scholarly journals Retracted Article: Historical development of IEQ in Danish dwellings - has energy efficiency requirements inhibited positive IEQ developments?

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 02055
Author(s):  
Lasse Rohde ◽  
Tine Steen Larsen ◽  
Rasmus Lund Jensen ◽  
Kim Trangbæk Jønsson ◽  
Evangelina Loukou

This article is an accidental publication. It was accepted by the Guest Editors in charge of the peer-review process without the authors' final consent. The Guest Editors have given their approval for this decision.

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 02077
Author(s):  
◽  
S.I Tanabe ◽  
H. Zhang ◽  
J. Kurnitski ◽  
M.C. Gameiro da Silva ◽  
...  

This article is an accidental publication. It was accepted by the Guest Editors in charge of the peer-review process without the authors' final consent. The Guest Editors have given their approval for this decision.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1109-1109
Author(s):  
Zhang Li-Guo

RETRACTION The Publisher and Editor have retracted this article [1] in accordance with good ethical practices. After a thorough investigations we believe that the peer review process was compromised. The article was published on-line on 31-12-2014.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenya Malcolm ◽  
Allison Groenendyk ◽  
Mary Cwik ◽  
Alisa Beyer

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Fullerton

For years, the gold-standard in academic publishing has been the peer-review process, and for the most part, peer-review remains a safeguard to authors publishing intentionally biased, misleading, and inaccurate information. Its purpose is to hold researchers accountable to the publishing standards of that field, including proper methodology, accurate literature reviews, etc. This presentation will establish the core tenants of peer-review, discuss if certain types of publications should be able to qualify as such, offer possible solutions, and discuss how this affects a librarian's reference interactions.


Author(s):  
Gianfranco Pacchioni

This chapter explores how validation of new results works in science. It also looks at the peer-review process, both pros and cons, as well as scientific communication, scientific journals, and scientific publishers. We give an assessment of the total number of existing journals with peer review. Other topics discussed include the phenomenon of open access, predatory journals and their impact on contemporary science, and the market of scientific publications. Finally, we touch on degenerative phenomena, such as the market of co-authors, bogus papers, and irrelevant and wrong studies, as well as the problem and the social cost of irreproducible results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document