scholarly journals Fast Computation of the Economic Capital, the Value at Risk and the Greeks of a Loan Portfolio in the Gaussian Factor Model

Author(s):  
Pavel Okunev
2019 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 182-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Barrera ◽  
Stéphane Crépey ◽  
Babacar Diallo ◽  
Gersende Fort ◽  
Emmanuel Gobet ◽  
...  

We consider the problem of the numerical computation of its economic capital by an insurance or a bank, in the form of a value-at-risk or expected shortfall of its loss over a given time horizon. This loss includes the appreciation of the mark-to-model of the liabilities of the firm, which we account for by nested Monte Carlo à la Gordy and Juneja [17] or by regression à la Broadie, Du, and Moallemi [10]. Using a stochastic approximation point of view on value-at-risk and expected shortfall, we establish the convergence of the resulting economic capital simulation schemes, under mild assumptions that only bear on the theoretical limiting problem at hand, as opposed to assumptions on the approximating problems in [17] and [10]. Our economic capital estimates can then be made conditional in a Markov framework and integrated in an outer Monte Carlo simulation to yield the risk margin of the firm, corresponding to a market value margin (MVM) in insurance or to a capital valuation adjustment (KVA) in banking parlance. This is illustrated numerically by a KVA case study implemented on GPUs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Puspa Liza Ghazali ◽  
Riaman Riaman ◽  
Ristifani Ulfatmi

One way to calculate Value-at-Risk (VaR) is the variation-covariance method. The calculation of VaR covariance assumes stock data is normally distributed. The data needed to calculate VaR by the variance-covariance method is the covariance matrix of Bank Danamon and Bank Mandiri stock data. The main topics discussed in this paper are calculating VaR covariance with a simple cash portfolio approach, factor models and cash flow. For comparison of the use of the three approaches Backtesting, the backtest results indicate that the factor model is the best method.  


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ja'nel Esterhuysen ◽  
Paul Styger ◽  
Gary Wayne Van Vuuren

The management of operational value-at-risk (OpVaR) in financial institutions is presented by means of a novel, robust calculation technique and the influence of this value on the capital held by a bank for operational risk. A clear distinction between economic and regulatory capital is made, as well as the way OpVaR models may be used to calculate both types of capital. Under the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA), banks may employ OpVaR models to calculate regulatory capital; this article therefore illustrates the differences in regulatory capital when using the AMA and the Standardised Approach (SA), by means of an example. Economic capital is found to converge with regulatory capital using the AMA, but not if the SA is used.


2019 ◽  
pp. 116-131
Author(s):  
Hyun Song Shin

A system of interlinked balance sheets of intermediaries that follow the Value-at-risk rule has the feature that an increase in house prices transmits valuation changes through the value of debt instruments. The analysis uses the Vasicek credit risk model for the diversification of individual credit risks in the loan portfolio. Leverage and wholesale funding is key to understanding lending booms.


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
Frank Schuhmacher ◽  
Benjamin R. Auer
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document