Operation Upshot-Knothole. Project 5.1. Atomic Weapon Effects on AD Type Aircraft in Flight

1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Rogin ◽  
Alden C. DuPont ◽  
Christian G. Weeber
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Siracusa

America’s monopoly on atomic weapons was shorter than expected. ‘Race for the H-bomb’ details the development of the hydrogen bomb and the political developments surrounding it. The Soviet Union developed an atomic weapon faster than worst-case scenarios had predicted. Stalin appeared at first to dismiss the bomb, but it is likely that his understanding was more nuanced. What else could America have done with their short window of opportunity? Some argued for preventive war, but this went against the national character. The development of the hydrogen bomb took war out of the realms of logic and human control altogether, and anti-nuclear movements began to gather force in the 1950s.


2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (15) ◽  
pp. 7588-7593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy J. Bellucci ◽  
Antonio Simonetti ◽  
Christine Wallace ◽  
Elizabeth C. Koeman ◽  
Peter C. Burns

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
RALPH DESMARAIS

AbstractJacob (‘Bruno’) Bronowski (1908–1974), on the basis of having examined the effects of the atomic bombing of Japan in late 1945, became one of Britain's most vocal and best-known scientific intellectuals engaged in the cultural politics of the early atomic era. Witnessing Hiroshima helped transform him from pure mathematician–poet to scientific administrator; from obscurity to fame on the BBC airwaves and in print; and, crucially, from literary intellectual who promoted the superior truthfulness of poetry and poets to scientific humanist insisting that science and scientists were the standard-bearers of truth. A cornerstone of Bronowski's humanist ideology was that Hiroshima and the bomb had become symbols of the public's distrust of science, whereas, in reality, science was merely a scapegoat for society's loss of moral compass; more correctly, he stressed, science and scientists epitomized positive moral values. When discussing atomic energy, especially after 1949, Bronowski not only downplayed the bomb's significance but was deliberately vague regarding Britain's atomic weapon development programme; this lack of candour was compounded by Bronowski's evasiveness regarding his own prior involvement with wartime bombing. The net effect was a substantial contribution to British scientific intellectuals' influential yet frequently misleading accounts of the relations between science and war in the early atomic era.


1981 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 283-306 ◽  

O. R. Frisch brought to physics the approach of a craftsman. He enjoyed, above all, doing experiments with his own hands, preferably on apparatus of his own design, aimed at simple basic questions. This approach required the ability to think about the important problems of physics simply, but deeply, an ability underlying the two contributions for which he was best known: his share in the explanation of the fission process and that in the recognition of the feasibility of an atomic weapon. The craftsman was also something of an artist, not only in his love for music and his skill and taste as a pianist and a violinist, but in the use of language, which made him an outstanding expositor. There were many problems, in physics and elsewhere, which he regarded as interesting, and these he pursued persistently, in depth, until he saw convincing answers in simple terms, and he evidently enjoyed himself in doing so. He equally firmly refused to become involved with matters other than those which he had decided were of interest to him.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document