medical directors
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

308
(FIVE YEARS 59)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Ankita Agarwal ◽  
Sulaiman Alshakhs ◽  
Elizabeth Luth ◽  
Ritchell Dignam ◽  
Manney C. Reid ◽  
...  

Background: Hospice medical directors (HMDs) play an important role as part of the interdisciplinary hospice team. Family caregivers (CGs) play a critical role in caring for patients receiving home hospice care. Understanding the challenges HMDs face when working with CGs is important when addressing potential gaps in care and providing quality end of life (EoL) care for the patient/CG dyad. Objectives: To understand issues HMDs encounter when working with and caring for CGs and to determine how they manage these issues in the home hospice setting. Design: Twelve semistructured phone interviews with certified HMDs were conducted. Data were analyzed using standard qualitative methods. Subjects: Participants included certified HMDs obtained from a public website. Results: Participants’ responses regarding the major issues HMDs faced when working with CGs were categorized into 6 themes: (1) assessing CG competency, (2) CG financial burden, (3) physical burden of caregiving, (4) managing CG expectations, (5) CGs denial of patient’s terminal condition, and (6) CGs unwilling or unable to engage with providers about their needs or the patient’s needs. Conclusions: HMDs confirmed the important role CGs play in providing care to home hospice patients. Challenges faced by HMDs vary from assessing CG competency in providing care to the patient, dealing with the physical and financial toll that CGs face, and addressing CGs’ expectations of hospice care. Future studies are needed to explore solutions to these issues to better support CGs in the home setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Ferry ◽  
Andrew Chang ◽  
Rami P. Dibbs ◽  
Edward M. Reece ◽  
Joshua Vorstenbosch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e001192
Author(s):  
James N Robinson ◽  
Mark Alan Fontana ◽  
Jordan D Metzl ◽  
Sameer Dixit ◽  
Stephanie A Kliethermes ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo survey runners and triathletes about their willingness to resume in-person racing during the COVID-19 pandemic, health concerns related to mass races and changes in running patterns since the start of the pandemic.DesignAn electronic survey was distributed from 15 July to 1 September 2020 to runners and triathletes by New York Road Runners, ASICS North America, and race medical directors, and through social media.ParticipantsRunners and triathletes 18 years of age or older who participated in at least one race in 2019.ResultsA total of 2278 surveys were received. Not all participants answered every question; the denominator represents the number of responses to each question. Most participants were from the USA (1620/1940, 83.5%), of which over half were from New York (812/1475, 55.1%). Regarding when respondents would feel comfortable returning to in-person racing, the most frequent response was ‘Whenever local laws allow, but only if there are sufficient precautions’ (954/2173, 43.9%), followed by ‘Not until there is a vaccine’ (540/2173, 24.9%). The most common concerns about in-person races were crowded starting corrals (1802/2084, 86.5%), the number of COVID-19 cases in the race location (1585/2084, 76.1%) and the number of participants (1517/2084, 72.8%). Comparing running patterns before the pandemic to Summer 2020, the mean weekly mileage decreased from 25.5 (SD 15.4) miles to 22.7 (16.2) miles (p<0.001).ConclusionMost runners are willing to return to racing when local laws allow, though as of Summer 2020, many desired certain precautions to feel comfortable.


Author(s):  
Stéphane Sanchez ◽  
Fiona Ecarnot ◽  
Dimitri Voilmy ◽  
Biné Mariam Ndiongue ◽  
Clément Cormi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Nursing homes (NHs) are an ideal environment in which to implement interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate prescriptions. Quality indicators (QIs) may be useful to standardize practices, but it is unclear how they mediate change. In the framework of a quantitative study aimed at reducing the prescription of anticholinergic drugs among NH residents using QIs, we performed a qualitative study to describe the investigators’ perception of the utility of QIs. Methods Qualitative study using focus group methodology. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed, and analyzed by thematic analysis. Participants were purposefully recruited from among the medical directors of the NHs in the quantitative study. Results Five medical directors participated in two focus group meetings. The main themes to emerge were: (1) communication is key to introducing new practices and achieving lasting uptake; (2) improved coordination and communication provided useful information to help interpret the quantitative results observed: e.g., participants reported that they were able to obtain contextual and patient-specific information that explained why some prescribers had consistently, but justifiably “poor” performance on the quantitative indicators; (3) negative aspects reported included reluctance to change among prescribers and the tendency to shirk responsibility. Conclusion From the point of view of medical directors of NHs participating in an interventional program to reduce inappropriate prescriptions of anticholinergic drugs, the main factor driving the success of the program was communication, which is key to achieving adherence. Improved communication provides useful insights into the reasons why no quantitative reduction is observed in objective quality indicators.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 329-329
Author(s):  
Abhijit Sanyal ◽  
Joanna M. Hamilton ◽  
Ariel Martin ◽  
Victoria H. Selesnick ◽  
Matthew Rice ◽  
...  

