Energy Efficiency and Economic Value in Affordable Housing

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Chegut ◽  
Piet M. A. Eichholtz ◽  
Rogier Holtermans

Energy Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Chegut ◽  
Piet Eichholtz ◽  
Rogier Holtermans


Author(s):  
Sarah C. Foster ◽  
Alison V. Tramba ◽  
Lindsay J. MacDonald


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 86-97
Author(s):  
Jan Slad ◽  
Andreas Pickard ◽  
Frank Strobelt

The transition of energy mix in Europe is placing greater focus on energy efficiency. Lawmakers in some of EU countries have already recognized that combined heat and power generation (cogeneration, CHP) can help increase energy efficiency. Targeted promotion and subsidization have raised the cost-effective profitability of cogeneration plants significantly. But how can the economic value of this investment be maximized?



2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 2492-2509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piet Eichholtz ◽  
Nils Kok ◽  
John M Quigley

This paper provides the first credible evidence on the economic value of “green buildings” derived from impersonal market transactions rather than engineering estimates. We analyze clusters of certified green and nearby buildings, establishing that “rated” buildings command substantially higher rents and selling prices than otherwise identical buildings. Variations in premiums are systematically related to energy-saving characteristics. Increased energy efficiency is associated with increased selling prices -- beyond the premiums paid for a labeled building. Evidence suggests that the intangible effects of the label itself may also play a role in determining the values of green buildings in the marketplace. (JEL G31,M14,Q52,R33)





2019 ◽  
Vol 266 ◽  
pp. 03013
Author(s):  
Abdulazeez U. Raji

Energy efficiency is fundamental to enhancing homes affordability. There are several unique challenges to affordable housing that owner-developers need to address in order for energy efficiency to make significant economic sense. Issues such as Transaction Costs (TCs) plays a significant role in achieving building energy efficiency (BEE) for affordable housing delivery. It is evident that split incentives, information asymmetry, institutional transition, opportunistic behavior, and ill-informed users incur different levels of TCs and affect stakeholder’s willingness to take part in BEE for affordable housing. A better understanding of the nature and structure of TCs is indispensable to enhance the market-drive and investment for BEE affordable housing. Uncertainty, specific investment, frequency, and bounded rationality seen as the key dimensions of TCs. The research focuses on how to minimize TCs involve in BEE affordable housing delivery. It was found in the literature that, the level of TCs for building energy efficiency estimated at 20.5% of total project costs. A conceptual competency-driven benefits realization model is proposed for minimizing TCs taking into consideration the peculiarities of the current housing projects delivery. This research aims to establish the significance of leveraging on BEE project team-competency and commitment organized within a strategic Benefits Realization Management framework to optimize client‘s benefits regarding minimizing TCs. The focus is on the aspect of a developer’s competencies and their project team commitment concerning minimizing TCs that structured within a Benefits Realization Management (BRM) practice. This model is proposed as a pro-active enabler tool to achieve Value for Money in BEE affordable housing projects. This paper is part of a series of publications.



1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C. Diamond ◽  
J.A. McAllister ◽  
H.E. Feustel ◽  
C. Patullo ◽  
T. Buckley


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document