Pharmacy practice model for academic medical centers

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (21) ◽  
pp. 1856-1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. Bush ◽  
Daniel M. Ashby ◽  
Roy Guharoy ◽  
Scott Knoer ◽  
Steven Rough ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Academic Medical Centers ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Academic Medical

scholarly journals A Survey of Opioid Medication Stewardship Practices at Academic Medical Centers

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Phelps ◽  
Thomas S. Achey ◽  
Katherine D. Mieure ◽  
Lourdes Cuellar ◽  
Heidemarie MacMaster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Academic Medical Centers ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Opioid Medication ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Smart Pump

Purpose: The results of a survey of academic medical centers assessing the presence and description of opioid stewardship activities. Methods: Academic medical centers within the Vizient University Health System Consortium Pharmacy Network were asked to complete a survey related to opioid stewardship activities. The survey consisted of 30 questions aimed at identifying current opioid stewardship practices among hospitals and health systems. Results: There were 27 respondents to the survey. Only 42.3% of respondents have opioid stewardship activities in place. Opioid stewardship practices are primarily linked to either formal consult services or the role of a clinical pharmacy specialist. Very few institutions have opioid stewardship embedded into the daily practice of clinical pharmacists. Just over half of respondents have pharmacists as part of a pain consult team. Principle roles of pharmacists on consult teams include provider education, patient education, and optimization of therapy outside of a collaborative practice or prescribing role. Over half of the respondents participating in stewardship maintain a pharmacist’s role in monitoring surgery and postoperative opioid prescribing. The majority of respondents have opioid medication policies in place to address range orders, smart pump programming of opioids, limits on meperidine use, and cumulative limits on acetaminophen dosing. Conclusion: There are limited examples of pharmacy services related to opioid stewardship. The authors believe this is a pharmacy practice model that will evolve with the national attention to the opioid epidemic and new Joint Commission Standards.

scholarly journals Changes in Pharmacy Residency Training Design Between 2012 and 2017: A Perspective of Academic Medical Centers

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Krasniak ◽  
William Darko ◽  
Christopher D. Miller ◽  
Robert Seabury ◽  
Luke A. Probst
Keyword(s):  
Residency Program ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Academic Medical Centers ◽  
Survey Period ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Purpose:The role of health-system pharmacists continues to expand, and this area of pharmacy practice increasingly requires augmented baseline training. It is unclear how Post Graduate Year 1 (PGY-1) pharmacy residencies may be changing to meet these needs.The objectives of our survey were to describe PGY-1 pharmacy residency program design among academic medical centers, characterize program changes enacted over 5-year period, and describe career paths among PGY-1 pharmacy residency graduates. Methods: A 32-item questionnaire was developed independently, which was reviewed and validated by 4 residency program directors. The survey was uploaded to an online survey tool and sent electronically to residency program directors of 109 Vizient academic medical centers with PGY-1 pharmacy residency programs. Residency program directors were identified from a list of Vizient-participating hospitals. The survey was re-sent at 2-week intervals on 4 occasions to improve response rates. SPSS version 23.0 was used to analyze the data. Results: Overall, 49 (45%) of hospitals responded to the survey. Survey responses showed statistically significant increases over the 5-year survey period in the following areas: the number of PGY-1 resident positions offered ( P = .001), percent of time spent on teaching experiences ( P = .001), and percentage of PGY-1 residents pursuing PGY-2 or fellowship training ( P = .026). Conclusion: We found that PGY-1 pharmacy residency programs at Vizient academic medical centers have undergone limited changes over the 5-year survey period and substantial variation exists between program designs. The most common change to program design was an increase in the percentage of time residents spend on teaching experiences. There was an increase in residents pursuing PGY-2 or fellowship training, which may suggest a shift toward increased specialization in clinical pharmacy practice or may reflect changes in the availability of job opportunities.

Unplanned Reoperation and Implant Revision After Total Wrist Arthroplasty

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894471989881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor M. Pong ◽  
Wouter F. van Leeuwen ◽  
Kamil Oflazoglu ◽  
Philip E. Blazar ◽  
Neal Chen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Academic Medical Centers ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Total Wrist Arthroplasty ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Wrist Arthroplasty

Background: Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is a treatment option for many debilitating wrist conditions. With recent improvements in implant design, indications for TWA have broadened. However, despite these improvements, there are still complications associated with TWA, such as unplanned reoperation and eventual implant removal. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for an unplanned reoperation or implant revision after a TWA at 2 academic medical centers between 2002 and 2015. Methods: In this retrospective study, 24 consecutive TWAs were identified using CPT codes. Medical records were manually reviewed to identify demographic, patient- or disease-related, and surgery-related risk factors for reoperation and implant removal after a primary TWA. Results: Forty-six percent of wrists (11 of 24 TWAs performed) had a reoperation after a median of 3.4 years, while 29% (7 of 24) underwent implant revision after a median of 5 years. Two patients had wrist surgery prior to their TWA, both eventually had their implant removed ( P = .08). There were no risk factors associated with reoperation or implant removal. Conclusion: Unplanned reoperation and implant removal after a primary TWA are common. Approximately 1 in 3 wrists are likely to undergo revision surgery. We found no factors associated with reoperation or implant removal; however, prior wrist surgery showed a trend toward risk of implant removal after TWA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document