scholarly journals INFO-U FAXBACK: DELIVERING CONSUMER INFORMATION WITH FAX-ON-DEMAND TECHNOLOGY

HortScience ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 742c-742
Author(s):  
David E. Whiting

Consumers applaud the Minnesota Extension Service, INFO-U FAXBACK system that delivers consumer horticulture publications 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Consumers call the fax-on-demand system and, following voice instructions, use the phone key pad to enter their fax number and select a publication or a catalog of over 300 yard care and gardening titles. Documents selected are transmitted immediately to the fax number entered. Delivery cost runs $0.18 per document in the metro toll-free calling area, and $1.64 for long-distance calls. Compared to $2.75 for printing, postage, and handling per fact sheet sent by mail, the system saved $7000 in 1995 transmitting 2722 publications. Investment in system hardware and software runs $6000 to $8000. Documents can be stored as DOS text, which eliminates artwork and formatting, or scanned as graphic files that require 40 times more hard drive storage space. A document requires a one-time investment in staff time of 10–60 minutes to reformat for the fax-on-demand protocol.

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-317
Author(s):  
David E. Whiting

Through fax-on-demand technology, residents access selected extension service print information 24 hours a day, 7 days a week via touch tone phone. System hardware and software needs are reviewed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 3011-3016
Author(s):  
Cesar Augusto Viana Melo ◽  
Jhonathan Araujo Oliveira ◽  
Gustavo Bittencourt Figueiredo

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Van De Haar ◽  
Arno F. Schoenmakers ◽  
Edward S. Eilley ◽  
Douglas N. Tedd ◽  
Stephen A. Tickell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-105
Author(s):  
Doppy Roy Nendissa ◽  
Ratya Anindita ◽  
Nikmatul Khoiriyah ◽  
Ana Arifatus Sa’diyah

Households consume animal protein after carbohydrate food is fulfilled, moreover animal protein prices are increasing. This study aims to analyze the effect of rising beef prices on demand. The demand system approach uses the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) model. Estimation of parameters using Iterated non-linear Seemingly Unrelated Regression. The research data use the 2016 National Socio-Economic Survey (Susenas, 2016), amounting to 10,751 households. The results of the study concluded that beef is the third most elastic animal food after fresh fish and chicken meat. Fresh fish in the most elastic among all animal foods with a demand elasticity of 3.31%, followed by chicken, beef, milk powder, and eggs with demand elasticities of 1.55%, 1.62%, 1.29%, and 0.80%, respectively. Beef is a luxury item with an income elasticity of 1.59%, as well as fresh fish, chicken meat, and milk powder. While eggs are normal goods. Although fresh fish is more elastic than beef, beef marginal expenditure share (MES) is higher than fresh fish MES, so that in the long run, the increase in household income tends to increase beef consumption more than fresh fish.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document