MPa (PFNA-II). The maximum amount of displacement of the two groups was similar, and their locations were the same, i.e., in the femoral head vertex (3.768 mm in the ZNN model and 3.713 mm in the PFNA-II model). Conclusions The displacement in the two models was similar, but the stresses in the implant and bone were reduced with the ZNN. Therefore, the ZNN implant may provide biomechanical advantages over PFNA-II in reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures, as shown through the finite element analysis. These findings from our study may provide a reference for the perioperative selection of internal fixations.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S455 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Helwig ◽  
G. Faust ◽  
U. Hindenlang ◽  
B. Kröplin ◽  
N. Südkamp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document