scholarly journals Risk-Adjusted Impact of Administrative Costs on the Distribution of Terminal Wealth for Long-Term Investment

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Guillén ◽  
Søren Fiig Jarner ◽  
Jens Perch Nielsen ◽  
Ana M. Pérez-Marín

The impact of administrative costs on the distribution of terminal wealth is approximated using a simple formula applicable to many investment situations. We show that the reduction in median returns attributable to administrative fees is usually at least twice the amount of the administrative costs charged for most investment funds, when considering a risk-adjustment correction over a reasonably long-term time horizon. The example we present covers a number of standard cases and can be applied to passive investments, mutual funds, and hedge funds. Our results show investors the potential losses they face in performance due to administrative costs.

2015 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 1550004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. George ◽  
Chuan-Yang Hwang

We examine voluntary and mandated disclosure of portfolio holdings by investment funds in a model where funds are characterized as having a stream of investment ideas and as providing liquidity to investors through redemption. We show that the greater is the fund's liquidity provision role, the more aggressively the fund trades on its ideas, the stronger is its preference to disclose information about its holdings voluntarily, and the weaker is its performance. We also show that mandatory disclosure can decrease information available in securities markets by crowding out the acquisition of private information that, through funds' trading, would be reflected in prices. Our model provides an explanation for why hedge funds and mutual funds differ in their resistance to public disclosure, and is consistent with stylized facts regarding how funds' investment decisions respond to poor performance and how differences in disclosure policies affect the future performance of well versus poorly performing funds.


2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 284-292
Author(s):  
Daniel Wiberg

This paper compare Swedish long-term bond funds’ returns against the OMRX-TBond, which is the major index of long-term bonds issued by the Swedish National Debt Office and other major Swedish bond issuers. The evaluation is made on a total return level as well as on a risk-adjusted basis. To measure risk-adjusted performance a performance measure developed by Modigliani and Modigliani (1997) is used. The main advantage with the Modigliani-measure is that it measures performance in basis points like the original return of any asset. By using the Modigliani-measure the study illustrates the importance of risk-adjustment when comparisons are made between benchmarks, such as an index, and mutual funds or portfolios investing in that particular market. When risk-adjusted, the performance of many of the Swedish mutual funds improved noticeably, most of them however, still underperform the index OMRX-TBond by a few percentage points when risk-adjusted with the M2-model. This result gives support to the idea originally presented by Sharpe (1966) and Jensen (1968), that the majority of mutual funds significantly underperform the market


2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre D. Chateau

Abstract The financial model presented in the article attempts to further integrate capital budgeting into the firm's overall financial planning policy. Although it is an extension and generalization of Bernhard and Weingartner's previous models, it differs from these works by some basic assumptions related to both the objective function and constraint set. First, the objective function stresses the growing role of managerial discretion as opposed to the common assumption of maximizing shareholders' wealth. In particular we assume that managers wish to maximize the size of the firm under their control at the end of some future time horizon. Since net cash flows of the investment projects selected are sources of future investment funds, the managers try to keep the shareholders' dividends to a minimum level, sufficient enough however to pacify them. Secondly, the model constraints embody the complete set of financial instruments available to the corporation managers: in a sense, this enlarges the previous models' short-term external financing facilities by considering simultaneously the alternative long-term external financial instruments, namely equity and bond issues. In the latter case, the refunding features are incorporated in the constraints. The constraints also imply that managers prefer steady growth of net cash flows through time. This contrasts with the usual maximization approach which has been shown to favor long-term investment projects with somewhat more erratic net cash flows. The derivation of the Kuhn and Tucker conditions for the model allows us to show the impact of the opportunity cost of the various instruments on that of the liquidity requirement and the investment projects selection criterion. Finally, the duality properties also highlight the reciprocal relationships existing between the various opportunity costs, both internal and external.


Author(s):  
Spangler Timothy

This book provides a clear and concise dual US/UK and pan-asset analysis on the legal and regulatory issues that arise in connection with private investment funds. The book advises on the structuring, formation, and operation of a range of asset classes, including hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate funds, and other non-retail collective investment vehicles. This edition has been revised to reflect the numerous and significant developments in financial services regulation on both sides of the Atlantic since the publication of the second edition. More elements of the Dodd Frank financial regulatory reforms, which increased the scope and reach of regulation applicable to private funds, have been implemented and commented on in this edition. In relation to European regulation, the impact of the commencement of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) has also now been analysed. The US/UK approach is maintained, but this edition now also includes consideration of third countries, particularly the Middle East and Asia. An entirely new chapter is dedicated to litigation and regulatory enforcement, and some treatment is given to the effects of the global financial crisis, in particular the regulatory response and the changes to negotiating leverage of fund managers and fund investors. The potential impact of ‘Brexit’ on the United Kingdom private funds industry and the future of the AIMFD and European private funds is also examined.


2005 ◽  
Vol 08 (06) ◽  
pp. 763-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID HOBSON ◽  
JEREMY PENN

Let Xϕ denote the trading wealth generated using a strategy ϕ, and let CT be a contingent claim which is not spanned by the traded assets. Consider the problem of finding the strategy which maximizes the probability of terminal wealth meeting or exceeding the claim value at some fixed time horizon, i.e., of finding [Formula: see text]. This problem is sometimes referred to as the quantile hedging problem. We consider the quantile hedging problem when the traded asset and the contingent claim are correlated geometric Brownian motions. This fits with several important examples. One of the benefits of working with such a concrete model is that although it is incomplete we can still do calculations. In particular, we can consider some detailed issues such as the impact of the timing at which information about CT is revealed.


