Sex ratio evolution has been one of the most successful areas of evolutionary theory. Pioneered by Düsing and Fisher under panmixia, and later extended by Hamilton to cover local mate competition (LMC), these models often assume, either implicitly or explicitly, that all females are fertilized. Here, we examine the effects of relaxing this assumption, under both panmictic and LMC models with diploid genetics. We revisit the question of the mathematical relationship between sex ratio and probability of fertilization, and use these results to model sex ratio evolution under risk of incomplete fertilization. We find that (i) under panmixia, mate limitation has no effect on the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) sex allocation; (ii) under LMC, mate limitation can make sex allocation less female-biased than under complete fertilization; (iii) contrary to what is occasionally stated, a significant fraction of daughters can remain unfertilized at the ESS in LMC with mate limitation; (iv) with a commonly used mating function, the fraction of unfertilized daughters can be quite large, and (v) with more realistic fertilization functions, the deviation becomes smaller. The models are presented in three equivalent forms: individual selection, kin selection and group selection. This serves as an example of the equivalence of the methods, while each approach has their own advantages. We discuss possible extensions of the model to haplodiploidy.
Sex Ratio Theory is a Contradiction, Not an Extension, of Kin Selection
