Redesigning the Human-Machine Interface for Computer-Mediated Visual Technologies

1985 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Acker
Author(s):  
Gerald S. Greenberg

Computer mediated communication (CMC) is fundamentally different from other modes of informational exchange. The presence of those with whom one communicates is not completely known. Their identities are in question, easily created, and changed by CMC users themselves who are not constricted by geographical or political boundaries. CMC represents a new form of communication—a “cyborg discourse” consisting of dynamic interplay of words, symbols, and metaphors. Participants in CMC engage in a unique human/technology interface that operates in a disembodied environment. It appears as a world without a history, dominated by connections. This chapter seeks to briefly describe and assess CMC’s philosophical significance and its influence upon communication theory. Once regarded as either the advent of a blissful utopia or the death of human intercourse, CMC has come to be seen as a phenomenon with wide-ranging possibilities, one that has recast communications as a coding problem.


1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bly ◽  
P. J. Price ◽  
S. Park ◽  
S. Tepper ◽  
E. Jackson ◽  
...  

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 687
Author(s):  
Jinzhen Dou ◽  
Shanguang Chen ◽  
Zhi Tang ◽  
Chang Xu ◽  
Chengqi Xue

With the development and promotion of driverless technology, researchers are focusing on designing varied types of external interfaces to induce trust in road users towards this new technology. In this paper, we investigated the effectiveness of a multimodal external human–machine interface (eHMI) for driverless vehicles in virtual environment, focusing on a two-way road scenario. Three phases of identifying, decelerating, and parking were taken into account in the driverless vehicles to pedestrian interaction process. Twelve eHMIs are proposed, which consist of three visual features (smile, arrow and none), three audible features (human voice, warning sound and none) and two physical features (yielding and not yielding). We conducted a study to gain a more efficient and safer eHMI for driverless vehicles when they interact with pedestrians. Based on study outcomes, in the case of yielding, the interaction efficiency and pedestrian safety in multimodal eHMI design was satisfactory compared to the single-modal system. The visual modality in the eHMI of driverless vehicles has the greatest impact on pedestrian safety. In addition, the “arrow” was more intuitive to identify than the “smile” in terms of visual modality.


Author(s):  
Saverio Trotta ◽  
Dave Weber ◽  
Reinhard W. Jungmaier ◽  
Ashutosh Baheti ◽  
Jaime Lien ◽  
...  

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 488-493
Author(s):  
Florian Beuss ◽  
Frederik Schmatz ◽  
Marten Stepputat ◽  
Fabian Nokodian ◽  
Wilko Fluegge ◽  
...  

Nanoscale ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiufan Wang ◽  
Jiaheng Liu ◽  
Guofu Tian ◽  
Daohong Zhang

The rapid development of human-machine interface and artificial intelligence is dependent on flexible and wearable soft devices such as sensors and energy storage systems. One of the key factors for...


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Marianna Di Gregorio ◽  
Marco Romano ◽  
Monica Sebillo ◽  
Giuliana Vitiello ◽  
Angela Vozella

The use of Unmanned Aerial Systems, commonly called drones, is growing enormously today. Applications that can benefit from the use of fleets of drones and a related human–machine interface are emerging to ensure better performance and reliability. In particular, a fleet of drones can become a valuable tool for monitoring a wide area and transmitting relevant information to the ground control station. We present a human–machine interface for a Ground Control Station used to remotely operate a fleet of drones, in a collaborative setting, by a team of multiple operators. In such a collaborative setting, a major interface design challenge has been to maximize the Team Situation Awareness, shifting the focus from the individual operator to the entire group decision-makers. We were especially interested in testing the hypothesis that shared displays may improve the team situation awareness and hence the overall performance. The experimental study we present shows that there is no difference in performance between shared and non-shared displays. However, in trials when unexpected events occurred, teams using shared displays-maintained good performance whereas in teams using non-shared displays performance reduced. In particular, in case of unexpected situations, operators are able to safely bring more drones home, maintaining a higher level of team situational awareness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document