Combining Ability, Genetic Distances, and Heterosis among Elite CIMMYT and IITA Tropical Maize Inbred Lines

Crop Science ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1201-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanda Dhliwayo ◽  
Kevin Pixley ◽  
Abebe Menkir ◽  
Marilyn Warburton
Euphytica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 204 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thokozile Ndhlela ◽  
Liezel Herselman ◽  
Kassa Semagn ◽  
Cosmos Magorokosho ◽  
Charles Mutimaamba ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siphiwokuhle Funani Shandu ◽  
John Derera ◽  
Kingston Mashingaidze ◽  
Edmore Gasura

Abstract An efficient hybrid breeding program defines and utilizes few heterotic groups. The objectives of this study were to determine genetic diversity and alignment of South Africa maize inbred lines collection towards tropical and temperate testers. Forty-two maize inbred lines were genotyped with 56110 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) DNA markers, using the Illumina MaizeSNP50 Bead chip. The 42 lines were crossed to two tropical and two temperate inbred line testers. The testcrosses were evaluated across seven environments, in South Africa, during 2014-2016. Genotypes and specific combining ability (SCA) effects of hybrids were significantly different (P<0.05) for grain yield. There was a weak correlation between molecular genetic distances and both grain yield mean and specific combining ability effects of hybrids, indicating that productivity of maize inbred lines could not be reliably determined based on molecular genetic distances. The SCA data was capable of classifying these maize inbred lines into three heterotic groups with respect to both tropical and temperate testers. Only a few lines could not be grouped on the basis of SCA data. The study also indicated high level of diversity among the maize inbred lines, which was shown by both the dendogram and molecular genetic distances. The SNP marker data classified the inbred lines into 11 clusters that could be simplified into three major groups of normal maize endosperm and two groups of quality protein maize (QPM) endosperm types. However, the SNP data indicated that maize lines were more aligned towards tropical than temperate inbred testers. This information would be useful for simplifying heterotic classification of the lines with profound implications for breeding progress.


2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.F.O.M. Durães ◽  
P.C. Magalhães ◽  
A.C. Oliveira ◽  
M.X. Santos ◽  
E.E.G. Gomes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. e53317
Author(s):  
Tauana Gibim Eisele ◽  
Dener Lazzari ◽  
Tereza Aparecida da Silva ◽  
Ronald José Barth Pinto ◽  
Robson Akira Matsuzaki ◽  
...  

Our objectives were to evaluate general and specific combining ability (SCA) and genetic divergence among tropical maize inbred lines using single sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Thirteen inbred lines were crossed based on a complete diallel scheme. Hybrids and three checks were evaluated in a lattice experimental design. Silk and anthesis flowering, average plant height, average ear height, white spot (Pantoea ananatis) and gray leaf spot (Cercospora zeae-maydis) severity, and grain yield were evaluated. Significant differences (p < 0.05) for general and specific combining abilities were observed for all traits. Based on additive effects, inbred lines 1 (Flash) and 12 (SG 6015) were selected to reduce the flowering period and plant and ear height. Inbred lines 2 (CD 303) and 3 (AG 8080) were selected to reduce disease severity. For the simultaneous increase in grain yield and reduced severity of diseases, line 11 (AG 9090) as a parent or tester in topcross schemes is recommended. According to non-additive effects, crosses 2 (CD 303) × 13 (DKB 747) and 11 (AG 9090) × 12 (SG 6015) were selected for grain yield and future breeding programs. Six groups were identified using SSR markers; a major group contained six inbred lines. Because of the minor relationship between genetic divergence and SCA effects on grain yield limits, the use of the groups for future divergent crosses is recommended.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao CUI ◽  
Ju-Lin GAO ◽  
Xiao-Fang YU ◽  
Zhi-Jun SU ◽  
Zhi-Gang WANG ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo-Xin WANG ◽  
Ya-Hui WANG ◽  
Peng-Fei CHEN ◽  
Xu-Dong-Yu LIU ◽  
Zhi-Qian FENG ◽  
...  

Euphytica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 215 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lívia Gomes Torres ◽  
Diego Gonçalves Caixeta ◽  
Wemerson Mendonça Rezende ◽  
Andreia Schuster ◽  
Camila Ferreira Azevedo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document