Public Property and the Democratization of Western Water Law: a Modern View of the Public Trust Doctrine

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Blumm
2021 ◽  
pp. 244-280
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Kearney ◽  
Thomas W. Merrill

This chapter focuses on a remarkable rebirth of the public trust doctrine and traces the arc of its development on the Chicago lakefront in the twentieth century. It discusses how the public trust doctrine became the primary legal rubric for resolving controversies about what is permitted and forbidden on the lakefront. The chapter then asserts that the purpose of the doctrine has changed dramatically. It was originally to preserve public access to navigable waters, in order to allow the public to engage in commerce or fishing, then the focus changed with the environmental revolution in the 1970s. Today, the purpose is understood to be the preservation of public resources in the hands of public institutions. Ultimately, the chapter analyses how the doctrine became an antiprivatization doctrine for certain select categories of public property.


2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Blumm ◽  
Thea Schwartz

The Mono Lake case is a lodestar in public trust jurisprudence. This article discusses that case and explains how it revolutionized California water law. The article identifies six principles established by the decision that place it in the vanguard of public trust case law. It also examines some of the progeny of the Mono Lake decision, both in California and in other western states. The article claims that in the wake of Mono Lake, a half dozen western states have recognized the application of the public trust doctrine to water rights, although no other state has embraced all six of the tenets of the Mono Lake doctrine. The article concludes that the the public trust doctrine's deep historical roots and conceptual coherence make it a promising vehicle by which to moderate the excesses of the prior appropriation doctrine of western water law and replace that doctrine's "all or nothing" approach with what the article refers to as the "accommodation principle," under which both diversionary and instream uses of water will be accommodated wherever feasible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document