Founding Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Evolution of Family Ownership and Firm Policies

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huimin Li ◽  
Harley E. Ryan
2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Wen Tsao ◽  
Shyh-Jer Chen ◽  
Chiou-Shiu Lin ◽  
William Hyde

The controversial findings of both high and low performance for family-controlled public firms offer a unique context in which to study the moderating role of high-performance work systems (HPWS) on founding-family ownership effects. In a sample of Taiwan-based public firms, founding-family ownership was found not to be associated with firm performance. However, when the level of HPWS facing family ownership was accounted for, the results showed that the relationship between founding-family ownership and firm performance is significantly negative for companies with lower levels of HPWS but is significantly positive for companies with higher levels of HPWS.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihwan Yeon ◽  
Michael S. Lin ◽  
Seoki Lee ◽  
Amit Sharma

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the moderating role of family involvement on the corporate social responsibility (CSR)-firm performance (FP) relationship in the US hospitality industry. Building on agency theory, this study examines how family ownership, management and board control influence the relationship between CSR and FP. Design/methodology/approach To examine the moderating effect of family ownership, family management and family board control, this study adopts the two-way fixed-effects model and performs a panel regression analysis with robust standard errors. The sample period spans 1994–2018 and 565 firm-year observations are included. Findings This study finds that the impact of CSR on FP is positively moderated by the extent of a firm’s family member involvement. In specific, all three aspects of corporate governance (i.e. ownership, management and board control) positively moderate the relationship between CSR and FP. Research limitations/implications Findings of this study yield several recommendations for hospitality managers, including shaping strategic decisions for implementing CSR, by providing a unique perspective that the involvement of founding family members can be helpful in enhancing firm value through CSR activities. Originality/value This study sheds light on the further understanding of the CSR-FP link in the hospitality literature. In addition, this study provides practical guidelines for hospitality firms in the context of CSR by revealing possible advantages of strengthened founding family involvement.


2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 1301-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald C. Anderson ◽  
David M. Reeb

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-131
Author(s):  
Margareta Bambang ◽  
Marko S. Hermawan

This research investigates the significant influence of family ownership on firm performance in order to provide information to decision makers and other interested parties. The analysis includes comparisons between family and non-family firm performance in Indonesia. The samples are taken from 31 consumer goods companies, listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange, ranging from 2005 to 2009. The results show that non-family firms perform better than family firms and no significant influence between family ownership and firms’ profitability. On the other hand, family ownership has negative contribution to firm market valuation. The study suggests that family firms have lower financial performance than that of non-family.  Family members within the top position have major control rights and contribute a negative influence to firm performance. The evidence raises concerns about possible profit manipulation and weak governance law in Indonesia, and as a result there is an expropriation of wealth to the majority and family related shareholders.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Habibatur Ridhah

The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity.. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner. Tujuan utama dari penulisan studi ini adalah untuk melakukan pengujian hubungan simultan antara aktivitas pengawasan dewan komisaris dan kinerja perusahaan dengan menggunakan sampel sebanyak 156 perusahaan. Penelitian ini menemukan bukti bahwa aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan, begitu juga sebaliknya, kinerja perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris. Studi ini juga menemukan bahwa jumlah kepemilikan keluarga, dan tingkat hutang mempengaruhi frekuensi aktivitas pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document