scholarly journals Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Animal Models of Acute Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Laflamme ◽  
Hourmazd Haghbayan ◽  
Manoj M Lalu ◽  
Ryan Zarychanski ◽  
Francois Lauzier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Anemia is common in neurocritically ill patients. Considering the limited clinical evidence in this population, preclinical data may provide some understanding of the potential impact of anemia and of red blood cell transfusion in these patients. We aim to estimate the association between different transfusion strategies and neurobehavioral outcome in animal models.Methods: We will conduct a systematic review of comparative studies of red blood cell transfusion strategies using animal models of traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke or cerebral hemorrhage. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases for eligible studies. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection and data extraction. We will report our results in a descriptive synthesis focusing on characteristics of included studies, reported outcomes, risk of bias and construct validity. If appropriate, we will also perform a quantitative synthesis and pool results using random-effect models. Heterogeneity will be expressed with I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses are planned according to animal model characteristics, co-interventions and risks of bias.Discussion: Our study is aligned with the efforts to better understand the level of evidence on the impact of red blood cell transfusion strategies from preclinical studies in animal models of acute brain injury and the potential translation of information from the preclinical to the clinical research field.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018086662

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Laflamme ◽  
Hourmazd Haghbayan ◽  
Manoj M. Lalu ◽  
Ryan Zarychanski ◽  
François Lauzier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anemia is common in neurocritically ill patients. Considering the limited clinical evidence in this population, preclinical data may provide some understanding of the potential impact of anemia and of red blood cell transfusion in these patients. We aim to estimate the association between different transfusion strategies and neurobehavioral outcome in animal models. Methods We will conduct a systematic review of comparative studies of red blood cell transfusion strategies using animal models of traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke or cerebral hemorrhage. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies from inception onwards. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection and data extraction. We will report our results in a descriptive synthesis focusing on characteristics of included studies, reported outcomes, risk of bias, and construct validity. Our primary outcome is the neurological function (neurobehavioral performance) and our secondary outcomes include mortality, infarct size, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, cerebral blood flow, and brain tissue oxygen tension. If appropriate, we will also perform a quantitative synthesis and pool results using random-effect models. Heterogeneity will be expressed with I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses are planned according to animal model characteristics, co-interventions, and risks of bias. Discussion Our study is aligned with the efforts to better understand the level of evidence on the impact of red blood cell transfusion strategies from preclinical studies in animal models of acute brain injury and the potential translation of information from the preclinical to the clinical research field. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018086662.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Boutin ◽  
Michaël Chassé ◽  
Michèle Shemilt ◽  
François Lauzier ◽  
Lynne Moore ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren S. Prescott ◽  
Jolyn S. Taylor ◽  
Maria A. Lopez-Olivo ◽  
Mark F. Munsell ◽  
Helena M. VonVille ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria A. McCredie ◽  
Simone Piva ◽  
Marlene Santos ◽  
Wei Xiong ◽  
Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Boutin ◽  
Michaël Chassé ◽  
Michèle Shemilt ◽  
François Lauzier ◽  
Lynne Moore ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Anwar ◽  
A Bakhsh ◽  
S Manieanan ◽  
M khan

Abstract Background Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant and growing worldwide healthcare burden. Minimising brain hypoxia is important in preventing secondary brain injury. Anaemia is common in TBI patients but there is little evidence as to which haemoglobin (Hb) threshold transfusion should be considered in TBI patients. Objective This present systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials aims to assess the effect of high verses low red blood cell transfusion thresholds on functional outcomes and quality of life in TBI patients. Method We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to June 2020. We also searched clinical trial registers, conference proceedings, and reference lists from previous systematic reviews and included studies. We included randomised studies comparing high verses low Hb threshold for red blood cell transfusion in TBI patients. We assessed the following major outcomes: all-cause mortality, transfusion related adverse events and favourable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale, GOS). Results We included 3 RCTs involving 311 participants. Our analysis showed no difference in all-cause mortality (3-6 months) (OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.64 to 2.13)) and no difference in GOS (OR 1.10 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.85)) between transfusing red blood cells at 7g/dL or at 9/10g/dL in moderate to severe TBI. Conclusions There is no difference between a high and a low Hb threshold transfusion policy. However, considering the limitations in current evidence there is a need for future high quality randomised controlled trials.


Critical Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P332
Author(s):  
A Boutin ◽  
M Chasse ◽  
M Shemilt ◽  
F Lauzier ◽  
L Moore ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document