scholarly journals Prognostic Value of CD63 Expression in Solid Tumors: A Meta-analysis of the Literature

In Vivo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 2209-2215
Author(s):  
HYUN MIN KOH ◽  
BO GUN JANG ◽  
DONG CHUL KIM
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Liu ◽  
Sheng Chen ◽  
Kaige Ma ◽  
Zengwu Shao

Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 303-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Na Zhou ◽  
Yue Tan ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Ping Zeng ◽  
Min-Bin Chen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 484 ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaojie Liang ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Hua Ge ◽  
Yingchen Xu ◽  
Guangming Li ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 481 ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Ge ◽  
Chaojie Liang ◽  
Shulin Ren ◽  
Chaosen Yue ◽  
Jixiang Wu

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Borong Chen ◽  
Baisheng Chen ◽  
Zhipeng Zhu ◽  
Weipeng Ye ◽  
Junjie Zeng ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116
Author(s):  
Dan Zhang ◽  
Lizhen Dai ◽  
ZengXi Yang ◽  
XiChen Wang ◽  
Yin LanNing

Background: The prognostic value of Stathmin 1 (STMN1) in malignant solid tumors remains controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to summarize the potential value of STMN1 as a biomarker for predicting overall survival in patients with solid tumor. Methods: We systematically searched eligible studies in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from the establishment date of these databases to September 2018. Hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association between STMN1 expression and overall survival. Results: A total of 25 studies with 4625 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our combined results showed that high STMN1 expression was associated with poor overall survival in solid tumors (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.55, 2.21). In general, our subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated that our combined results were stable and reliable. However, from the results of the subgroups we found that high STMN1 expression was not related to overall survival in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer anymore, suggesting that much caution should be taken to interpret our combined result, and more studies with large sample sizes are required to further explore the prognostic value of STMN1 expression in the specific type of tumors, especially colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer. Conclusions: STMN1 could serve as a prognostic biomarker and could be developed as a valuable therapeutic target for patients with solid tumors. However, due to the limitations of the present meta-analysis, this conclusion should be taken with caution. Further studies adequately designed are required to confirm our findings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 1468-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingjie Shao ◽  
Wendong Gu ◽  
Zhonghua Ning ◽  
Xing Song ◽  
Honglei Pei ◽  
...  

Background: It has been reported that miR-203 expression was aberrant in various types of cancers, and it could be used as a prognostic biomarker. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of miR-203 expression in solid tumors by using meta-analysis and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. Methods: By doing a literature research in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library (last update by December 2016), we were able to identify the studies assessing the prognostic role of miR-203 in various tumors. We then used TCGA datasets to validate the results of meta-analysis. Results:33 studies from 26 articles were qualified and enrolled in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that higher expression of miR-203 in tissues couldn’t predict poor overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in solid tumors. However, the results of subgroup analyses revealed that the upregulation of tissue miR-203 expression was associated with poor OS in colorectal cancer (hazard ratio (HR)=1.81, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.31-2.49; P<0.001), pancreatic cancer (HR=1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.31; P<0.001) and ovarian cancer (HR=1.85, 95% CI 1.45-2.37; P<0.001); but it had opposite association in liver cancer (HR=0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.97; P=0.040) and esophageal cancer (HR=0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.66; P<0.001). Based on TCGA datasets, we found the same results for pancreatic cancer and esophageal cancer, but not for colorectal cancer and liver cancer. Moreover, patients with high circulating miR-203 in blood had significantly poor OS and PFS in colorectal cancer and breast cancer. Conclusion: Our study showed that the prognostic values of tissue miR-203 varied in different tumor types. In addition, the upregulation of circulating miR-203 in blood was associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document