Corn and Soybean Yield Response to Tillage, Rotation, and Nematicide Seed Treatment

Crop Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 1704-1712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon Mourtzinis ◽  
David Marburger ◽  
John Gaska ◽  
Thierno Diallo ◽  
Joe Lauer ◽  
...  
ael ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogendra Y. Raut ◽  
Vinayak S. Shedekar ◽  
Khandakar R. Islam ◽  
Javier M. Gonzalez ◽  
Dexter B. Watts ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Arthur Antonangelo ◽  
Ruan Francisco Firmano ◽  
Luís Reynaldo Ferracciú Alleoni ◽  
Adilson Oliveira ◽  
Hailin Zhang

2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 2143-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua T. Enderson ◽  
Antonio P. Mallarino ◽  
Mazhar U. Haq
Keyword(s):  

Plant Disease ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. 1735-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuba R. Kandel ◽  
Kiersten A. Wise ◽  
Carl A. Bradley ◽  
Albert U. Tenuta ◽  
Daren S. Mueller

A 2-year study was conducted in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, and Ontario in 2013 and 2014 to determine the effects of planting date, seed treatment, and cultivar on plant population, sudden death syndrome (SDS) caused by Fusarium virguliforme, and grain yield of soybean (Glycine max). Soybean crops were planted from late April to mid-June at approximately 15-day intervals, for a total of three to four plantings per experiment. For each planting date, two cultivars differing in SDS susceptibility were planted with and without fluopyram seed treatment. Mid-May plantings resulted in higher disease index compared with other planting dates in two experiments, early June plantings in three, and the remaining six experiments were not affected by planting date. Soil temperature at planting was not linked to SDS development. Root rot was greater in May plantings for most experiments. Resistant cultivars had significantly lower disease index than the susceptible cultivar in 54.5% of the experiments. Fluopyram reduced disease severity and protected against yield reductions caused by SDS in nearly all plantings and cultivars, with a maximum yield response of 1,142 kg/ha. Plant population was reduced by fluopyram seed treatment and early plantings in some experiments; however, grain yield was not affected by these reductions. Yields of plots planted in mid-June were up to 29.8% less than yields of plots planted in early May. The lack of correlation between early planting date and SDS severity observed in this study indicates that farmers do not have to delay planting in the Midwest to prevent yield loss due to SDS; cultivar selection combined with fluopyram seed treatment can reduce SDS in early-planted soybean (late April to mid May).


age ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren P. Bomeisl ◽  
Christopher Neill ◽  
Stephen Porder ◽  
Carlos E.P. Cerri ◽  
Paulo M. Brando ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 558-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley A. Bunselmeyer ◽  
Joseph G. Lauer
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Cullum ◽  
K. C. McGregor ◽  
C. K. Mutchler ◽  
J. R. Johnson ◽  
D. L. Boykin

Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2914-2920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn M. Bissonnette ◽  
Christopher C. Marett ◽  
Mark P. Mullaney ◽  
Gregory D. Gebhart ◽  
Peter M. Kyveryga ◽  
...  

ILeVO (fluopyram) is a fungicide seed treatment for soybean sudden death syndrome (SDS) that also has nematicidal activity. ILeVO is sold with a base of insecticide Poncho (clothianidin), nematode-protectant VOTiVO (Bacillus firmus), and Acceleron fungicides (metalaxyl, fluxapyroxad, and pyraclostrobin). Yield and reproduction of the soybean cyst nematode (SCN) (Heterodera glycines) on soybean plants grown from seed treated with ILeVO plus the base were compared with those treated with only the base in 27 small-plot experiments and 12 strip-trial experiments across Iowa from 2015 to 2017. To increase the likelihood that yield results were related to effects on SCN, data were used only from 26 small-plot experiments and 12 strip trials in which symptoms of SDS were low or nonexistent. An SCN reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each experimental unit by dividing the SCN population density at harvest by the population density at planting. ILeVO significantly reduced SCN RF by 50% in one strip-trial experiment and by 36 to 60% in four small-plot experiments but yields were not increased by ILeVO in any of those five experiments. Soybean yields were 2.8 to 3.7 bushels/acre (bu/ac) (188.3 to 248.8 kg/ha) greater with ILeVO in three small-plot experiments but SCN RF was not reduced in those experiments. Also, yield was 1.9 bu/ac (127.8 kg/ha) greater with ILeVO in one strip-trial experiment in 2016 but SCN samples were not collected at harvest from the study to assess the possible effects of ILeVO on SCN reproduction. When strip-trial data from 2015 and 2016 were combined, there was a small but significant 0.8 bu/ac (52.2 kg/ha) yield increase with ILeVO. Overall, the effects of ILeVO on SCN reproduction and soybean yield were variable in these field studies.


Author(s):  
John Lundvall ◽  
Keith Whigham ◽  
Mark E. Westgate ◽  
Dale E. Farnham

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document