Professional teachers must have 5 (five) competencies, one of which is the competence of preparing lesson plans. There are several factors that cause teachers to have difficulty in compiling it 1) Teachers do not have a linear educational basis so they are not equipped with knowledge about planning and implementing learning. 2) Teachers have never attended training on RPP preparation so they only copy and paste from their friends, even though, they are not relevant to the situation and conditions in their school so that the existing RPP cannot be used as a reference in the learning process. 3) Teachers have attended training, but have not been able to apply it in schools. One of the programs that can be held in the context of teacher empowerment is academic supervision (academic supervision).This research was conducted in three stages, namely preparation, implementation and evaluation/reflection, and carried out at least in two cycles. This research is aimed at teachers of all subjects who do not have a linear teacher education background totaling 20 people, namely: 16 class teachers, 2 sports teachers, and 2 PAI teachers. In cycle I, this action research involved 5 subject teachers who did not have a teacher education background, who were in this school. The research begins by submitting a self-made lesson plan according to the subjects and competency standards of each to the supervisor. Based on these data, supervisors provide guidance to teachers according to the difficulties of each teacher. In the second cycle, planning activities are based on reflection from cycle 1, while the steps for action and observation activities are the same as in cycle 1 by paying attention to the priority problems concluded in cycle 1 and followed by reflection activities.The results showed, in the components of the formulation of learning objectives indicators, there was an increase from 40% in the initial ability, to 60% in cycle 1 and increased to 70% at the end of the activity. In the Determination Component of learning materials and there is an increase in ability from 65% to 70% after cycle 1 and is stronger to 80%. In the Component Selection of Strategies and learning methods, there was a significant increase from the original 40% to 60% in cycle 1 and increased again to 75% after cycle 2. In the selection of media and learning tools there was also an increase from 60% at the beginning activities and after cycle 1, it becomes 80% after cycle 2. While in terms of planning evaluation of learning. From the original only 40% at the beginning of the activity, to 60% at the end of cycle 1 and managed to reach 70% at the end of cycle 2.Keywords: Academic Supervision, Pedagogic Competency