Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapies Adversely Affect Fertility in Men- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 959-974
Author(s):  
Antara Banerjee ◽  
Marco Scarpa ◽  
Surajit Pathak ◽  
Patrizia Burra ◽  
Giacomo C. Sturniolo ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Sexual functions are sometimes adversely affected by the therapeutic drugs delivered for treating IBD. Much attention has been focused on pregnancy/sexual issues in women. Relatively less attention has been poured in to address this issue in men. This systematic review assesses the drugs having potential detrimental effects on fertility in men. Methods: Three databases were searched by two researchers independently for potentially relevant publications between 1964 to 2015 and 249 papers were retrieved. Studies that dealt with sexual problems after IBD drugs administration were included in the purview of this review. Results: Fourteen studies with 327 human patients and 110 animals were analysed. Sulphasalazine treated patients had lower spermatozoa count, lower sperm motility and higher risk of oligospermia compared to mesalazine treated ones. Biologics seem to be safe to use while attempting to conceive however, proper clinical studies reporting male fertility problems in IBD patients are lacking. Azathioprine caused oligospermia but a meta-analytical approach was not possible due to heterogeneity in studies. Some animal studies showed methotrexate affects abnormal testis structure and spermatogenesis. Conclusion: This study summarises the current literature and safety issues affecting fertility parameters in men and animals treated with IBD therapeutic drugs, which can further assist clinicians in better management of adult male IBD patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-357
Author(s):  
Jalpa Patel ◽  
Dina Fakhouri ◽  
Mohamed Noureldin ◽  
Iris Kovar-Gough ◽  
Francis A. Farraye ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Hayashida ◽  
Ryosuke Takegawa ◽  
Muhammad Shoaib ◽  
Tomoaki Aoki ◽  
Rishabh C. Choudhary ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mitochondria are essential organelles that provide energy for cellular functions, participate in cellular signaling and growth, and facilitate cell death. Based on their multifactorial roles, mitochondria are also critical in the progression of critical illnesses. Transplantation of mitochondria has been reported as a potential promising approach to treat critical illnesses, particularly ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). However, a systematic review of the relevant literature has not been conducted to date. Here, we systematically reviewed the animal and human studies relevant to IRI to summarize the evidence for mitochondrial transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and Embase and performed a systematic review of mitochondrial transplantation for IRI in both preclinical and clinical studies. We developed a search strategy using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Heading/Emtree terms. Studies including cell-mediated transfer of mitochondria as a transfer method were excluded. Data were extracted to a tailored template, and data synthesis was descriptive because the data were not suitable for meta-analysis. Results Overall, we identified 20 animal studies and two human studies. Among animal studies, 14 (70%) studies focused on either brain or heart IRI. Both autograft and allograft mitochondrial transplantation were used in 17 (85%) animal studies. The designs of the animal studies were heterogeneous in terms of the route of administration, timing of transplantation, and dosage used. Twelve (60%) studies were performed in a blinded manner. All animal studies reported that mitochondrial transplantation markedly mitigated IRI in the target tissues, but there was variation in biological biomarkers and pathological changes. The human studies were conducted with a single-arm, unblinded design, in which autologous mitochondrial transplantation was applied to pediatric patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for IRI–associated myocardial dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Conclusion The evidence gathered from our systematic review supports the potential beneficial effects of mitochondrial transplantation after IRI, but its clinical translation remains limited. Further investigations are thus required to explore the mechanisms of action and patient outcomes in critical settings after mitochondrial transplantation. Systematic review registration The study was registered at UMIN under the registration number UMIN000043347.


2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-371
Author(s):  
Ramprasad Jegadeesan ◽  
Madhav Desai ◽  
Tharani Sundararajan ◽  
Venkata Subhash Gorrepati ◽  
Viveksandeep Thogulva Chandrasekar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. 201-202
Author(s):  
C Zhang ◽  
G Byrne ◽  
T Lee ◽  
J Singer ◽  
D Giustini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. e36-e37
Author(s):  
J.A.M. Sleutjes ◽  
E. Boersma ◽  
C.J. Van Der Woude ◽  
A.C. De Vries ◽  
J. E. Roeters Van Lennep

Author(s):  
Sailish Honap ◽  
Susanna Meade ◽  
Hajir Ibraheim ◽  
Peter M. Irving ◽  
Michael P. Jones ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document