scholarly journals Livermore Computing Integrates Advanced Cognitive Simulation Resource

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Karlin ◽  
A Bertsch
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Simulation

scholarly journals Is Disaggregation possible for HPC Cognitive Simulation?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Wyatt ◽  
Valen Yamamoto ◽  
Zoe Tosi ◽  
Ian Karlin ◽  
Brian Van Essen
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Simulation

Role of cognitive simulation in healthcare

2015 ◽  
pp. 424-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usha Satish ◽  
Satish Krishnamurthy ◽  
Mantosh Dewan
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Simulation

scholarly journals Cognitive simulation of incident risks in the structure of loading and transport enterprise

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 012027
Author(s):  
S V Shishkina ◽  
Yu D Pristupa ◽  
L D Pavlova ◽  
V N Fryanov
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Simulation

Cognitive simulation as a tool for cognitive task analysis

Ergonomics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1163-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
EMILIE M. ROTH ◽  
DAVID D. WOODS ◽  
HARRY E. POPLE
Keyword(s):  
Task Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Cognitive Task Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Simulation

Closing the Loops Without Human Subjects: A Survey of Control Approaches in Simulation of Human-Artifact Interaction

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm “Wilfred” F. van der Vegte ◽  
Imre Horva´th
Keyword(s):  
Closed Loop ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Product Model ◽  
Embedded Control ◽  
Loop Control ◽  
Control Loops ◽  
Human Control ◽  
Cognitive Simulation ◽  
Human Models ◽  
Interaction Simulation

To include interactions with human users in simulations of the use of products, the most common approach is to couple human subjects to the behavioral product model in the simulation loop using interfaces based on VR and haptics. Replacing human subjects by human models with simulation capabilities could offer a cost-saving alternative. Currently available human models have not yet been deployed this way. This paper explores the possibilities to achieve mutual closed-loop coupling between human models and artifact models for enabling fully software-based interaction simulations. We have not only investigated human control in simulations, but also solutions to include embedded control in artifacts. The paper critically reviews existing (partial) solutions to simulate or execute control behaviors, and to close the control loops we identified in human-artifact interaction simulation. We concluded that closed-loop control of interaction simulations can be achieved by selectively combining existing partial solutions. Inclusion of decision-making appears to be the biggest challenge. Promising solutions are (i) cognitive simulation and (ii) execution of conjectured interactions specified as logical instructions, typically in the form of scenarios. Based on scenarios, which we expect to be more intuitive for designers, a new approach is now being developed.

Risk Analysis of Ship Navigation by Use of Cognitive Simulation

2001 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Itoh ◽  
T. Yamaguchi ◽  
J. P. Hansen ◽  
F. R. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Simulation ◽  
Ship Navigation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document