Arbitration & Public Policy as a Challenge to Arbitral Proceedings

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Goyo
Author(s):  
Blackaby Nigel ◽  
Partasides Constantine ◽  
Redfern Alan ◽  
Hunter Martin

This chapter outlines the conduct of the tribunal and the parties during arbitration proceedings. In general, an arbitral tribunal must conduct the arbitration in accordance with the procedure agreed by the parties. If it fails to do so, the award may be set aside, or refused recognition and enforcement. However, the freedom of the parties to dictate the procedure to be followed in an international arbitration is not unrestricted. The procedure must comply with any mandatory rules and public policy requirements of the law of the juridical seat of the arbitration. It must also take into account the provisions of the international rules on arbitration, such as those of the ICC, which aim to ensure that arbitral proceedings are conducted fairly. Accordingly, a balance must be struck between the parties’ wishes concerning the procedure to be followed and any overriding requirements of the legal regime that governs the arbitration.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Morbach

When a state court has to decide whether to enforce or to set aside an arbitral award, it examines whether the enforcement of the award would violate fundamental principles of the forum - its public policy (ordre public). Competition law provisions that are part of these principles form the state's public competition policy. It comes into play not only during the review of the arbitral award, but affects the arbitral proceedings even before they are initiated. This thesis examines all these effects and their role in ensuring the compliance of arbitral awards with competition law. While it represents the outcome of a Franco-German dissertation project, it takes into account numerous other legal systems as well.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 23-23
Author(s):  
George Lyons
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document