329 Background: Cancer patients in the last year of life may have different clinical needs and evolving goals of care. Helping clinicians consistently identify such patients in a systematic and prospective fashion, at a discrete moment in the care trajectory, is an important step towards optimizing the care of these patients. Methods: Physician medical directors for each clinical pathway at our institution were tasked with identifying nodes within their respective treatment pathways associated with poor prognosis, specifically a median overall survival of < 12 months. This information was embedded into the underlying data model of the pathways platform, allowing us to determine how often clinicians navigated through poor prognosis nodes. Results: Pathways medical directors identified 44 nodes associated with poor prognosis. Some of these nodes encompassed a broader set of patients (metastatic pancreatic cancer, any line), whereas others were more specific (metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell histology, second line or beyond). For the period 3/11/20 – 5/31/21, clinicians navigated in the platform for 11,057 unique patients. Of these, 1,234 (11.1%) unique patients were associated with poor prognosis nodes. Such navigations were much more common in patients with solid tumors (table). Conclusions: A well-maintained clinical pathways program can be a mechanism for defining clinical settings associated with poor prognosis and for routinely identifying patients in these settings. By embedding this into the pathways data model, we can provide physicians with important reminders and resources related to goals of care conversations, supportive care resources, and appropriate treatment options and clinical trials.[Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Raetz ◽  
Elliot Ross ◽  
Brittany Dickerson ◽  
Benjamin Walrath

ABSTRACT Introduction Medical direction has been the cornerstone to safe and effective prehospital and enroute care since the establishment of emergency medical services (EMS). Medical oversight by a physician has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in both settings. When the Navy Regional Office of the EMS Medical Director was established in 2016, it brought additional resources, including the addition of a paramedic and nurse EMS analyst and recruitment of additional local medical directors (LMDs). This, combined with the engagement of military leadership, allowed for expansion and improvement of medical direction in our prehospital and enroute care system and the establishment of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) program. Materials and Methods In 2017, a database was created to collect total run volume, acuity of calls, number of certain time-sensitive conditions, and CQI performance. A retrospective review of this database was conducted. This project was deemed institutional review board exempt. Results LMD reports that submission went from 17% for 2017 to 64% for 2018, 91% for 2019, and 79% for 2020. In 2019, 67% of the sites had verifiable CQI programs and, in 2020, this improved to 80% of sites. The review also revealed insight into levels of acuity seen by prehospital and enroute care providers. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that improvement in medical oversight in a large regional prehospital system can be achieved through persistence and engagement of nonmedical leadership.


Author(s):  
Alexander Bedenkov ◽  
Viraj Rajadhyaksha ◽  
Carmen Moreno ◽  
Susana Goncalves ◽  
Pei-Chieh Fong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Peter Hilbert-Carius ◽  
Manuel F. Struck ◽  
Marcus Rudolph ◽  
Jürgen Knapp ◽  
Leif Rognås ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The extent to which Point-of-care of ultrasound (POCUS) is used in different European helicopter EMS (HEMS) is unknown. We aimed to study the availability, perception, and future aspects of POCUS in the European HEMS using an online survey. Method A survey about the use of POCUS in HEMS was conducted by a multinational steering expert committee and was carried out from November 30, 2020 to December 30, 2020 via an online web portal. Invitations for participation were sent via email to the medical directors of the European HEMS organizations including two reminding notes. Results During the study period, 69 participants from 25 countries and 41 different HEMS providers took part in the survey. 96% (n = 66) completed the survey. POCUS was available in 75% (56% always when needed and 19% occasionally) of the responding HEMS organizations. 17% were planning to establish POCUS in the near future. Responders who provided POCUS used it in approximately 15% of the patients. Participants thought that POCUS is important in both trauma and non-trauma-patients (73%, n = 46). The extended focused assessment sonography for trauma (eFAST) protocol (77%) was the most common protocol used. A POCUS credentialing process including documented examinations was requested in less than one third of the HEMS organizations. Conclusions The majority of the HEMS organizations in Europe are able to provide different POCUS protocols in their services. The most used POCUS protocols were eFAST, FATE and RUSH. Despite the enthusiasm for POCUS, comprehensive training and clear credentialing processes are not available in about two thirds of the European HEMS organizations. Due to several limitations of this survey further studies are needed to evaluate POCUS in HEMS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. A16.3-A17
Author(s):  
David Fish ◽  
Fiona Bell ◽  
Clare O’Connell ◽  
Alison Walker ◽  
Laura Evans ◽  
...  

BackgroundStudies have found that pre-hospital and emergency department (ED) analgesia for children is sub-optimal. In the pre-hospital setting, barriers include limited parenteral routes, education or clinical experience and practice legislation restricting the use of opioids by paramedics. Ketamine is safe and effective with multiple administration routes. It is not bound by the controlled drugs limitations in the pre-hospital setting, and is familiar to pre-hospital and ED practitioners.MethodsQuestionnaires were sent to all UK Ambulance Service Medical Directors and Paediatric Major Trauma Centres to establish current use of parenteral analgesics, and acceptability of alternatives in pre-hospital care such as ketamine. Descriptive analysis was undertaken.ResultsIntranasal opiates were the first line parenteral analgesics in injured children in all EDs. Frequent shortages of IN diamorphine resulted in more variability of second line choices, with 40% opting for another opioid. 96% of EDs would support the use of ketamine by pre-hospital clinicians, although concerns regarding inappropriate (IV) use and use by technician crews were raised. Most ED clinicians were unaware of the limited analgesic choices available to paramedics, with many suggesting alternative opiates as well as ketamine.All ambulance service directors recognised the need for alternative analgesics being made available. Without legislative changes, inhaled/IN agents or oral opiates were the only current options. All services were supportive of research to explore the use of ketamine by paramedics for injured children.ConclusionsThere is support for the addition of IN ketamine into paramedics’ repertoire of analgesics and recognition of potential benefit. However, there is a lack of experience and evidence around its use, thus warranting research to consider the impact on analgesic timeliness, adequacy and effectiveness. An analgesia ‘system of care’ which integrates pre- and in-hospital practice would be facilitated by the use of medicines effective in managing pain and familiar to practitioners in both settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document