Author(s):  
Romain Ragonnet ◽  
Guillaume Briffoteaux ◽  
Bridget M. Williams ◽  
Julian Savulescu ◽  
Matthew Segal ◽  
...  

AbstractStrategies are needed to minimise the impact of COVID-19 in the medium-to-long term, until safe and effective vaccines can be used. Using a mathematical model in a formal optimisation framework, we identified contact mitigation strategies that minimised COVID-19-related mortality over a time-horizon of 15 months while achieving herd immunity in six or 12 months, in Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. We show that manipulation of social contacts by age can reduce the impact of COVID-19 considerably in the presence of intense transmission. If immunity was persistent, the optimised scenarios would result in herd immunity while causing a number of deaths considerably lower than that observed during the March-April European wave in Belgium, France, Spain and Sweden, whereas the numbers of deaths required to achieve herd immunity would be comparable to somewhat larger that the past epidemics in Italy and the UK. Our results also suggest that countries’ herd immunity thresholds may be considerably lower than first estimated for SARS-CoV-2. If post-infection immunity was short-lived, ongoing contact mitigation would be required to prevent major epidemic resurgence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 609-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Clark Durant ◽  
Michael Weintraub ◽  
Daniel Houser ◽  
Shuwen Li

Why is it so hard to get opposing elites to work together rather than to seek partisan gains and/or political survival? While the credible commitment problem is widely known, there are a number of lesser known obstacles to building trust and trustworthiness between opposing elites. This article presents an account of how some of those obstacles interact through time. Common institutional types, particularly winner-takes-all and power-sharing institutions, force trade-offs between agile responses in the short term and medium-term trust between elites, on the one hand, and between trust among elites in the medium term and the adaptability of agreements in the long term, on the other. We call this the ‘time horizon trilemma’. As an alternative approach, we consider a variant on the two-person consulate used by the Roman Republic for more than 400 years as Rome rose to prominence. In our variant, a ‘turn-taking institution’, opposing executives take short alternating turns as the ultimate decisionmaker within one term. We conduct behavioral games in the experimental lab to provide an initial estimate of the impact of these institutional types – winner-takes-all, requiring consensus only, requiring turn-taking only, or requiring both – on overcoming obstacles to agile responses in the short term, trust among elites in the medium term, and adaptability of agreements in the long term. We find that turn-taking is a promising alternative to solving the time horizon trilemma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 113-120
Author(s):  
Arthur Guarino ◽  
Wenjing Wang

It has been a long-held principle in corporate finance that a company’s dividend payments must come from its net profits. Also, that the dividends paid to a company’s shareholders, whether holders of common or preferred stock, are entitled to some of those net profits in the form of dividends as a reward for investing and the risk involved. These concepts have been used in countless textbooks dealing with finance, accounting, and investments and has served as a basis for investors to purchase common or preferred stock throughout the decades. A company’s performance is often measured by how much dividends have increased over the years and whether it is a good long-term investment for individual investors, pension funds, mutual funds, and hedge funds. However, in recent years, the trend is changing in that corporations issuing common or preferred stock are paying dividends, not based on the amount of net profits they have made but based on the amount of financial capital that can be borrowed. A corporation may not necessarily make shareholders aware of this tactic as long as it adheres to its long-stated dividend policy and that they are receiving regular dividend payments whether they are increasing over time or remaining the same. The corporation could, in theory, maintain this method of paying dividends as long as the shareholders are satisfied and content with their cashflow from their equity investment in the company. But, in the long run, the corporation may actually be misleading shareholders as well as damaging the company’s financial situation by overextending itself with too much debt.


1995 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Blais ◽  
Pierre Martin ◽  
Richard Nadeau

AbstractWhy are Quebeckers favourably disposed or opposed to sovereignty? This choice partly depends upon the prospective evaluation of the costs and benefits of sovereignty and federalism. What are the relative contributions of economic and linguistic expectations in this choice? Does the impact of these expectations vary according to the time horizon in which they are set? The authors approach these questions from the perspective of the economic theory of voting and with the help of original measures of the determinants of support for sovereignty. They compare expectations of what would occur to the economy and to the French language were Quebec to become a sovereign country with expectations of what would occur if Quebec remained a province of Canada. These measures are taken from a survey of university students. Our logistic regression analysis shows that the implicit calculation of costs and benefits plays a significant role in the choice between sovereignty and federalism, and that economic expectations influence the formation of opinion to a somewhat greater degree than do linguistic expectations. Moreover, medium-term expectations are more important than short-term economic expectations and more important than long-term expectations about the situation of the French language in Quebec.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-197
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Perez

Abstract In this paper I focus on analyzing whether Polish absolute return funds, which I call quasi-hedge funds, add value to a portfolio of an individual investor by reaching higher returns than Polish stock funds. I use a sample of 25 Polish absolute return investment funds to contrast their short and long term performance, measured by Sharpe, Sortino and Jensen ratios, to the short and long term performance of 20 biggest Polish stock funds and build rankings based on that performance. Later I build funds of funds (with a different number of stock funds and/or quasi-hedge funds) and check which of them is the most efficient. I find out that in both short and long term Polish quasi-hedge funds have better returns than stock funds and they add much value to the investors’ portfolios. It can be explained by the fact that they are much smaller and younger than traditional funds, so they have much higher potential to grow and reach abnormal returns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document