scholarly journals An unexpected case of Bartonella alsatica prosthetic vascular graft infection

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 2453-2456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Puges ◽  
Armelle Ménard ◽  
Xavier Berard ◽  
Magalie Geneviève ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Pinaquy ◽  
...  
VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-284
Author(s):  
Atıf Yolgosteren ◽  
Gencehan Kumtepe ◽  
Melda Payaslioglu ◽  
Cuneyt Ozakin

Summary. Background: Prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) is a complication with high mortality. Cyanoacrylate (CA) is an adhesive which has been used in a number of surgical procedures. In this in-vivo study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between PVGI and CA. Materials and methods: Thirty-two rats were equally divided into four groups. Pouch was formed on back of rats until deep fascia. In group 1, vascular graft with polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) was placed into pouch. In group 2, MRSA strain with a density of 1 ml 0.5 MacFarland was injected into pouch. In group 3, 1 cm 2 vascular graft with PET piece was placed into pouch and MRSA strain with a density of 1 ml 0.5 MacFarland was injected. In group 4, 1 cm 2 vascular graft with PET piece impregnated with N-butyl cyanoacrylate-based adhesive was placed and MRSA strain with a density of 1 ml 0.5 MacFarland was injected. All rats were scarified in 96th hour, culture samples were taken where intervention was performed and were evaluated microbiologically. Bacteria reproducing in each group were numerically evaluated based on colony-forming unit (CFU/ml) and compared by taking their average. Results: MRSA reproduction of 0 CFU/ml in group 1, of 1410 CFU/ml in group 2, of 180 200 CFU/ml in group 3 and of 625 300 CFU/ml in group 4 was present. A statistically significant difference was present between group 1 and group 4 (p < 0.01), between group 2 and group 4 (p < 0.01), between group 3 and group 4 (p < 0.05). In terms of reproduction, no statistically significant difference was found in group 1, group 2, group 3 in themselves. Conclusions: We observed that the rate of infection increased in the cyanoacyrylate group where cyanoacrylate was used. We think that surgeon should be more careful in using CA in vascular surgery.


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene G. Tronco ◽  
Charito Love ◽  
Josephine N. Rini ◽  
Alice K. Yu ◽  
Kuldeep K. Bhargava ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Legout ◽  
Piervito D’Elia ◽  
Beatrice Sarraz-Bournet ◽  
Nicolas Ettahar ◽  
Stephan Haulon ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S630-S630
Author(s):  
Armelle Pasquet ◽  
Olivier Robineau ◽  
Michel Valette ◽  
Pier-Vito D’Elia ◽  
Sylvie Vandamme ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 876-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Puges ◽  
Xavier Bérard ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Ruiz ◽  
Frederic Debordeaux ◽  
Arnaud Desclaux ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Elens ◽  
Muzhakkir Dusoruth ◽  
Parla Astarci ◽  
Stefano Mastrobuoni ◽  
Michel J. Bosiers ◽  
...  

Background: Prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) remains a severe and challenging complication in vascular surgery with high morbidity and mortality rates. Incidence has been reported between 1% and 6%. The aim of this study was to report our experience in terms of general and surgical management as well as outcome, over 15 years. Methods: A retrospective consecutive study was conducted of all patients treated in our department for PVGI between January 2000 and December 2015. We analyzed all data relative to primary operation, duration interval between initial surgery and infections signs, infection site, type of microorganism involved, and surgical treatment modality, as well as evaluation of short- and long-term results. Results: Sixty-two patients were admitted for PVGI. Primary revascularization procedures consisted of a peripheral bypass in 42 (68%) patients and an aortic bypass in the remaining 20 (32%) patients. Median interval between primary procedure and reintervention was 3 months (interquartile range 17 [IQR 17]) in the peripheral group and 48 months (IQR 70.5) in the aortic group. Complete excision of the prosthetic graft was carried out in 85% of the cases. Thirty-day mortality was 0% and 9.5% in the aortic and peripheral group, respectively. The overall survival rate was 62.3% at 2-years, 46.4% in the aortic group, and 69.7% in the peripheral group. Conclusions: Prosthetic vascular graft infection needs a multidisciplinary management with appropriate antibiotherapy, radical removal of the infected graft, and in situ reconstruction. This strategy gives satisfactory results in terms of mortality, morbidity, patency rates, and infection control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document