scholarly journals Effect of Principal Stress Direction on Undrained Cyclic Shear Behavior of Dense Sand.

1996 ◽  
pp. 199-213
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Sato ◽  
Kazuya Yasuhara ◽  
Tohru Higuchi ◽  
Nobuo Yoshida
Géotechnique ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. F. Arthur ◽  
K. S. Chua ◽  
T. Dunstan

Author(s):  
Inge Lotsberg

For fatigue design it is necessary to provide guidelines on how to calculate fatigue damage at weld toes based on S-N data when the principal stress direction is different from that of the normal direction to the weld toe. Such stress conditions are found at details in different types of plated structures. Some different fatigue criteria for these stress conditions are presented in design standards on fatigue design. Criteria used by the International Institute of Welding (IIW), Eurocode, British Standard and in the DNV standards have been assessed against some relevant fatigue test data presented in the literature. Only proportional loading conditions have been considered here. (By proportional loading is understood that the principal stress direction is kept constant during a load cycle). An alternative equation for calculation of an equivalent or effective stress range based on stress normal to the weld toe and shear stress at the weld toe has been proposed. The proposed methodology can be used for nominal S-N curves and it can be used together with a hot spot stress S-N curve with stresses read out from finite element analysis. The different design criteria are presented in this paper together with recommendations on analysis procedure.


1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Dunstan ◽  
M. Jamebozorgi ◽  
S. Akbarian-Miandouab

Author(s):  
Seiji Asada

A Code Case for procedure to determine strain rate and Fen for environmental fatigue evaluation is under preparation in the ASME BPV Committee on Construction of Nuclear Facility Components (III). The draft Code Case is to incorporate two methods for strain rate calculation. One is based on NB-3216.1 “Constant Principal Stress Direction” that comes from the JSME Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method. The other is based on NB-3216.2 “Varying Principal Stress Direction” that was proposed by M. Gray et al. In this paper, both methods are explained and compared by using a sample problem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document