scholarly journals Optimal Colonic Cancer Surgery- the Concept of Complete Mesocolic Excision

2016 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolae Bacalbaea
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15) ◽  
pp. 1763-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. West ◽  
Hirotoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Keiichi Takahashi ◽  
Aristoteles Perrakis ◽  
Klaus Weber ◽  
...  

Purpose Over recent years, patient outcomes after colon cancer resection have not improved to the same degree as for rectal cancer. Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) are both based on sound oncologic principles. Expert surgeons using both techniques report impressive outcomes as compared with standard surgery. We aimed to independently compare the physical appearances and quality of specimens resected using both techniques in major institutions in Japan and Germany. Methods A series of resections for primary colon cancer from one European and two Japanese centers were independently assessed in terms of the plane of surgery, physical characteristics, and lymph node yields. Results Mesocolic plane resection rates from both series were high; however, Japanese D3 specimens were significantly shorter (162 v 324 mm, P < .001), resulting in a smaller amount of mesentery (8,309 v 17,957 mm2, P < .001) and nodal yield (median, 18 v 32, P < .001). The distance from the high vascular tie to the bowel wall (100 v 99 mm, P = .605) was equivalent. Conclusion Both techniques showed high mesocolic plane resection rates and long distances between the high tie and the bowel wall. The extended longitudinal resection after CME with CVL increased the nodal yield but did not increase the number of tumor involved nodes. Both series were oncologically superior to recently reported series from other countries and confirm the wide variation in colonic cancer surgery and the need for further standardization and optimization following the approach undertaken in improving rectal cancer outcomes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Bertelsen ◽  
A. U. Neuenschwander ◽  
J. E. Jansen ◽  
A. Kirkegaard-Klitbo ◽  
J. R. Tenma ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abe Fingerhut ◽  
William Tzu-Liang Chen ◽  
Luigi Boni ◽  
Selman Uranues

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 98-98
Author(s):  
Chao Wang ◽  
Zhidong Gao ◽  
Zhanlong Shen ◽  
Kewei Jiang ◽  
Shan Wang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1357-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Gouvas ◽  
G. Pechlivanides ◽  
N. Zervakis ◽  
M. Kafousi ◽  
E. Xynos

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 344-348
Author(s):  
Hirotoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Nicholas P. West

AbstractOver the past 30 years, rectal cancer surgery has been standardized by total mesorectal excision. More recently, some have suggested that colon cancer surgery should be standardized by complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL), especially in Western countries. Surgeons undertaking CME with CVL report optimal outcomes. Sharp dissection within the embryological plane and high vascular ligation at the vessel origin are essential. In Japan, a similar concept, D3 dissection, has been adopted for decades. Although both surgical procedures are similar, distinct differences exist. Some surgeons are confused about the principles and practice of these two procedures. As well as overviewing the theory behind CME with CVL and D3 dissection, the technical details of both procedures are described.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Anders Bertelsen ◽  
Anders Ulrich Neuenschwander ◽  
Jens Erik Jansen ◽  
Michael Wilhelmsen ◽  
Anders Kirkegaard-Klitbo ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. West ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
Klaus Weber ◽  
Aristoteles Perrakis ◽  
Paul J. Finan ◽  
...  

Purpose The plane of surgery in colonic cancer has been linked to patient outcome although the optimal extent of mesenteric resection is still unclear. Surgeons in Erlangen, Germany, routinely perform complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) and report 5-year survivals of higher than 89%. We aimed to further investigate the importance of CME and CVL surgery for colonic cancer by comparison with a series of standard specimens. Methods The fresh photographs of 49 CME and CVL specimens from Erlangen and 40 standard specimens from Leeds, United Kingdom, for primary colonic adenocarcinoma were collected. Precise tissue morphometry and grading of the plane of surgery were performed before comparison to histopathologic variables. Results CME and CVL surgery removed more tissue compared with standard surgery in terms of the distance between the tumor and the high vascular tie (median, 131 v 90 mm; P < .0001), the length of large bowel (median, 314 v 206 mm; P < .0001), and ileum removed (median, 83 v 63 mm; P = .003), and the area of mesentery (19,657 v 11,829 mm2; P < .0001). In addition, CME and CVL surgery was associated with more mesocolic plane resections (92% v 40%; P < .0001) and a greater lymph node yield (median, 30 v 18; P < .0001). Conclusion Surgeons in Erlangen routinely practicing CME and CVL surgery remove more mesocolon and are more likely to resect in the mesocolic plane when compared with standard excisions. This, along with the associated greater lymph node yield, may partially explain the high 5-year survival rates reported in Erlangen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document