Motor-Driven Portable Soil Core Sampler for Volumetric Sampling

1991 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1792-1795 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. H. Hendrickx ◽  
C. J. Ritsema ◽  
O. H. Boersma ◽  
L. W. Dekker ◽  
W. Hamminga ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (No. 6) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Prikner ◽  
F. Lachnit ◽  
F. Dvořák

The portable soil core sampler was engineered for gradual sampling of soil profile in the depth up to 0.5 m, which ensures extraction of the whole sample volume of soil profile in determinable depth. The portable soil core sampler was compared with the professional soil probe Eijkelkamp P1.31 (Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment, Netherlands) in field conditions. The portable sampler was compared with the physical soil sample rings in laboratory conditions to eliminate all of possible restrictive aspects affecting the procedure of measurement. The portable soil core sampler with inner diameter 71 mm, depth 120 mmenables gradually take samples of soil profile by step of 50 mmand is able to detect possible local extremes. On the other hand a soil probe is not able to reach desired accuracy in taking of a&nbsp;soil sample. Values measured from a soil probe approximately taken by step of 150 mmare inaccurate. The values of bulk density of both sampling methods were variable at significant interval from 40 into 80 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. Different values could be caused by soil profile condition and by the use of different sampling methods. The design of a portable soil sampler should be of assistance in fast and precise soil profiling sample collection, which is required to determine bulk density of the soil, its variance depending on moisture content in soil compaction determining criteria.


1982 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Chong ◽  
M. A. Khan ◽  
R. E. Green
Keyword(s):  

Soil Science ◽  
1958 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. ANDREWS ◽  
W. M. BROADFOOT
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-317
Author(s):  
P.K. Sharma ◽  
R.M. Bhagat

1950 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 447-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. W. Swanson
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 833-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Vinícius Folegatti ◽  
René Porfirio Camponez do Brasil ◽  
Flávio Favaro Blanco

In spatial variability studies of soil physical properties the influence of different samplers on the results is seldomly taken into account. The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of five different types of sampling equipment for soil bulk density determination, in two different soils a Kandiudalfic Eutrudox and a Typic Hapludox, both of Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Equipment used for soil undisturbed sampling were: (i) Uhland soil sampler; (ii) Kopecky's Ring; (iii) soil core sampler, model "Soil Moisture"; (iv) soil core sampler Bravifer AI-50 and (v) soil core sampler Bravifer AI-100. The sampling was made in 4 grids of 1m², each with 25 sampling points, with five replications, resulting 100 samples for each soil. It was concluded that the sampling techniques can influence soil bulk density distributions, mainly in the case of clayey soils (Kandiudalfic Eutrudox). The Kopecky's Ring presented larger soil density values, overestimating this property for the two soils studied. The soil core sampler Bravifer AI-50 presented results closest to the overall average of the Typic Hapludox.


1978 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. Ginn ◽  
Larry G. Heatherly ◽  
W. J. Russell
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document