Portfolio Choice toward Long-Term Mutual Funds in Thailand

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adisorn Promkaewngarm ◽  
Jirarat Pipatnarapong ◽  
Natdanai Aleenajitpong ◽  
Sompong Promsa-ad
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5000
Author(s):  
Iqbal Owadally ◽  
Jean-René Mwizere ◽  
Neema Kalidas ◽  
Kalyanie Murugesu ◽  
Muhammad Kashif

We consider whether sustainable investment can deliver performance comparable to conventional investment in investors’ long-term retirement plans. On the capital markets, sustainable investment can be achieved through various instruments and strategies, one of them being investment in mutual funds that subscribe to ESG (environmental, social, and governance) principles. First, we compare the investment performance of ESG funds with matched conventional funds over the period 1994–2020, in Europe and the U.S. We find no significant evidence of differing performance (at 5% level) despite using a number of investment performance metrics. Second, we perform a historical backtest to model a UK personal retirement plan from 2000 till 2020, taking full account of investment management fees and transaction costs. We find that investing in an index-tracker fund overlaid with ESG screening delivers a pension which is 10.4% larger than is achieved if the index-tracker fund is used without screening. This is also 20.2% larger than is achieved by investing in a collection of actively managed funds with a sustainable purpose. We conclude that an ESG-screened long-term passive investment approach for retirement plans is likely to be successful in satisfying the twin objectives of a secure retirement income and of sustainability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1491-1504
Author(s):  
Sangkyun Hyun ◽  
Jeongseok Lee ◽  
Joon-hee Rhee

Sangkyun Hyun(Soongsil University) Jeongseok Lee(Soongsil University) Joon-hee Rhee(Soongsil


2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 22-37
Author(s):  
Edwin J. Elton ◽  
Martin J. Gruber

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Guillén ◽  
Søren Fiig Jarner ◽  
Jens Perch Nielsen ◽  
Ana M. Pérez-Marín

The impact of administrative costs on the distribution of terminal wealth is approximated using a simple formula applicable to many investment situations. We show that the reduction in median returns attributable to administrative fees is usually at least twice the amount of the administrative costs charged for most investment funds, when considering a risk-adjustment correction over a reasonably long-term time horizon. The example we present covers a number of standard cases and can be applied to passive investments, mutual funds, and hedge funds. Our results show investors the potential losses they face in performance due to administrative costs.


Author(s):  
C. Alteen ◽  
Veit Wohlgemuth

Actuality of the study: Mutual funds are a favourite investment product among many investors. They provide a simple means of diversification, especially for those with smaller amounts of capital, and the popularity of mutual funds has increased with the success of the marketing efforts behind them.Purpose: This study evaluates the performance of actively managed and index mutual funds within the Canadian equities market.Findings: As index investing has increased in popularity, and other markets have become more connected and open, there is a need for research on equity mutual funds in countries outside the US.Originality / Value: The majority of previous research on index funds and actively managed mutual funds is focused on the US market and related indexes such as the S&P 500.Practical implications: This study suggests that, on average, active funds in Canada fail to beat their benchmarks net (but not gross) of the common fee or management expense ratio. Surprisingly, this research finds no positive relationship between higher fees and better gross performance. Actively managed funds also have poorer performance over the long term. This study finds that investors would be better off purchasing low cost index funds as they provide a more secure return.Future research: This study endorses research on other markets with inclusion of additional variables in order to explain gross performance and secure returns.


2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 284-292
Author(s):  
Daniel Wiberg

This paper compare Swedish long-term bond funds’ returns against the OMRX-TBond, which is the major index of long-term bonds issued by the Swedish National Debt Office and other major Swedish bond issuers. The evaluation is made on a total return level as well as on a risk-adjusted basis. To measure risk-adjusted performance a performance measure developed by Modigliani and Modigliani (1997) is used. The main advantage with the Modigliani-measure is that it measures performance in basis points like the original return of any asset. By using the Modigliani-measure the study illustrates the importance of risk-adjustment when comparisons are made between benchmarks, such as an index, and mutual funds or portfolios investing in that particular market. When risk-adjusted, the performance of many of the Swedish mutual funds improved noticeably, most of them however, still underperform the index OMRX-TBond by a few percentage points when risk-adjusted with the M2-model. This result gives support to the idea originally presented by Sharpe (1966) and Jensen (1968), that the majority of mutual funds significantly underperform the market


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 566-577
Author(s):  
Budi Frensidy ◽  
Reynardo Nainggolan ◽  
Robiyanto Robiyanto

In this study, we explore the consistency of Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) – denominated equity mutual funds offered in Indonesia from 2007 to 2017 from various holding periods, namely one year, three years, and five years. Two questions are addressed. Will the winning mutual funds be the winner in the following period? Is the performance of a longer period more persistent than that of the shorter period? Using the nominal return from these eleven years, we find that the equity mutual funds in Indonesia earn no stable performance. The winner will not always be the winner in the following observed period. In addition, no evidence is found that long-term performance would result in a better persistence than that of the shorter time frame.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document