scholarly journals Association Between Intraoperative Computed Tomography Navigation System and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Spinal Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
GENTARO KUMAGAI ◽  
Kanichiro Wada ◽  
Sunao Tanaka ◽  
Toru Asari ◽  
Yohshiro Nitobe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Navigation System ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Intraoperative Imaging ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Purpose: Although the use of intraoperative computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems is unlikely to cause intraoperative contamination more than the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the association between intraoperative CT/navigation and surgical site infections (SSIs) remains unclear. We investigated the incidence of SSIs and the association between intraoperative CT/navigation and SSIs for spinal surgeries.Methods: Of the 512 patients who underwent spinal surgery between April 2016 and December 2020, 304 underwent C-arm intraoperative fluoroscopy and/or Medtronic O-arm intraoperative CT/navigation system. We investigated the incidence of SSIs in patients with four techniques; no intraoperative imaging C-arm only, O-arm only, and both O- and C-arm used. Multivariate logistic analyses were conducted using the prevalence of SSIs as the dependent variable. The independent variables were age, sex, and potential confounders including preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, use of instrumentation, C-arm and/or O-arm. Results: The incidence of the SSIs in patients with no imaging, C-arm only, O-arm only, and both modalities used was 1.9％, 7.3%, 4.7%, and 8.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSIs between the four techniques. Multivariate logistic analyses showed a significant correlation between the prevalence of SSI and JOA scores (odds ratio, 0.878; 95%CI, 0.759-0.990) and use of instrumentation (odds ratio, 6.241; 95%CI, 1.113-34.985), but not use of O-arm.Conclusions: The incidence of the SSIs in patients with only O-arm used was 4.7%. Preoperative clinical status and use of instrumentation, but not use of the O-arm, was associated with SSIs after spinal surgeries.

Combined Image Guidance and Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Facilitating Endoscopic Orientation within and around the Paranasal Sinuses

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah K. Wise ◽  
Richard J. Harvey ◽  
John C. Goddard ◽  
Patrick O. Sheahan ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Paranasal Sinus ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Preoperative Ct ◽  
Anatomic Region

Background The utility of image guidance (image-guided surgery [IGS]) and intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning as a tool for less experienced endoscopic surgeons to aid in localization of paranasal sinus and skull base anatomic structures was evaluated. Methods Partial endoscopic dissection was performed on cadaver specimens by three fellowship trained rhinologists. Anatomic sites within and around the sinuses were tagged with radio-opaque markers. Otolaryngology residents identified tagged anatomic sites using four successive levels of technology: endoscopy alone (simulating outpatient clinic), endoscopy plus preoperative CT (simulating endoscopic sinus surgery [ESS] without IGS), endoscopy plus IGS registered to preoperative CT (simulating current ESS with IGS), and endoscopy plus IGS registered to real-time intraoperative CT. Responses were graded as follows: consensus rhinologist answer (4 points), close answer without clinically significant difference (3 points), within anatomic region but definite clinical difference (2 points), outside of anatomic region (1 point), no answer (0 points). Results Eleven residents participated. Of 20 specific anatomic sites, IGS-intraoperative CT provided the most accurate anatomic identification at 16 sites. For 8 sites, IGS-intraoperative CT had a significantly higher score than endoscopy alone (p < 0.05; eta2 = 0.29-0.67). For 6 sites, IGS-preoperative CT scan had a significantly higher score than endoscopy alone (p < 0.05; eta2 = 0.30-0.67). All participants found that IGS-intraoperative CT scan made them most comfortable in identifying anatomy. Conclusion Combined IGS and intraoperative CT scan technology may be an instructional adjunct for less experienced paranasal sinus surgeons for dissection and evaluation of unfamiliar or distorted anatomy.

Evaluation of Tarsal Navicular Stress Fracture Fixation Using Intraoperative O-arm Computed Tomography

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Hsu ◽  
Simon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Stress Fracture ◽  
Guide Wire ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Fracture Site ◽  
Stress Fractures ◽  
Functional Impairments ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Anatomic Reduction

Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular are high-risk injuries that can result in displacement, avascular necrosis, malunion, and nonunion. Delayed diagnosis and improper treatment can lead to long-term functional impairments and poor clinical outcomes. Increased shear stress and decreased vascularity in the central third of the navicular can complicate bony healing with often unpredictable return times to activity using conservative management in a non-weight-bearing cast. There recently has been increasing debate regarding the effectiveness of treatment options with a trend toward surgical management to anatomically reduce and stabilize navicular stress fractures in athletes. However, anatomic reduction and fixation of the navicular can be difficult despite direct visualization and intraoperative fluoroscopy. We report a case of a chronic navicular stress fracture in a high-level teenage athlete treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and calcaneus autograft using intraoperative computed tomography (CT) (O-arm®, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) for real-time evaluation of fracture reduction and fixation. Intraoperative CT was fast, reliable, and allowed for confirmation of guide wire orientation, alignment, and length across the fracture site. Anatomic fixation of navicular stress fractures can be challenging, and it is important for surgeons to be aware of the potential advantages of using intraoperative CT when treating these injuries. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV: Case Report

scholarly journals Comparison of Laminoplasty and Posterior Fusion Surgery for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nakashima ◽  
Shiro Imagama ◽  
Toshitaka Yoshii ◽  
Satoru Egawa ◽  
Kenichiro Sakai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Posterior Fusion ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Intensity Change ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract This prospective multicenter study formed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare at 27 institutions aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Controversy exists regarding the role of instrumented fusion in the context of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. Among the 479 patients enrolled, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, and increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments showed no significant differences. The overall risk of perioperative complications was lower in LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and C5 palsy was significantly lower in LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than in PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients with PF was significantly smaller than in those with LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at two years after surgery.

Application of Intraoperative Computed Tomography With or Without Navigation System in Surgical Correction of Spinal Deformity

Spine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 891-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geng Cui ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Ting-Hsien Kao ◽  
Yonggang Zhang ◽  
Zhengsheng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Navigation System ◽  
Surgical Correction ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance and Intraoperative Computed Tomography Fusion for Real-Time Neuronavigation in Intramedullary Lesion Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Costa ◽  
Alessandro Ortolina ◽  
Andrea Cardia ◽  
Marco Riva ◽  
Martina Revay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Intraoperative Ct ◽  
Intraoperative Computed Tomography ◽  
Intramedullary Lesion ◽  
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Dural Opening

Abstract BACKGROUND: Image-guided surgery techniques in spinal surgery are usually based upon fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT) scan, which allow for a real-time navigation of bony structures, though not of neural structures and soft tissue remains. OBJECTIVE: To verify the effectiveness and efficacy of a novel technique of imaging merging between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative CT scan during removal of intramedullary lesions. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients were treated for intramedullary lesions using a navigation system aid. Preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI was merged in the navigation software, with an intraoperative CT acquisition, performed using the O-armTM system (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Dosimetric and timing data were also acquired for each patient. RESULTS: The fusion process was achieved in all cases and was uneventful. The merged imaging information was useful in all cases for defining the exact area of laminectomy, dural opening, and the eventual extension of cordotomy, without requiring exposition corrections. The radiation dose for the patients was 0.78 mSv. Using the authors’ protocol, it was possible to merge a preoperative MRI with navigation based on intraoperative CT scanning in all cases. Information gained with this technique was useful during the different surgical steps. However, there were some drawbacks, such as the merging process, which still remains partially manual. CONCLUSION: In this initial experience, MRI and CT merging and its feasibility were tested, and we appreciated its safety, precision, and ease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document