Identification of Labour Market Shocks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Ravazzolo ◽  
Josué Diwambuena
Keyword(s):  

Significance The EU is built around the 'four freedoms', which together form the core of the internal market. Economically, freedom of movement is meant to smooth out asymmetrical labour market shocks by allocating labour where it is needed most. In the past, intra-EU mobility has been relatively low and mostly reflected a widening welfare gap between older member states and those that joined after 2004. As a result, fears of 'welfare tourism' have risen, despite the fact that empirical evidence for it is scarce. Impacts The issue of welfare tourism will continue to dominate the debate. Who is eligible for what welfare payments in other member states will, therefore, continue to occupy courts across Europe. Because of the current refugee crisis, the rules on third-country nationals will come under scrutiny again.


Author(s):  
Ferdi Botha ◽  
John de New ◽  
Sonja C. de New ◽  
David C. Ribar ◽  
Nicolas Salamanca
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdi Botha ◽  
John P. Haisken-DeNew ◽  
Sonja C. de New ◽  
David Ribar ◽  
Nicolas Salamanca
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 130 (628) ◽  
pp. 1008-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Di Tella ◽  
Dani Rodrik

Abstract We study preferences for government action in response to layoffs resulting from different types of labour-market shocks. We consider: technological change, a demand shift, bad management and three kinds of international outsourcing. Support for government intervention rises sharply in response to shocks and is heavily biased towards trade protection. Trade shocks generate more demand for protectionism and, among trade shocks, outsourcing to a developing country elicits greater demand for protectionism. The ‘bad management’ shock is the only scenario that induces a desired increase in compensatory transfers. Trump supporters are more protectionist than Clinton supporters, but preferences seem easy to manipulate: Clinton supporters primed with trade shocks are as protectionist as baseline Trump voters. Highlighting labour abuses in the exporting country increases the demand for trade protection by Clinton supporters but not Trump supporters.


Author(s):  
Ferdi Botha ◽  
John P. de New ◽  
Sonja C. de New ◽  
David C. Ribar ◽  
Nicolás Salamanca
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Hupkau ◽  
Ingo E. Isphording ◽  
Stephen J. Machin ◽  
Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document