Explicit Measures of Impacts of Transaction Taxes as Market Cooling Measure: Evidence from the Sellers’ Stamp Duty in Singapore Housing Market

Author(s):  
Yongheng Deng ◽  
Yong Tu ◽  
Yanjiang ZHANG
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-33
Author(s):  
Marcin Bielecki ◽  
Nikolai Stähler

We use a New Keynesian DSGE model with search frictions on the housing market to evaluate how financing a labor tax reduction by higher property taxation affects the real economy and welfare. Search on the housing market enables us to explicitly model stocks and flows, which is necessary to differentiate between recurrent property taxes (levied on stocks) and property transaction taxes (levied to flows). We find that using recurrent property taxation as financing instrument outperforms other instruments although all policy measures increase aggregate economy-wide welfare. Our simulations suggest that using property transaction taxation as financing instrument is the least favorable measure.


2014 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Besley ◽  
Neil Meads ◽  
Paolo Surico
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Lundborg ◽  
Per Skedinger

2021 ◽  
pp. 101330
Author(s):  
Siu Kei Wong ◽  
Ka Shing Cheung ◽  
Kuang Kuang Deng ◽  
Kwong Wing Chau

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-501
Author(s):  
Charles Leung ◽  
◽  
Tin Cheuk Leung ◽  
Kwok Ping Tsang ◽  
◽  
...  

We study the implications of a property market transaction tax. As property buyers are obligated to pay a transaction tax ("stamp duty¨ or SD) where the rate increases with the value of the transaction, there are incentives to trade at the cutoff points of the tax schedule or just below them. Thus, both ¡§bunching in transactions¡¨ and ¡§underpricing¡¨ should be observed near those cutoffs. Furthermore, the bunching points should change with the tax schedule. We confirm these conjectures with a rich dataset from the Hong Kong housing market and provide a measure of tax avoidance.


Author(s):  
Pieter Van Dessel ◽  
Jan De Houwer ◽  
Anne Gast ◽  
Colin Tucker Smith

Prior research suggests that repeatedly approaching or avoiding a certain stimulus changes the liking of this stimulus. We investigated whether these effects of approach and avoidance training occur also when participants do not perform these actions but are merely instructed about the stimulus-action contingencies. Stimulus evaluations were registered using both implicit (Implicit Association Test and evaluative priming) and explicit measures (valence ratings). Instruction-based approach-avoidance effects were observed for relatively neutral fictitious social groups (i.e., Niffites and Luupites), but not for clearly valenced well-known social groups (i.e., Blacks and Whites). We conclude that instructions to approach or avoid stimuli can provide sufficient bases for establishing both implicit and explicit evaluations of novel stimuli and discuss several possible reasons for why similar instruction-based approach-avoidance effects were not found for valenced well-known stimuli.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Lilienthal ◽  
Elaine Tamez ◽  
Nathan Rose ◽  
Joel Myerson ◽  
Sandra Hale

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document