Valproic Acid as Adjuvant Treatment for Convulsive Status Epilepticus

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Sharshar ◽  
Raphael Porcher ◽  
Pierre Asfar ◽  
Lamiae Grimaldi ◽  
Jabot Julien ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Sharshar ◽  
Omar Ben Hadj Salem ◽  
Raphael Porcher ◽  
Lamiae Grimaldi ◽  
Nicholas Heming ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a frequent medical emergency. Treatment focuses on administration of benzodiazepines followed by a second line antiepileptic drug (AED). Despite this stepwise strategy, GCSE is not controlled in a quarter of patients and is associated with protracted hospitalization, high-mortality and long-term disability. OBJECTIVE We aimed to show that the administration of valproic acid (VPA) may be suited as a complement of the first and second-line treatment, because of antiepileptic efficacy, neuroprotective properties and good tolerability. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing VPA to placebo in adults admitted to intensive care units (ICU) for GCSE in France. All patients received standard of care including a benzodiazepine and a second-line AED (except VPA) at the discretion of the treating medical team. In the intervention arm, VPA was administered intravenously as a loading dose of 30mg/kg over 15 minutes followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg/h over the next 12 hours. In the placebo group, an identical IV administration of 0.9 % saline was used. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged alive from hospital by day 15. Secondary outcomes were frequency of refractory and super-refractory GCSE; ICU-related morbidity; adverse events related to VPA, and cognitive dysfunction at 3 months. Statistical analyses will be performed according to the intent-to-treat principle. Ethics Committee of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France, initial approval received on May 14 2012. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences. RESULTS The first patient was randomized on February 18, 2013 and the last patient on July 7, 2018. 245 (99%) out of 248 planned patients were enrolled across 20 ICUs. At present, data management is still ongoing, and all parties involved in the trial remain blinded.Research CONCLUSIONS This is the first multicentre randomized double-blind controlled trial that assesses whether Valproic Acid can be useful as an adjuvant therapy to recommended first and second line anti-epileptic drugs for improving the outcome of GCSE. CLINICALTRIAL NCT01791868 (registered on May 2012).


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-57
Author(s):  
Kyle C McKenzie ◽  
Cecil D Hahn ◽  
Jeremy N Friedman

Abstract This guideline addresses the emergency management of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) in children and infants older than 1 month of age. It replaces a previous position statement from 2011, and includes a new treatment algorithm and table of recommended medications based on new evidence and reflecting the evolution of clinical practice over the past several years. This statement emphasizes the importance of timely pharmacological management of CSE, and includes some guidance for diagnostic approach and supportive care.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155005942199171
Author(s):  
Adriana Gómez Domínguez ◽  
Raidili C. Mateo Montero ◽  
Alba Díaz Cid ◽  
Antonio J. P. Mazarro ◽  
Ignacio R. Bailly-Bailliere ◽  
...  

Introduction. Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) has been traditionally a challenging electroencephalographic (EEG) diagnosis. For this reason, Salzburg consensus criteria (SCC) have been proposed to facilitate correct diagnosis. Methods. We retrospectively reanalyzed 41 cases referred to our department (from 2016 to 2018) under the suspicion of NCSE. In this study, we compared the original description (standard criteria) versus the updated description (SCC) of the same EEG. Results. Originally, 15 patients were diagnosed as NCSE (37%) and 26 patients as no NCSE (63%), using the standard criteria. Then, we analyzed EEGs according to the SCC, which led to the following results: 9 patients fulfilled the criteria for definite NCSE (22%), 20 patients were diagnosed as possible NCSE (49%) and 12 patients were diagnosed as no NCSE (29%). Subsequently, when we analyze the outcome of possible NCSE cases, we note that 50% of these patients presented mild-poor outcome (neurological deficits, deceased). Indeed, we observed worse outcomes in patients previously diagnosed as no NCSE and untreated, specifically post-anoxic cases. Conclusions. Salzburg criteria seem to be a useful tool to support NCSE diagnosis, introducing the category of possible NCSE. In our study, we observed that it contributes to improving the prognosis and management of the patients. However, more prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the accuracy of SCC.


Seizure ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Sinead Zeidan ◽  
Benjamin Rohaut ◽  
Hervé Outin ◽  
Francis Bolgert ◽  
Marion Houot ◽  
...  

Seizure ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Parreira ◽  
Luís Abreu ◽  
Ana Franco ◽  
Carla Bentes ◽  
Ana Rita Peralta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document