scholarly journals On Unbalanced Data and Common Shock Models in Stochastic Loss Reserving

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Avanzi ◽  
Greg Taylor ◽  
Phuong Anh Vu ◽  
Bernard Wong
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Benjamin Avanzi ◽  
Greg Taylor ◽  
Phuong Anh Vu ◽  
Bernard Wong

Abstract Introducing common shocks is a popular dependence modelling approach, with some recent applications in loss reserving. The main advantage of this approach is the ability to capture structural dependence coming from known relationships. In addition, it helps with the parsimonious construction of correlation matrices of large dimensions. However, complications arise in the presence of “unbalanced data”, that is, when (expected) magnitude of observations over a single triangle, or between triangles, can vary substantially. Specifically, if a single common shock is applied to all of these cells, it can contribute insignificantly to the larger values and/or swamp the smaller ones, unless careful adjustments are made. This problem is further complicated in applications involving negative claim amounts. In this paper, we address this problem in the loss reserving context using a common shock Tweedie approach for unbalanced data. We show that the solution not only provides a much better balance of the common shock proportions relative to the unbalanced data, but it is also parsimonious. Finally, the common shock Tweedie model also provides distributional tractability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 1109-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Avanzi ◽  
Greg Taylor ◽  
Bernard Wong

AbstractThe paper is concerned with multiple claim arrays. In recognition of the extensive use by practitioners of large correlation matrices for the estimation of diversification benefits in capital modelling, we develop a methodology for the construction of such correlation structures (to any dimension). Indeed, the literature does not document any methodology by which practitioners, who often parameterise those correlations by means of informed guesswork, may do so in a disciplined and parsimonious manner.We construct a broad and flexible family of models, where dependency is induced by common shock components. Models incorporate dependencies between observations both within arrays and between arrays. Arrays are of general shape (possibly with holes), but include the usual cases of claim triangles and trapezia that appear in the literature. General forms of dependency are considered with cell-, row-, column-, diagonal-wise, and other forms of dependency as special cases. Substantial effort is applied to practical interpretation of such matrices generated by the models constructed here.Reasonably realistic examples are examined, in which an expression is obtained for the general entry in the correlation matrix in terms of a limited set of parameters, each of which has a straightforward intuitive meaning to the practitioner. This will maximise chance of obtaining a reliable matrix. This construction is illustrated by a numerical example.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-45
Author(s):  
Zhigao Wang ◽  
Xianyi Wu ◽  
Chunjuan Qiu

Abstract The projection of outstanding liabilities caused by incurred losses or claims has played a fundamental role in general insurance operations. Loss reserving methods based on individual losses generally perform better than those based on aggregate losses. This study uses a parametric individual information model taking not only individual losses but also individual information such as age, gender, and so on from policies themselves into account. Based on this model, this study proposes a computation procedure for the projection of the outstanding liabilities, discusses the estimation and statistical properties of the unknown parameters, and explores the asymptotic behaviors of the resulting loss reserving as the portfolio size approaching infinity. Most importantly, this study demonstrates the benefits of individual information on loss reserving. Remarkably, the accuracy gained from individual information is much greater than that from considering individual losses. Therefore, it is highly recommended to use individual information in loss reserving in general insurance.


Author(s):  
Ricardo P. Oliveira ◽  
Jorge A. Achcar ◽  
Josmar Mazucheli ◽  
Wesley Bertoli
Keyword(s):  

IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Le Wang ◽  
Meng Han ◽  
Xiaojuan Li ◽  
Ni Zhang ◽  
Haodong Cheng

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document