On the Foraging Behavior of Beaked Whales and Other Deep Diving Odontocetes

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitlow W. Au ◽  
Marc O. Lammers
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Baumann-Pickering ◽  
John A. Hildebrand ◽  
Tina Yack ◽  
Jeffrey E. Moore

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1942) ◽  
pp. 20201905
Author(s):  
Jesús Alcázar-Treviño ◽  
Mark Johnson ◽  
Patricia Arranz ◽  
Victoria E. Warren ◽  
Carlos J. Pérez-González ◽  
...  

Echolocating animals that forage in social groups can potentially benefit from eavesdropping on other group members, cooperative foraging or social defence, but may also face problems of acoustic interference and intra-group competition for prey. Here, we investigate these potential trade-offs of sociality for extreme deep-diving Blainville′s and Cuvier's beaked whales. These species perform highly synchronous group dives as a presumed predator-avoidance behaviour, but the benefits and costs of this on foraging have not been investigated. We show that group members could hear their companions for a median of at least 91% of the vocal foraging phase of their dives. This enables whales to coordinate their mean travel direction despite differing individual headings as they pursue prey on a minute-by-minute basis. While beaked whales coordinate their echolocation-based foraging periods tightly, individual click and buzz rates are both independent of the number of whales in the group. Thus, their foraging performance is not affected by intra-group competition or interference from group members, and they do not seem to capitalize directly on eavesdropping on the echoes produced by the echolocation clicks of their companions. We conclude that the close diving and vocal synchronization of beaked whale groups that quantitatively reduces predation risk has little impact on foraging performance.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. E333-E344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara M. Maxwell ◽  
Jessica J. Frank ◽  
Greg A. Breed ◽  
Patrick W. Robinson ◽  
Samantha E. Simmons ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natacha Aguilar de Soto ◽  
Fleur Visser ◽  
Peter L. Tyack ◽  
Jesús Alcazar ◽  
Graeme Ruxton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 147 (6) ◽  
pp. 3849-3858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary Kates Varghese ◽  
Jennifer Miksis-Olds ◽  
Nancy DiMarzio ◽  
Kim Lowell ◽  
Ernst Linder ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 888-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter M. X. Zimmer ◽  
Peter L. Tyack
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 1312-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jade Vacquié-Garcia ◽  
Jérôme Mallefet ◽  
Frédéric Bailleul ◽  
Baptiste Picard ◽  
Christophe Guinet

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Outi M. Tervo ◽  
Susanne Ditlevsen ◽  
Manh C. Ngô ◽  
Nynne H. Nielsen ◽  
Susanna B. Blackwell ◽  
...  

Deep diving air-breathing species by necessity must balance submergence time and level of exercise during breath-holding: a low activity level preserves oxygen stores and allows longer duration submergence whereas high activity levels consume oxygen quickly and shorten submergence time. In this study, we combined high-resolution multi sensor animal-borne tag data to investigate diving behavior and locomotion styles of the narwhal (Monodon monoceros) (n = 13, mean record length 91 h)–a deep diving Arctic species. Narwhals in this study dove down to >800 m but despite the deep diving abilities, one-third of the dives (33%) were shallow (>100 m) and short in duration (<5 min). Narwhals utilized energy saving measures such as prolonged gliding during descent with increasing target depth but stroked actively throughout the ascent indicating excess oxygen storages. Foraging behavior, as detected by the presence of buzzes, was a key factor influencing dive depth and spinning behavior—the rolling movement of the animal along its longitudinal axes. Narwhals in East Greenland utilized two foraging strategies, while transiting and while stationary, with different target depths and buzzing rates. The first targeted deep-dwelling, possibly solitary prey items and the latter, more schooling prey closer to the surface. The buzzing rate during stationary foraging was on average twice as high as during transiting foraging. Spinning was an integrated part of narwhal swimming behavior but the amount of spinning was correlated with foraging behavior. The odds for spinning during all dive phases were 2–3 times higher during foraging than non-foraging. Due to the spinning behavior, stroking rate might be better suited for estimating energy consumption in narwhals than ODBA (overall dynamic body acceleration). The narwhal is considered as one of the most sensitive species to climate change–the results from this study can act as a baseline essential for evaluating changes in the behavior and energy usage of narwhals caused by stressors evolving in the Arctic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document