scholarly journals Does Social Capital Matter in Corporate Decisions? Evidence from Corporate Tax Avoidance

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iftekhar Hasan ◽  
Chun Keung (Stan) Hoi ◽  
Qiang Wu ◽  
Hao Zhang
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
IFTEKHAR HASAN ◽  
CHUN-KEUNG STAN HOI ◽  
QIANG WU ◽  
HAO ZHANG

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Keung (Stan) Hoi ◽  
Iftekhar Hasan ◽  
Qiang Wu ◽  
Hao Zhang

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-565
Author(s):  
Justin Chircop ◽  
Michele Fabrizi ◽  
Elisabetta Ipino ◽  
Antonio Parbonetti

Purpose This paper aims to investigate whether the level of social capital of the region in which a firm is headquartered affects its tax avoidance activities. Social capital can be defined as the mutual trust in society and literature shows that firms headquartered in high social capital regions exhibit higher level of corporate social responsibility. Recent research suggests that some stakeholders consider tax avoidance as a socially irresponsible and illegitimate activity, whereas others deem corporate tax payments as detrimental to social welfare because they hurt economic development. Building on this debate, the relationship between social capital and tax avoidance is empirically investigated. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 52,962 firm-year observations over the period 1990-2014 was used to empirically investigate the relationship between social capital and tax avoidance. Findings Consistent with the idea that managers consider corporate tax payments as a socially responsible action, evidence was found that firms headquartered in areas with high social capital engage significantly less in tax avoidance activities. It was also documented that the negative impact of social capital on tax avoidance is stronger in the presence of high religiosity, high corporate performance and lower sensitivity of CEO’s compensation to stock volatility. Originality/value This paper extends research on social capital and improves the understanding of the effect of the social environment on managerial decision. Importantly, by studying the relationship between social capital and tax avoidance, the authors add to the recent debate on companies’ perception of the desirability of tax avoidance activities from a social viewpoint.


Author(s):  
Thomas R. Kubick ◽  
G. Brandon Lockhart ◽  
John R. Robinson

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1477-1502
Author(s):  
Zi-Yun Zhou ◽  
Yu-Zhe Tang ◽  
Beom-Koing Seo ◽  
Kyu-Heak Yang
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan F. Hess ◽  
Raquel Meyer Alexander

ABSTRACT This instructional case explores the ethical issues surrounding the corporate tax-planning and tax-avoidance strategies of multinational organizations. Drawing on the real-world experiences of SABMiller, one of the world's largest beverage companies, this case provides a launching point for students to consider the ethics of corporate tax planning. The ethics of multinational tax practices, especially the use of tax havens, has recently become the focus of media and legislative debate in both the U.S. and the U.K., and many well-respected companies, such as General Electric, Apple Inc., and Starbucks are now feeling the pressure to reform. In a post-case learning assessment, students demonstrated significant improvement in their understanding and indicated that they enjoyed discussing this controversial issue. The “Implementation Guidance” section and Teaching Notes offer guidance for in-class discussion of the ethical and tax issues in this case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document