Burst Suppression During General Anesthesia and Postoperative Outcomes: Mini Review

In the last decade, burst suppression has been increasingly studied by many to examine whether it is a mechanism leading to postoperative cognitive impairment. Despite a lack of consensus across trials, the current state of research suggests that electroencephalogram (EEG) burst suppression, duration and EEG emergence trajectory may predict postoperative delirium (POD). A mini literature review regarding evidence about burst suppression impact and susceptibilities was conducted, resulting in conflicting studies. Primarily, studies have used different algorithm values to replace visual burst suppression examination, although many studies have since emerged showing that algorithms underestimate burst suppression duration. As these methods may not be interchangeable with visual analysis of raw data, it is a potential factor for the current heterogeneity between data. Even though additional research trials incorporating the use of raw EEG data are necessary, the data currently show that monitoring with commercial intraoperative EEG machines that use EEG indices to estimate burst suppression may help physicians identify burst suppression and guide anesthetic titration during surgery. These modifications in anesthetics could lead to preventing unfavorable outcomes. Furthermore, some studies suggest that brain age, baseline impairment, and certain medications are risk factors for burst suppression and postoperative delirium. These patient characteristics, in conjunction with intraoperative EEG monitoring, could be used for individualized patient care. Future studies on the feasibility of raw EEG monitoring, new technologies for anesthetic monitoring and titration, and patient-associated risk factors are crucial to our continued understanding of burst suppression and postoperative delirium.

Associated Factors and Prognostic Implications of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus in Ischemic Stroke Patients With Impaired Consciousness

Background and Purpose: Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is common in patients with disorders of consciousness and can cause secondary brain injury. Our study aimed to explore the determinants and prognostic significance of NCSE in stroke patients with impaired consciousness.Method: Consecutive ischemic stroke patients with impaired consciousness who were admitted to a neuro intensive care unit were enrolled for this study. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with NCSE and their correlation with prognosis.Results: Among the 80 patients studied, 20 (25%) died during hospitalization, and 51 (63.75%) had unfavorable outcomes at the 3-month follow-up. A total of 31 patients (38.75%) developed NCSE during 24-h electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. Logistic regression revealed that NCSE was significantly associated with an increased risk of death during hospital stay and adverse outcomes at the 3-month follow-up. Patients with stroke involving the cerebral cortex or those who had a severely depressed level of consciousness were more prone to epileptogenesis after stroke.Conclusion: Our results suggest that NCSE is a common complication of ischemic stroke, and is associated with both in-hospital mortality and dependency at the 3-month follow-up. Long-term video EEG monitoring of stroke patients is, therefore required, especially for those with severe consciousness disorders (stupor or coma) or cortical injury.

Ictal Blinking: Reappraisal of the Lateralization and Localization Value in Focal Seizures

Introduction. Although ictal blinking is significantly more frequent in generalized epilepsy, it has been reported as a rare but useful lateralizing sign in focal seizures when it is not associated with facial clonic twitching. This study aimed to raise awareness of eye blinking as a semiological lateralizing sign. Method. Our database over an 11-year period reviewed retrospectively to assess patients who had ictal blinking associated with focal seizures. Results. Among 632 patients, 14 (2.2%), who had 3 to 13 (7 ± 3) seizures during video-EEG monitoring, were included. Twenty-five percent of all 92 seizures displayed ictal blinking and each patient had one to five seizures with ictal blinking. Ictal blinking was unilateral in 17%, asymmetrical in 22% and symmetrical in 61%. The blinking appeared with a mean latency of 6.3 s (range 0-39) after the clinical seizure-onset, localized most often to fronto-temporal, then in frontal or occipital regions. Blinking was ipsilateral to ictal scalp EEG lateralization side in 83% (5/6) of the patients with unilateral/asymmetrical blinking. The exact lateralization and localization of ictal activity could not have been determined via EEG in most of the patients with symmetrical blinking, remarkably. Conclusions. Unilateral/asymmetrical blinking is one of the early components of the seizures and appears as a useful lateralizing sign, often associated with fronto-temporal seizure-onset. Symmetrical blinking, on the other hand, did not seem to be valuable in lateralization and localization of focal seizures. Future studies using invasive recordings and periocular electrodes are needed to evaluate the value of blinking in lateralization and localization.

Comparison of Acute Withdrawal and Slow Taper of Antiseizure Medications during Video Electroencephalographic Monitoring: Efficacy for Shortening of Hospital Stay

Antiepileptic medications (ASMs) are withdrawn at the epilepsy monitoring unit to facilitate seizure recordings. The effect of rapid tapering of ASMs on the length of hospital stay has not been well documented. We compared the mean length of hospital stay between patients who underwent acute ASM withdrawal and slow dose tapering during long-term video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. We retrospectively investigated 57 consecutive patients admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit regarding the mean length of hospital stay in the acute ASM withdrawal group (n = 30) and slow-taper group (n = 27). In the acute-withdrawal group, all ASMs were discontinued once the patients were admitted. In the slow-taper group, the doses of ASMs were gradually reduced by 15–30% daily. We also evaluated the safety of the acute-withdrawal and slow-taper protocols. The mean lengths of hospital stay were 3.8 ± 1.92 and 5.2 ± 0.69 days in the acute-withdrawal and slow-taper groups, respectively (p < 0.005). No severe adverse events, including status epilepticus, were observed. Acute ASM withdrawal has the advantage of significantly reducing the length of hospital stay over slow tapering, without any severe adverse effects.

Diagnostic efficiency of monitoring methods of brain bioelectric activity in temporal lobe pharmacoresistant epilepsy

Background. The basis of pre-surgical neurophysiological examinations of patients with pharmaco-resistant structural epilepsy is the method of monitoring bioelectrical activity of the brain, video-electroencephalographic monitoring and, if indicated, long-term invasive monitoring.Objective. The goal of the study is to estimate the diagnostic efficacy of the methods used for monitoring of the brain bioelectric activity on the basis of longterm results of surgical treatment of patients with temporal structural pharmaco-resistant epilepsy.Design and methods. The study included 61 patients with temporal lobe pharmaco-resistant epilepsy, who were divided into two groups: performance of video-EEG monitoring only (33 patients) and the additional use of invasive monitoring for the localization of the epileptogenic zone (28 patients). Each group was divided into subgroups depending on the outcome of surgical treatment: patients, in whom seizures ceased (Engel 1) and patients in whom seizures persisted to some degree (Engel 2-3-4). Invasive monitoring with ictal event recording was chosen as the reference method to calculate diagnostic efficacy.Results. Invasive monitoring was performed as part of the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with temporal lobe pharmaco-resistant epilepsy with a higher sensitivity (72.7 %) and accuracy (82.4 %) than video-EEG monitoring (sensitivity 50 %, accuracy 45.9 %).Conclusion. In simple monofocal variants of structural epilepsy, video-EEG monitoring has a sufficient level of diagnostic efficiency. The phenomenon of neurophysiological phenotypes convergence is responsible for the reduced diagnostic efficacy of noninvasive and invasive monitoring.