scholarly journals Comparative Study between Total Mesocolic Exesion Versus Conventional Right Hemicolectomy in management of Tumors of the Right Colon

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
A.A. Yousef ◽  
M.M. Mohamed ◽  
A.M. Zidan ◽  
A.M. Abostate
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
The Right

scholarly journals Synchronous robotic right hemicolectomy and subtotal gastrectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 1273-1277
Author(s):  
Fabio Carbone ◽  
Ugo Pace ◽  
Vittorio Albino ◽  
Maddalena Leongito ◽  
Paolo Delrio
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Minimal Invasive Surgery ◽  
Subtotal Gastrectomy ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Minimal Invasiveness ◽  
Synchronous Colorectal Cancer ◽  
The Right ◽  
Robotic Resection

AbstractAbout 4% of patients with stomach cancer diagnosis have synchronous colorectal cancer and some of these patients may require a synchronous surgical resection. So far, only few minimally invasive series of synchronous resections have been described. We investigated the feasibility and safety of the synchronous robotic resection of the right colon and stomach malignancies, trying to identify a standardised and reproducible technique. It is essential to carefully plan the operation and the trocars positioning to minimise the number of robotic dockings and be able to operate comfortably. Herein, we describe our approach, which is safe and effective in terms of minimal invasiveness and oncological radicality. Robotic surgery could be used with even more advantage in complex multi-organ resections, providing the surgeon with a better vision, a more accurate dissection and longer instruments, to offer the patient all the benefits of a minimal invasive surgery.

Is Laparoscopic CME Right Hemicolectomy an Optimal Indication for NET of the Right Colon and Terminal Ileum?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Pedrazzani ◽  
C. Conti ◽  
A. Valdegamberi ◽  
M. V. Davì ◽  
S. Cingarlini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Terminal Ileum ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
The Right

Multicenter Controlled Study of Intracorporeal Mechanical Side-to-Side Isoperistaltic Anastomosis versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: HEMI-D-TREND-Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Serra-Aracil ◽  
Mireia Pascua-Solé ◽  
Laura Mora-López ◽  
Helena Vallverdú ◽  
Anna Serracant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Western World ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Trend Study ◽  
Right Colon Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Extracorporeal Anastomosis ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laparoscopic Anastomosis

Colorectal cancer is the second most frequent cancer in the Western world. A third of colorectal tumors are located in the right colon, and right hemicolectomy is the treatment in nondisseminated right colon cancer. The most serious complication of this procedure is anastomotic leak, which occurs in 8.4% of cases. At present, there is no standardized technique for laparoscopic ileo-colic anastomosis. In previous observational studies, intracorporeal side-to-side ileo-colic laparoscopic anastomosis has shown better results than extracorporeal anastomosis in terms of morbidity and mortality. It is known that randomized studies provide higher levels of evidence, but multicenter randomized controlled studies may imply a learning curve bias due to the differences in technical experience acquired at each hospital. As a result, we propose to carry out a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized TREND-study design (Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs-TREND) in a large sample of 416 patients (208 per group) in order to assess the use of intracorporeal side-to-side ileo-colic laparoscopic anastomosis as the gold standard in right hemicolectomy.

scholarly journals Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Liu ◽  
Wei-hong Yang ◽  
Zhou-guang Jiao ◽  
Ji-fu Zhang ◽  
Rui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Right Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (SILS) has long used in surgery for a long time. However, there is barely a systemic review related to the comparison between the SILS and the conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (CLS) for the right colon cancer in the long term follow-up. Herein, we used the most recent articles to compare these two techniques by meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Wanfang databases to compare SILS with CLS for right colon cancer up to May 2019. The operative, postoperative, pathological and mid-term follow-up outcomes of nine studies were extracted and compared. Results A total of 1356 patients participated in 9 studies, while 653 patients were assigned to the SILS group and 703 patients were assigned to the CLS group. The patients’ baselines in the SILS group were consistent with those in the CLS group. Compared to the CLS group, the SILS group had a shorter operation duration (SMD − 23.49, 95%CI − 36.71 to − 10.27, P < 0.001, chi-square = 24.11), shorter hospital stay (SMD − 0.76, 95% `CI − 1.07 to − 0.45, P < 0.001, chi-square = 9.85), less blood loss (SMD − 8.46, 95% CI − 14.59 to − 2.34; P < 0.05; chi-square = 2.26), smaller incision length (SMD − 1.60, 95% CI − 2.66 to − 0.55, P < 0.001; chi-square = 280.44), more lymph node harvested (SMD − 0.98, 95% CI − 1.79 to − 0.16, P < 0.05; chi-square = 4.61), and a longer proximal surgical edge (SMD − 0.51, 95% CI − 0.93 to − 0.09, P < 0.05; chi-square = 2.42). No significant difference was found in other indexes. After we removed a single large study, we performed another meta-analysis again. The operation duration in the SILS group was still better than that in the CLS group. Conclusion SILS could be a faster and more reliable approach than CLS for the right colon cancer and could accelerate patient recovery, especially for patients with a low BMI.

scholarly journals Colonic Diaphragm Disease in a Patient Receiving Long Term Diclofenac Therapy

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 413-416
Author(s):  
Alan A Weiss ◽  
David A Owen
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Barium Enema Examination ◽  
Inflammatory Agent ◽  
The Right ◽  
Mucosal Folds

A 65-year-old woman who had been taking diclofenac for five years developed cramping central abdominal pain. Barium enema examination was negative, but colonoscopy revealed prominent mucosal folds in the right colon with areas of ulceration. Because of continued symptoms, a right hemicolectomy was performed, which showed four separate short segment strictures or diaphragms. This case demonstrates a rare complication of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent therapy that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained abdominal pain.

