scholarly journals Retraction Note: Measurement and Analysis of Logistics Energy Efficiency in China from Perspective of Total Factor Productivity

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1109-1109
Author(s):  
Zhang Li-Guo

RETRACTION The Publisher and Editor have retracted this article [1] in accordance with good ethical practices. After a thorough investigations we believe that the peer review process was compromised. The article was published on-line on 31-12-2014.

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 322-322
Author(s):  
Deng Yonghe

The Publisher and Editor have retracted this article [1] in accordance with good ethical practices. After a thorough investigations we believe that the peer review process was compromised. The article was published on-line on


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-161
Author(s):  
Minshen Huang ◽  
Lihua Zhang ◽  
Shudong Wei ◽  
Qi Zeng ◽  
Haichao Zhou ◽  
...  

RETRACTION The Publisher and Editor have retracted this article [1] in accordance with good ethical practices. After a thorough investigations we believe that the peer review process was compromised. The article was published on-line on 22-10-2015. REFERENCE [1] M. Huang, L. Zhang, S. Wei, Q. Zeng, H. Zhou and Y. Lin, “Seasonal variation of tannin and nutrient in aegiceras corniculatum leaves in zhangjiang mangrove ecosystem”, The Open Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 9, pp. 143-148, 2015.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1110-1110
Author(s):  
Liu Fei ◽  
Zhang Dongliang

RETRACTION The Publisher and Editor have retracted this article [1] in accordance with good ethical practices. After a thorough investigations we believe that the peer review process was compromised. The article was published on-line on 26-06-2015.


2019 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 02055
Author(s):  
Lasse Rohde ◽  
Tine Steen Larsen ◽  
Rasmus Lund Jensen ◽  
Kim Trangbæk Jønsson ◽  
Evangelina Loukou

This article is an accidental publication. It was accepted by the Guest Editors in charge of the peer-review process without the authors' final consent. The Guest Editors have given their approval for this decision.


KIMIKA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Florecita De Guzman

Warmest welcome to our dear colleagues!We reintroduce you to KIMIKA, the Philippine journal for the chemical sciences. KIMIKA has taken a new look, and has reworked its focus to better reflect the research, industrial and academic efforts of chemistry practitioners in the country. We have expanded KIMIKA’s scope to include papers dealing with primary research results, scientific reviews, rapid communications, innovations in teaching, technical commentaries, instructional materials, novel laboratory experiments, industry trends, and policy papers. In succeeding issues, we also plan to have a section that features outstanding undergraduate research efforts.KIMIKA is now published by the Philippine Federation of Chemical Societies, and we hope that our expanded coverage will draw a wider base of readers and contributors of publishable material. To save printing costs and better manage our financial limitations, we have done away with paper copies and have adopted the open source, on-line format. A happy consequence of this is that submissions can be emailed anytime. Papers received will be subjected to peer review, and if accepted, will be copy-edited and uploaded immediately for on-line publication.We invite you to publish your work in KIMIKA. Rest assured that all papers published in KIMIKA are subjected to a peer review process that ensures the quality of published work.May we also take this opportunity to invite you to our workshop on scientific writing during the 28th Philippine Chemistry Congress in 2013?


2019 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 02077
Author(s):  
◽  
S.I Tanabe ◽  
H. Zhang ◽  
J. Kurnitski ◽  
M.C. Gameiro da Silva ◽  
...  

This article is an accidental publication. It was accepted by the Guest Editors in charge of the peer-review process without the authors' final consent. The Guest Editors have given their approval for this decision.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Li-Guo

Based on data envelopment analysis model (DEA), this paper constructs a measure function of logistics energy efficiency. Using provincial panel data from 2003 to 2009, it measures logistics energy efficiency in China from perspective of total factor productivity and analyzes the dynamic changes and regional disparity of logistics energy efficiency. The results show that, (1) the average growth rate of energy consume of China logistics is 13.8%, and the output value of that is only 5.7%;(2) The highest efficiency province is Hebei and the lowest is Yunnan which is only 0.3547. (3) The logistics energy efficiency of China in three regions was found while the East is best which 0.815 is, and the West is the worst which is 0.472.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (27) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jovan Shopovski ◽  
Robert W. McGee ◽  
Daniel B. Hier

Despite its weaknesses, peer review is our best gatekeeper of rigorous science. With the advent of on-line and open-access publishing, a vigorous debate has ensued over the timeliness of peer review. Many of us remember, and some still face, long peer review and publishing timeframes. Ware and Mabe (2015) estimated that a reviewer needs from several hours to a day to carefully prepare a peer review. Even so, the time from submission to first decision varies from 8 weeks to 18 weeks and varies by academic discipline and journal. Although the slowness of the peer review process has been critiqued (Lotriet, 2012), long ingrained processes have been slow to change. The development of the open access publishing has brought to the forefront the need to speed the peer review process and reduce the time to publication. However, short peer review times have been cited as one of the hallmarks of predatory journals (Cobey at al. 2018). Some have suggested that a faster and more agile peer review process may undermine the quality of published research (Bagdasarian et al. 2020).


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Dekanski ◽  
Ivana Drvenica ◽  
Olgica Nedic

A survey was conducted among editors of journals publishing in the field of chemistry, chemical technology and related topics in Serbia, aiming to collect information on their experience, problems and difficulties during peer-review process. Editors from 22 journals out of 27 which regularly published during 2015 replied. General data on journals were collected from responses obtained from editors-in-chief, whereas all editors (including sub-editors and section editors) participated in a questionnaire concerning peer-review procedure. Additionally, they were asked to evaluate quality of reports and attitude of reviewers, discuss present situation and suggest measures to improve peer-review process. Greatest problems encountered by editors in peer-review process can be summarized as follows: low rate of acceptance to review, low quality of reports, sometimes due to reviewer?s bias or his/her inability to properly understand review process. A method used to search for reviewers does not substantially influence quality of reports. Editors agree that introduction of On-Line process and creation of precise instructions for reviewers, education of potential reviewers, as well as social, public and professional recognition and appreciation of reviewers? work, are the most important measures to improve quality of peer-review process and, consecutively, quality of published articles and journals.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 324-324
Author(s):  
Lifeng Wang ◽  
Erqiang Wang ◽  
Dongpo He

The Publisher and Editor have retracted this article [1] in accordance with good ethical practices. After thorough investigations we believe that the peer review process was compromised. The article was published online on 31-12-2014.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document