Correlation of Metabolic Risk Factors with Sessile Serrated Lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-179
Author(s):  
Melania Macarie ◽  
Simona Bataga ◽  
Simona Mocan ◽  
Monica Pantea ◽  
Razvan Opaschi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Interval Cancer ◽  
Metabolic Risk Factors ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Metabolic Risk ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Serrated Lesions ◽  
The Right

Background and Aims: The importance of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) in the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma has been recently established. These are supposed to cause the so-called “interval cancer”, having a rapidly progressive growth and being difficult to detect and to obtain an endoscopic complete resection. We aimed to establish the most important metabolic risk factors for sessile serrated lesions. Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study, on a series of 2918 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy in Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, County Clinical Emergency Hospital, Târgu-Mureș, Romania between 1 st of January 2015-31 th of December 2017. In order to evaluate the metabolic risk factors for polyps’ development, enrolled participants were stratified in two groups, a study group, 33 patients with SSLs lesions, and a control group, 138 patients with adenomatous polyps, selected by systematic sampling for age and anatomical site. Independent variables investigated were: gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, arterial hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperuricemia, nonalcoholic liver disease. Results: For SSLs the most common encountered localization was the right colon in 30.55% of cases. By comparative bivariate analysis between SSLs group and control group, it was observed that hypertension (p=0.03, OR 2.33, 95 %CI 1.03-5.24), obesity (p=0.03, OR 2.61, 95 %CI 1.08-6.30), hyperuricemia (p=0.04, OR 2.72, 95 %CI 1.28-7.55), high cholesterol (p=0.002, OR 3.42; 95 %CI 1.48-7.87), and high triglycerides level (p=0.0006, OR 5.75; 95 %CI 1.92-17.2) were statistically associated with SSLs development. By multivariate analysis hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia retained statistical significance. Conclusions: Our study showed that the highest prevalence of SSLs was in the right colon and hypertension and increased triglycerides levels were associated with the risk of SSLs development. These risk factors are easy to detect in clinical practice and may help identifying groups with high risk for colorectal cancer, where screening is recommended.

scholarly journals Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keshu Shan ◽  
Hongpeng Lu ◽  
Zhixin Zhang ◽  
Jiarong Xie ◽  
Lu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lesion Detection ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Advanced Lesion ◽  
The Right

Abstract Objectives Colorectal cancer on the right side of the colon has been suggested to be harder to detect by colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a second forward-view examination of the right side of the colon could increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and/or polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a single-centre randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing colonoscopy were recruited and randomly assigned to the second forward-view examination (SFE) group, in which the right side of the colon was examined twice or the traditional colonoscopy (TC) group in which the colonoscopy was performed in a standard manner. The primary outcome was the ADR of right colon. The overall PDR and ADR, PDR of the right colon, per-adenoma miss rate of the right colon, and advanced lesion detection rate were also recorded and compared. Results A total of 392 patients were included in the study (SFE group 197 vs. TC group 195). The ADR and PDR of the right colon in the SFE group were significantly higher than those in the TC group (ADR 10.7% vs. 5.1%; P = 0.042); PDR 17.8% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.021). No significant difference was found in overall PDR/ADR, or advanced lesion detection rate between the two groups. Conclusions This prospective controlled study revealed that a second forward-view examination could modestly increase the ADR and PDR of the right colon during unsedated colonoscopies. This simple, safe and time-effective technique might be recommended for routine unsedated colonoscopy. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT03619122. Registered on 7/8/2018.

scholarly journals Sessile serrated adenoma invading a diverticulum in the right colon: tips and tricks for a safe complete endoscopic resection

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Geyl ◽  
Jérémie Albouys ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
Hugo Lepetit ◽  
Martin Dahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Tips And Tricks ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Sessile Serrated Adenoma ◽  
Serrated Adenoma ◽  
The Right

scholarly journals Racial Disparities in Epigenetic Aging of the Right vs Left Colon

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Devall ◽  
Xiangqing Sun ◽  
Fangcheng Yuan ◽  
Gregory S Cooper ◽  
Joseph Willis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Left Colon ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Normal Colon ◽  
Epigenetic Aging ◽  
Epigenetic Age Acceleration ◽  
The Right

Abstract There are well-documented racial differences in age-of-onset and laterality of colorectal cancer. Epigenetic age acceleration is postulated to be an underlying factor. However, comparative studies of side-specific colonic tissue epigenetic aging are lacking. Here, we performed DNA methylation analysis of matched right and left biopsies of normal colon from 128 individuals. Among African Americans (n = 88), the right colon showed accelerated epigenetic aging as compared to individual-matched left colon (1.51 years; 95% CI = 0.62 to 2.40 years; two-sided P = .001). In contrast, among European Americans (n = 40), the right colon shows remarkable age deceleration (1.93 years; 95% CI = 0.65 to 3.21 years; two-sided P = .004). Further, epigenome-wide analysis of DNA methylation identifies a unique pattern of hypermethylation in African American right colon. Our study is the first to report such race and side-specific differences in epigenetic aging of normal colon, providing novel insight into the observed younger age-of-onset and relative preponderance of right-side colon neoplasia in African Americans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document